On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:24:20AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > I considered something like this too, but it didn't overall feel quite
> > > right - we need a way to set the script name anyway (even without
> > > autoreconf -fi the names vary), and I'm trying to avoid too much use
> > > of
> > I considered something like this too, but it didn't overall feel quite
> > right - we need a way to set the script name anyway (even without
> > autoreconf -fi the names vary), and I'm trying to avoid too much use
> > of the word "autogen" to avoid confusion with devel/autogen.
>
> Now that yo
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:49:19AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/11/11 11:43, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:51:55AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > After getting annoyed at typing this manually for the Nth time, I thought
> > > it would be a good idea to add
On 2015/11/11 11:43, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:51:55AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > After getting annoyed at typing this manually for the Nth time, I thought
> > it would be a good idea to add support for running "autogen.sh" type scripts
> > to gnu.port.mk. The dif
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:51:55AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> After getting annoyed at typing this manually for the Nth time, I thought
> it would be a good idea to add support for running "autogen.sh" type scripts
> to gnu.port.mk. The diff includes a conversion for audio/tremor as an
> exam
After getting annoyed at typing this manually for the Nth time, I thought
it would be a good idea to add support for running "autogen.sh" type scripts
to gnu.port.mk. The diff includes a conversion for audio/tremor as an
example, I'll write up a bit for bsd.port.mk(5) if it's ok to add.
Index: inf
