Re: [PATCH] out-of-date: PORTSDIR_PATH support

2012-12-18 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:18:29PM +, Nigel Taylor wrote: > out-of-date is not really used any more, don't know why your using it. I still use it, too. And i use dpb -- very often with -P, after fiddling with the output of out-of-date, to get some monsters like libreoffice out of the way

Re: [PATCH] out-of-date: PORTSDIR_PATH support

2012-12-18 Thread Sébastien Marie
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:18:29PM +, Nigel Taylor wrote: > > out-of-date is not really used any more, don't know why your using it. > mainly because it is a valuable tool to check is the installed packages are in sync with /usr/ports. but maybe I don't manage my updates in a accurate manne

Re: [PATCH] out-of-date: PORTSDIR_PATH support

2012-12-18 Thread Nigel Taylor
On 12/17/12 19:02, Sébastien Marie wrote: > Hi, > > As my previous message seems to get very small audience, I rewrite > it... please excuse my previous mail, which was bad written. > > The purpose is to permit the use of out-of-date(1) with customized > mk.conf(5), in particular the usage of POR

Re: [PATCH] out-of-date: PORTSDIR_PATH support

2012-12-18 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:02:24PM +0100, Sébastien Marie wrote: > Hi, > > As my previous message seems to get very small audience, I rewrite it... > please excuse my previous mail, which was bad written. > > The purpose is to permit the use of out-of-date(1) with customized > mk.conf(5), in pa

[PATCH] out-of-date: PORTSDIR_PATH support

2012-12-17 Thread Sébastien Marie
Hi, As my previous message seems to get very small audience, I rewrite it... please excuse my previous mail, which was bad written. The purpose is to permit the use of out-of-date(1) with customized mk.conf(5), in particular the usage of PORTSDIR_PATH (search path for package specifications).