Re: [update] devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify 0.28 -> 0.31

2019-05-05 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 10:58:04AM +0200, Charlene Wendling wrote: > Hi ports, > > Here is an update for File::ChangeNotify. > > What's new upstream [0]: > > - Don't use Class::Load anymore > - New feature: track path attribute changes (permissions, > ownership), providing old vs new attribut

[update] devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify 0.28 -> 0.31

2019-05-04 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi ports, Here is an update for File::ChangeNotify. What's new upstream [0]: - Don't use Class::Load anymore - New feature: track path attribute changes (permissions, ownership), providing old vs new attributes and contents in modify events. As it's resource-intensive, it's not enabled by

UPDATE: devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify 0.20

2011-12-13 Thread Andreas Vögele
Hi, the attached patch updates devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify to version 0.20. The update fixes a bug in the kqueue-based file watcher. Upstream changed the license from "same as perl" to Artistic 2.0. Tested on i386 and amd64. Comments? Ok? Index: Makefile =

Re: UPDATE: devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify

2011-01-01 Thread Andreas Vögele
Mikolaj Kucharski writes: > So, File::ChangeNotify doesn't handle resource limits gracefuly, > yeah[ref#2]? If that is true, your changes make sense for me. Yes, exactly. The KQueue-based watcher class doesn't fall back to polling if it runs out of file descriptors. I've attached an updated diff

Re: UPDATE: devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify

2011-01-01 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 03:34:27PM +0100, Andreas Vögele wrote: > Mikolaj Kucharski writes: > > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Andreas Vögele wrote: > >> It seems that the port so far didn't take into account that the > >> p5-IO-KQueue package could be installed on the system. Since the

Re: UPDATE: devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify

2011-01-01 Thread Andreas Vögele
Andreas Vögele writes: > Mikolaj Kucharski writes: >> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Andreas Vögele wrote: >>> It seems that the port so far didn't take into account that the >>> p5-IO-KQueue package could be installed on the system. Since the >>> KQueue-based file watcher quickly exce

Re: UPDATE: devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify

2011-01-01 Thread Andreas Vögele
Mikolaj Kucharski writes: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Andreas Vögele wrote: >> It seems that the port so far didn't take into account that the >> p5-IO-KQueue package could be installed on the system. Since the >> KQueue-based file watcher quickly exceeds the maximum number of >>

Re: UPDATE: devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify

2011-01-01 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Andreas Vögele wrote: > It seems that the port so far didn't take into account that the > p5-IO-KQueue package could be installed on the system. Since the > KQueue-based file watcher quickly exceeds the maximum number of open > files in a default OpenBSD in

UPDATE: devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify

2011-01-01 Thread Andreas Vögele
Hi, attached is a patch that updates devel/p5-File-ChangeNotify from version 0.13 to 0.19. The updated version works with OpenBSD's Moose 1.08 but also with more recent Moose versions. The patch also fixes a small bug in KQueue.pm, that I reported to upstream. It seems that the port so far didn'