Stuart Henderson writes:
> Thanks - committed with small tweaks.
>
Thanks Stuart!
> On 2020/02/02 18:58, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>> Thanks Stuart for the reply.
>>
>> Stuart Henderson writes:
>>
>> > On 2020/02/02 04:05, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>> >> Seems no one cares about this port. Is it OK that I
Thanks - committed with small tweaks.
On 2020/02/02 18:58, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Thanks Stuart for the reply.
>
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > On 2020/02/02 04:05, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> >> Seems no one cares about this port. Is it OK that I apply for maintainer?
> >
> > Certainly. It is a bit ea
Thanks Stuart for the reply.
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2020/02/02 04:05, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>> Seems no one cares about this port. Is it OK that I apply for maintainer?
>
> Certainly. It is a bit easier to take patches from someone that feels
> responsible enough for a port to be listed as m
On 2020/02/02 04:05, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Seems no one cares about this port. Is it OK that I apply for maintainer?
Certainly. It is a bit easier to take patches from someone that feels
responsible enough for a port to be listed as maintainer :)
> >>> * Many of the patches just replace "#!/u
Seems no one cares about this port. Is it OK that I apply for maintainer?
Xiyue Deng writes:
> Friendly ping.
>
> Xiyue Deng writes:
>
>> Stuart Henderson writes:
>>
>>> I'd prefer not to be CC'd on ports that I don't have anything to do with,
>>> ports@ is enough.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry about this
Friendly ping.
Xiyue Deng writes:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
>> I'd prefer not to be CC'd on ports that I don't have anything to do with,
>> ports@ is enough.
>>
>
> Sorry about this Stuart. It's just that it has been weeks since I sent
> out the diff and there is not dedicated maintainer fo
Stuart Henderson writes:
> I'd prefer not to be CC'd on ports that I don't have anything to do with,
> ports@ is enough.
>
Sorry about this Stuart. It's just that it has been weeks since I sent
out the diff and there is not dedicated maintainer for this port, and
you have been kindly offering y
I'd prefer not to be CC'd on ports that I don't have anything to do with,
ports@ is enough.
On 2020/01/12 03:13, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Friendly ping.
>
> Xiyue Deng writes:
>
> > Friendly ping. CCing Stuart in case he's interested.
> >
> > Xiyue Deng writes:
> >
> >> Friendly ping.
> >>
> >> X
Friendly ping.
Xiyue Deng writes:
> Friendly ping. CCing Stuart in case he's interested.
>
> Xiyue Deng writes:
>
>> Friendly ping.
>>
>> Xiyue Deng writes:
>>
>>> Dear ports maintainers,
>>>
>>> I have updated msmtp to the latest version (1.8.6) in ports. It
>>> includes the following chang
Friendly ping. CCing Stuart in case he's interested.
Xiyue Deng writes:
> Friendly ping.
>
> Xiyue Deng writes:
>
>> Dear ports maintainers,
>>
>> I have updated msmtp to the latest version (1.8.6) in ports. It
>> includes the following changes:
>>
>> * GnuTLS is recommended and deprecated Op
Friendly ping.
Xiyue Deng writes:
> Dear ports maintainers,
>
> I have updated msmtp to the latest version (1.8.6) in ports. It
> includes the following changes:
>
> * GnuTLS is recommended and deprecated OpenSSL.
> - So now GnuTLS is part of the build dependencies.
>
> * Use libidn2 instead
Dear ports maintainers,
I have updated msmtp to the latest version (1.8.6) in ports. It
includes the following changes:
* GnuTLS is recommended and deprecated OpenSSL.
- So now GnuTLS is part of the build dependencies.
* Use libidn2 instead of the older libidn.
- Configure switch remains as
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:40:33PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> This release supports SHA256 fingerprints for tls_fingerprint, and
> mark both SHA1 and MD5 as deprecated.
Works for me.
Upgraded my old SHA1 fingerprint to SHA256 with no issues. Also changed
one character and checked the check f
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> update msmtp to 1.6.5.
>
> This release supports SHA256 fingerprints for tls_fingerprint, and
> mark both SHA1 and MD5 as deprecated.
>
> OK?
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS fil
update msmtp to 1.6.5.
This release supports SHA256 fingerprints for tls_fingerprint, and
mark both SHA1 and MD5 as deprecated.
OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/msmtp/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -p -
Hi,
This diff updates msmtp to the latest release.
Changelog :
This release fixes a bug in SOCKS proxy support and the handling of
non-fatal errors in TLS handshakes.
Note that starting from this version, we do not provide binaries for
Windows platforms anymore.
Comments ? OK ?
Cheers,
benoit
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> update mail/msmtp to 1.6.2
>
> changes:
> http://msmtp.sourceforge.net/news.html
>
> diff at:
> http://shutupandhack.org/~gsoares/openbsd/msmtp-1.6.2.diff
>
> OK?
Works for me.
ok dcoppa@
Ciao!
David
update mail/msmtp to 1.6.2
changes:
http://msmtp.sourceforge.net/news.html
diff at:
http://shutupandhack.org/~gsoares/openbsd/msmtp-1.6.2.diff
OK?
cheers,
gsoares
Fix my problem with gmail too, thanks !!
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:41:35PM -0200, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> hi,
>
> here is a diff that update mail/msmtp to 1.4.27
>
> important fix:
> http://msmtp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=msmt
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> hi,
>
> here is a diff that update mail/msmtp to 1.4.27
>
> important fix:
> http://msmtp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=msmtp/msmtp;a=commit;h=8aaf441afcd543de4598a916285706819e6c451a
> (thanks to jeremy@ and Ma
hi,
here is a diff that update mail/msmtp to 1.4.27
important fix:
http://msmtp.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=msmtp/msmtp;a=commit;h=8aaf441afcd543de4598a916285706819e6c451a
(thanks to jeremy@ and Markus Lude that let me know the issue, and tested the
upstream patch).
also i did some
Please test and okay.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/msmtp/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 Makefile
--- Makefile19 Nov 2010 07:23:07 - 1.24
+++ Makefile22 Mar 2011 13:34:24 -
@
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:12:30 +0100, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Please test. This works for me on i386.
Works for me on amd64.
Regards,
Tim
Please test. This works for me on i386.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/msmtp/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 Makefile
--- Makefile27 Oct 2008 11:34:00 - 1.16
+++ Makefile5 Feb 2009 1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:12:36PM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Here's an update for msmtp, please test! (patch -E)
>
> From: Tim van der Molen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Thank you!
Forgot to mention that this was tested on i386 and amd64.
--
Everything is simple, we're stupid.
gopher://sdf.lonestar.or
Here's an update for msmtp, please test! (patch -E)
From: Tim van der Molen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Thank you!
--
Everything is simple, we're stupid.
gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/bulibuta
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/ma
Hi,
here is the patch to update msmtp to version 1.4.13:
http://blarzwurst.de/openbsd/msmtp.diff
License changed to GPLv3 and one small error was fixed:
"Make the search of an account by the envelope from address case
insensitive."
There are now two scripts included: msmtpqueue and set_sendmail
Hi,
here's the patch to update msmtp to version 1.4.9 (just found out that I
was trying to update a version lacking behind :).
Usual distname bump, checksum and patch update. The problem I posted to
this list was solved with 1.4.8.
I disabled libidn by default, because I think it's not really ne
28 matches
Mail list logo
