Re: [Update] databases/py-redis to 4.3.4

2022-10-04 Thread Uwe Werler
On 12 Sep 21:26, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/09/12 20:12, Uwe Werler wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > here's an update for py-redis to 4.3.4 (with cluster support since 4.1.0). > > It needs some new deps, see the install_requires block in setup.py - tgz > attached for those. > > Here's a tweaked

Re: [Update] databases/py-redis to 4.3.4

2022-09-12 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/09/12 20:12, Uwe Werler wrote: > Hi all, > > here's an update for py-redis to 4.3.4 (with cluster support since 4.1.0). It needs some new deps, see the install_requires block in setup.py - tgz attached for those. Here's a tweaked version of the port update diff. The redismod/cluster tes

Re: UPDATE: databases/py-redis-3.0.1

2018-12-12 Thread Edward Lopez-Acosta
ping? Edward Lopez-Acosta On 12/6/18 5:39 PM, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote: Resubmitting the diff so its easier for commit. I replaced the py-py test depend with py-mock like it should be. py-py is pulled is as a dependency of mock. Edward Lopez-Acosta On 12/6/18 4:26 AM, Stuart Henderson wro

Re: UPDATE: databases/py-redis-3.0.1

2018-12-06 Thread Edward Lopez-Acosta
Resubmitting the diff so its easier for commit. I replaced the py-py test depend with py-mock like it should be. py-py is pulled is as a dependency of mock. Edward Lopez-Acosta On 12/6/18 4:26 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018/12/05 18:47, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote: Backwards incompatible

Re: UPDATE: databases/py-redis-3.0.1

2018-12-06 Thread Edward Lopez-Acosta
Hi Stuart, It does look like the py-py requirement changed to mock as you noted. I didn't notice the warning initially, my mistake. Would you like me to submit a new diff this evening with that change? I see the same number of tests pass and be skipped. Thanks for the sqlite tip as well. I am

Re: UPDATE: databases/py-redis-3.0.1

2018-12-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/12/05 18:47, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote: > Backwards incompatible changes in this, but checking sqlports I found > nothing that depends on this. I installed this package and ran a series of > tests on it using some of my old scripts and didn't hit issues. > > $ sqlite3 /usr/local/share/sqlp

Re: [UPDATE] databases/py-redis

2015-11-15 Thread David Coppa
Il 15/nov/2015 16:28, "Remi Pointel" ha scritto: > > Hi, > > attached is the diff to update py-redis to latest release. > > Ok? Ok dcoppa@ > Cheers, > > Remi. Ciao! David

Re: [UPDATE] databases/py-redis

2013-09-26 Thread David Coppa
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Remi Pointel wrote: > Yes, I had a problem with the bad egg this is why I removed this, and it > worked for me. > I will retest. If you remove "MODPY_BADEGGS = redis", 'make clean' will also fail.

Re: [UPDATE] databases/py-redis

2013-09-26 Thread Remi Pointel
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:33:42 +0200 David Coppa wrote: > On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Remi Pointel wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > this is the diff to update to latest release of py-redis: 2.8.0. > > You need to have py-test version 2.3.5 to run the test suite. > > > > Ok? > > This has a problem with bad egg

Re: [UPDATE] databases/py-redis

2013-09-26 Thread David Coppa
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Remi Pointel wrote: > Hi, > > this is the diff to update to latest release of py-redis: 2.8.0. > You need to have py-test version 2.3.5 to run the test suite. > > Ok? This has a problem with bad eggs I cannot find an easy solution for... /usr/ports/databases/py-redis>$ mak

Re: [UPDATE] databases/py-redis

2011-07-26 Thread David Coppa
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Remi Pointel wrote: > Hi, > > this is the diff to update py-redis to 2.4.9. > > Is it ok ? Sure. Go ahead. ciao, david

Re: [UPDATE] databases/py-redis

2011-07-17 Thread David Coppa
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Remi Pointel wrote: > Hi, > > this is the diff to update py-redis to 2.4.6. > > Are you ok ? Go for it. cheers, david

Re: [Update] databases/py-redis

2011-06-02 Thread David Coppa
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:25 PM, wen heping wrote: > Hi, > >   Here is an update of databases/py-redis to 2.4.1. > >   Tested OK on Loongson and it has no regress tests. > >   Comments ? OK ? yep. ok for me. ciao, david