Hi,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:18:29PM +, Nigel Taylor wrote:
> out-of-date is not really used any more, don't know why your using it.
I still use it, too. And i use dpb -- very often with -P, after
fiddling with the output of out-of-date, to get some monsters like
libreoffice out of the way
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:18:29PM +, Nigel Taylor wrote:
>
> out-of-date is not really used any more, don't know why your using it.
>
mainly because it is a valuable tool to check is the installed packages are in
sync with /usr/ports.
but maybe I don't manage my updates in a accurate manne
On 12/17/12 19:02, Sébastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As my previous message seems to get very small audience, I rewrite
> it... please excuse my previous mail, which was bad written.
>
> The purpose is to permit the use of out-of-date(1) with customized
> mk.conf(5), in particular the usage of POR
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:02:24PM +0100, Sébastien Marie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As my previous message seems to get very small audience, I rewrite it...
> please excuse my previous mail, which was bad written.
>
> The purpose is to permit the use of out-of-date(1) with customized
> mk.conf(5), in pa
Hi,
As my previous message seems to get very small audience, I rewrite it... please
excuse my previous mail, which was bad written.
The purpose is to permit the use of out-of-date(1) with customized mk.conf(5),
in particular the usage of PORTSDIR_PATH (search path for package
specifications).