bird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080812)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: ports@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Firefox 3.0.5 question..
> References: <200812182103.mbil3ovb017...@landisk.altroot.org>
> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Tr
Martynas Venckus wrote:
So... What is your question?
Should it use nspr/nss? Yes, because it's easier for me to maintain.
The newer version of nspr 4.7.3 also fixes bugs that i wanted to be
fixed. There are no interface changes for 4.7.1 <=> 4.7.3.
Is there any real issue with that? Could
rrXL+CuYQoC3prurq1xTebh+Z9/CQcjpQtKygNPuKv+m2
> qfOAW7GgX5uQKXlbFxH3i5W5Njn9dvGoFW4QyWmUllj47Z1nVQodnad15jS+HBSi+MKu
> +td1eflmLWAGgosDHbaFj7+IqgWKn+GDSFfxw=
> From: Brynet
> To: ports@openbsd.org
> Subject: Firefox 3.0.5 question..
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: tex
Mozilla just recently released version 3.0.5, it fixes 4 things they deem
critical.
I was just about to update my port as usual when I noticed that they bundle:
* nspr 4.7.1 (an older release, we use 4.7.3)
* nss 3.12.2 (an unreleased, "release" candidate)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cg
