On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:32:06AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:51:13AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:46:55AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:51:13AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:46:55AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:42:02AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:51:13AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:46:55AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:42:02AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:24:14AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:46:55AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:42:02AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:24:14AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:05:48PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:42:02AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:24:14AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:05:48PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:24:14AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:05:48PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2017/06/12 11:00,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:05:48PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2017/06/12 11:00, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > > Is it expected to have an unversionned lib
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2017/06/12 11:00, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > Is it expected to have an unversionned lib?
> > > lib/libpdalcpp.so
> >
> > Ah I missed that one. So probably a
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/06/12 11:00, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > Is it expected to have an unversionned lib?
> > lib/libpdalcpp.so
>
> Ah I missed that one. So probably add pdalcpp and drop pdal_plugin_*
> from SHARED_LIBS?
>From what i underst
On 2017/06/12 11:00, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Is it expected to have an unversionned lib?
> lib/libpdalcpp.so
Ah I missed that one. So probably add pdalcpp and drop pdal_plugin_*
from SHARED_LIBS?
> Also you shouldn't hardcode python3.6m, use ${MODPY_WANTLIB} instead.
+1
On 2017/06/12 10:47, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's a quick port for https://www.pdal.io, a point data translation
> library (think like GDAL, but for point cloud data/3d stuff). The next
> step would be porting https://github.com/pgpointcloud/pointcloud to
> store data into postgresql inst
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:47:12AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's a quick port for https://www.pdal.io, a point data translation
> library (think like GDAL, but for point cloud data/3d stuff). The next
> step would be porting https://github.com/pgpointcloud/pointcloud to
> store data
Hi,
here's a quick port for https://www.pdal.io, a point data translation
library (think like GDAL, but for point cloud data/3d stuff). The next
step would be porting https://github.com/pgpointcloud/pointcloud to
store data into postgresql instead of LAS files..
oks welcome, i'll try to pushback
13 matches
Mail list logo