> From: Marc Espie
> Date: 2019-04-06 13:24:35
> Message-ID: 20190406132435.GA7545 () lain ! home
> [Download RAW message or body]
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:11:57AM -0500, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> > You are correct its not my process, but I am still curious as to the
> >
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 07:11:57AM -0500, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> You are correct its not my process, but I am still curious as to the
> rationale which is just a question that was not answered. Nowhere did I
> suggest, or imply, that it should be changed.
There's no rationale.
Just
On 4/5/19 7:44 AM, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
Is this due to an inefficient process, technical limitation, or other
reason (lack of manpower doesn't qualify as that seems self inflicted
by the project)?
This wording is one of several things that led to accusations of
disrespect. If I said
On 2019/04/05 06:44, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Could you please explain the logic behind this as I am confused. Is this due
> to an inefficient process, technical limitation, or other reason (lack of
> manpower doesn't qualify as that seems self inflicted by the project)?
You seem to disagree
u. Fedora has three stages of "milestone freezing".
This is not an uncommon thing.
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeze_(software_engineering)
Cheers,
>
> > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:58:06 +0200
> > From: Christian Weisgerber
> > To: ports@openbsd.org
>
Apr 05, 2019 at 07:20:49AM -0500, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Do you have documentation on this process? I would be happy to read it and
> ask questions you feel may be better. As an open source project I am
> surprised about the lack of transparency for various things.
You will find several
gain, they may
> exist I just don't know of any and find the process awkward and confusing.
>
> > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 15:58:06 +0200
> > From: Christian Weisgerber
> > To: ports@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Ports tree locked for 6.5 release
> > Message-ID: <
>Do you have documentation on this process? I would be happy to read it
>and ask questions you feel may be better. As an open source project I am
>surprised about the lack of transparency for various things.
Such strong words!
>I have opinions yes, but I also try to understand those of others
Do you have documentation on this process? I would be happy to read it
and ask questions you feel may be better. As an open source project I am
surprised about the lack of transparency for various things.
I have opinions yes, but I also try to understand those of others which
is what prompted
>You are correct its not my process, but I am still curious as to the
>rationale which is just a question that was not answered. Nowhere did I
>suggest, or imply, that it should be changed.
>
>And how do you define crappier releases? If something is stable enough
>that the development team
You are correct its not my process, but I am still curious as to the
rationale which is just a question that was not answered. Nowhere did I
suggest, or imply, that it should be changed.
And how do you define crappier releases? If something is stable enough
that the development team decide to
>Could you please explain the logic behind this as I am confused. Is this
>due to an inefficient process, technical limitation, or other reason
>(lack of manpower doesn't qualify as that seems self inflicted by the
>project)? Are you somehow tracking submissions to take care of when this
, 4 Apr 2019 15:58:06 +0200
From: Christian Weisgerber
To: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Ports tree locked for 6.5 release
Message-ID: <20190404135806.gb29...@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
The t2k19 hackathon has concluded and the ports tree is now locked
for the 6.5 release. Important(!) fixes are
The t2k19 hackathon has concluded and the ports tree is now locked
for the 6.5 release. Important(!) fixes are still possible for a
brief period. Committers need to ask sthen@ or me for approval.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
14 matches
Mail list logo
