Re: update: mail/offlineimap to latest HEAD

2024-05-12 Thread Jon Fineman
Sebastien Marie writes: > Hi, > > With the switch to python-3.11 by default, mail/offlineimap stopped > working due to some (wrong) assertion: > > AssertionError: Your sqlite is not multithreading safe. > > The `sqlite3.threadsafety` changed in python-3.11, the value is set > dynamically

update: mail/offlineimap to latest HEAD

2024-05-11 Thread Sebastien Marie
Hi, With the switch to python-3.11 by default, mail/offlineimap stopped working due to some (wrong) assertion: AssertionError: Your sqlite is not multithreading safe. The `sqlite3.threadsafety` changed in python-3.11, the value is set dynamically instead of hard-coding it to 1, and

Re: [UPDATE] mail/offlineimap to 6.7.0

2016-03-19 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Committed, thanks. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

[UPDATE] mail/offlineimap to 6.7.0

2016-03-12 Thread Remi Locherer
Hi The offlineimap project released version 6.7.0 few days ago. Works fine for me on amd64 -current syncing between dovecot (on 5.8) and maildir. Remi Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/offlineimap/Makefile,v retrieving

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2015-11-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/11/29 21:21, Remi Locherer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:45:25AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > > * Trailing spaces on your post-build lines. > Removed in the new diff. How do you spot these? Depends on your editor - http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Highlight_unwanted_spaces is one option.

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2015-11-30 Thread Edd Barrett
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:14:40AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/11/29 21:21, Remi Locherer wrote: > > Removed in the new diff. How do you spot these? > > Depends on your editor - http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Highlight_unwanted_spaces > is one option. Indeed. I just have vim highlight

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2015-11-29 Thread Remi Locherer
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:45:25AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:05:15AM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote: > > This is an update for mail/offlineimp to version 6.5.7. > > Looks good. A couple of comments: > > * Trailing spaces on your post-build lines. Removed in the new

UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2015-11-29 Thread Remi Locherer
Hi This is an update for mail/offlineimp to version 6.5.7. With version 6.5.6 I run into a bug where after offlineimap would not continue when it's db was corrupt and the folter existed on both sites. With this version that bug is fixed. I tested this on amd64 -current and 5.8. I'm using imap

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2015-11-29 Thread Edd Barrett
Hello, On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:05:15AM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote: > This is an update for mail/offlineimp to version 6.5.7. Looks good. A couple of comments: * Trailing spaces on your post-build lines. * I don't actually use offlineimap, so it makes little sense for me to be

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/11/23 20:31, Edd Barrett wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:06:59AM +0100, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: Looks good to me. ok pea but please remove me as maintainer. Sorry about the delay. So here is the diff with Stuart's suggestion and dropping pea@ as MAINTAINER. I use this to

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-24 Thread Edd Barrett
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:06:59AM +0100, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote: Looks good to me. ok pea but please remove me as maintainer. Sorry about the delay. So here is the diff with Stuart's suggestion and dropping pea@ as MAINTAINER. I use this to pick up my mail, so I don't mind taking

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-23 Thread Edd Barrett
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:34:56PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: This DISTNAME is a duplicate; there is already one in the usual place nearer the top of the file. Indeed! Will remove before commit. Otherwise looks good, but I haven't tested. Anyone else, comments? OK? -- Best Regards Edd

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-23 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2014 Nov 23 (Sun) at 20:45:40 + (+), Edd Barrett wrote: :On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:34:56PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: : This DISTNAME is a duplicate; there is already one in the usual place : nearer the top of the file. : :Indeed! Will remove before commit. : : Otherwise looks

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Peter Hessler
I ended up creating basically the same patch, this is OK from me. I like sthen's comment to move the GH_COMMIT next to the MODPY_EGG_VERSION, as well. (also adding the MAINTAINER to the email list) On 2014 Oct 30 (Thu) at 22:08:13 + (+), Edd Barrett wrote: :Hey, : :Update to

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Pierre-Emmanuel André
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:42:23AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: I ended up creating basically the same patch, this is OK from me. I like sthen's comment to move the GH_COMMIT next to the MODPY_EGG_VERSION, as well. (also adding the MAINTAINER to the email list) Looks good to me. ok pea

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Edd Barrett said: +GH_TAGNAME = v${MODPY_EGG_VERSION} +GH_COMMIT = 7770b5ff73737d1269eb1ba7554b8d3486c7f5ec Does it make sense to include both? Tags are supposed to identify commit reliably... -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com writes: Edd Barrett said: +GH_TAGNAME =v${MODPY_EGG_VERSION} +GH_COMMIT = 7770b5ff73737d1269eb1ba7554b8d3486c7f5ec Does it make sense to include both? Tags are supposed to identify commit reliably... I don't think that tags are reliable. You

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/11/20 10:23, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com writes: Edd Barrett said: +GH_TAGNAME = v${MODPY_EGG_VERSION} +GH_COMMIT = 7770b5ff73737d1269eb1ba7554b8d3486c7f5ec Does it make sense to include both? Tags are supposed to identify

UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-10-30 Thread Edd Barrett
Hey, Update to offlineimap. I have been running this for a while now. No issues. First time I have used GH_*, so please check carefully. OK? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/edd/cvsync/ports/mail/offlineimap/Makefile,v

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-10-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/10/30 22:08, Edd Barrett wrote: Hey, Update to offlineimap. I have been running this for a while now. No issues. First time I have used GH_*, so please check carefully. OK? Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: Update mail/offlineimap to 4.0.16

2007-02-08 Thread Felix kronlage
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:28:10AM +, Laurence Tratt wrote: hi, An update from Offlineimap 4.0.11 to 4.0.16 (if nothing else, the distribution site for new OfflineIMAPs finally has a reasonable amount of bandwidth). Tested on i386 and amd64, both -current. indeed, works flawlessly here

Update mail/offlineimap to 4.0.16

2007-02-07 Thread Laurence Tratt
An update from Offlineimap 4.0.11 to 4.0.16 (if nothing else, the distribution site for new OfflineIMAPs finally has a reasonable amount of bandwidth). Tested on i386 and amd64, both -current. Laurie diff -ur offlineimap/Makefile offlineimap-n/Makefile --- offlineimap/MakefileSat Jun

Update mail/offlineimap to 4.0.11

2006-03-28 Thread Laurence Tratt
A small update from Offlineimap 4.0.8 to 4.0.11. Tested on i386 and amd64, both -current. Note that when you're downloading Offlineimap, it seems that the HTTP server doesn't report the size of the file to download, so ftp doesn't use a progress bar. As on my machines it downloads at about 3Kb/s