Josh Grosse [2007-01-13, 20:03:24]:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:32:14AM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote:
some testing on more archs would be good...
AFAIK, this port has been tested on i386, amd64, and zaurus. Has anyone
tested it on any other archs?
The tests are giving an error on
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:32:14AM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote:
some testing on more archs would be good...
AFAIK, this port has been tested on i386, amd64, and zaurus. Has anyone
tested it on any other archs?
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:10:56PM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
I will try to deliver *both* a SUBPACKAGE and FLAVOR
infrastructure, and a choice of diffs for ports/archivers/Makefile by
tomorrow.
Both types are attached; I have tested the SUBPACKAGE version here and it
correctly places
Josh Grosse [2007-01-11, 15:39:49]:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:10:56PM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
I will try to deliver *both* a SUBPACKAGE and FLAVOR
infrastructure, and a choice of diffs for ports/archivers/Makefile by
tomorrow.
Both types are attached; I have tested the SUBPACKAGE
Attached is an updated tarball for archivers/p7zip.
Corrections/Additions:
1. -fPIC added to correct errors in amd64 build.
2. WANTLIB tested and added to Makefile.
3. PLIST and PFRAG.shared rebuilt under archivers/p7zip
4. Typos corrected in DESCR.
Tested on i386 and
On 2007/01/10 05:50, Josh Grosse wrote:
Attached is an updated tarball for archivers/p7zip.
work for me on armish.
Josh Grosse [2007-01-10, 05:50:42]:
Attached is an updated tarball for archivers/p7zip.
Corrections/Additions:
1. -fPIC added to correct errors in amd64 build.
2. WANTLIB tested and added to Makefile.
3. PLIST and PFRAG.shared rebuilt under archivers/p7zip
4. Typos
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:43:56PM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote:
I cleaned up your port a bit.
Thank you, I appreciate the help, you've made the Makefile much more readable,
and much easier for someone (like me) to maintain!
I think it's SHARED_ONLY because of 7z.
I'm not sure. Nothing in
7-zip is a file archiver with the highest compression ratio.
Homepage : www.7-zip.org
7z uses plugins to handle archives.
7za is a stand-alone executable.
7za handles less archive formats than 7z.exe. i
7zr is a light stand-alone executable that supports only
Josh Grosse [2007-01-09, 10:42:29]:
7-zip is a file archiver with the highest compression ratio.
Homepage : www.7-zip.org
7zuses plugins to handle archives.
7za is a stand-alone executable.
7za handles less archive formats than 7z.exe. i
7zr is a light stand-alone
On 2007/01/09 17:01, steven mestdagh wrote:
does this provide any advantages over lzma-utils (archivers/lzma port)?
lzma doesn't support 7z files.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 05:01:51PM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote:
does this provide any advantages over lzma-utils (archivers/lzma port)?
AFAIK, lzma-utils uses LZMA compression only. The p7zip sourceforge
project's toolkit includes many other compression and archive formats,
including (per
On 2007/01/09 10:42, Josh Grosse wrote:
7-zip is a file archiver with the highest compression ratio.
Tested only on i386, in process of testing on amd64 (qemu takes a long time).
g++ on armish isn't exactly a speed demon, either (2hrs). The program
seems to run OK there, but I noticed some
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:29:34PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/01/09 10:42, Josh Grosse wrote:
7-zip is a file archiver with the highest compression ratio.
Tested only on i386, in process of testing on amd64 (qemu takes a long
time).
g++ on armish isn't exactly a speed
14 matches
Mail list logo
