On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:24:46PM +, Brandon Mercer wrote:
[...]
What is the plan for llvm? We should be able to use the llvm in
ports in the long term,
I will try to explain the current status of rust with LLVM.
I am agreed that I would be very good thing that rust could be able to
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x17cf21e32181 in je_tsd_cleanup () from
/usr/obj/ports/rust-1.0.0/rust-stage0/bin/rustc
#1 0x17d21b150056 in _rthread_tls_destructors (thread=0x17d17efaaa00)
at
On 2015/05/19 17:24, Sébastien Marie wrote:
I have rebuild the bootstrapper.
Could you try again with this patch ?
Yes - works here, thanks.
bmercer, you can go ahead and commit if you like, OK me.
On 2015/05/16 09:15, Sébastien Marie wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Here a patch in order to update rust to 1.0.0 (stable version).
Tested using make test.
ok, same but with updated plist. sorry for the noise.
Build fails for me:
On 2015/05/17 12:26, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2015/05/16 09:15, Sébastien Marie wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 09:08:45AM +0200, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Here a patch in order to update rust to 1.0.0 (stable version).
Tested using make test.
ok, same but with
Hi,
Here a patch in order to update rust to 1.0.0 (stable version).
Tested using make test.
Thanks.
--
Sébastien Marie
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/rust/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.3
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:24:46PM +, Brandon Mercer wrote:
I have a very similar diff that I did yesterday and it worked well. The
beta that is in ports now is not really usable as is so I'm OK with it
going in.
What are the problem you have with beta ? A rust problem that the
update
