diff --git a/mail/sylpheed/Makefile b/mail/sylpheed/Makefile
index 92bf15f0f54..854233d4e97 100644
--- a/mail/sylpheed/Makefile
+++ b/mail/sylpheed/Makefile
@@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
COMMENT = lightweight and user-friendly e-mail client
-DISTNAME = sylpheed-3.6.0
-REVISION =
> Hi,
>
> exactly I didn't see this.
>
> Are you ok with this diff?
>
> Cheers,
>
This is perfect! Thanks for the update. Please commit.
amit
On 09/01/17 15:58, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Remi Pointel wrote:
Hi,
this is the diff to update Sylpheed to latest release.
Ok?
Cheers,
Remi.
I do believe that patch-libsylph_ssl_c can go away, as it was
integrated upstream more than 6 months ago.
From the re
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Remi Pointel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update Sylpheed to latest release.
>
> Ok?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Remi.
I do believe that patch-libsylph_ssl_c can go away, as it was
integrated upstream more than 6 months ago.
>From the release notes:
Unix: the search
Hi,
this is the diff to update Sylpheed to latest release.
Ok?
Cheers,
Remi.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.115
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.115 Makefile
--- Makefile 26 Jul 2017 22
> > > > SHARED_LIBS += sylph-0 3.0 #
> > > > 3.0 SHARED_LIBS += sylpheed-plugin-0 3.0
> > > > # 3.0
> > >
> > > I was surprised to see these not change between 3.4.x and 3.5.x, but
> > > indeed, shared-libs.log suggests they are correct. Wh
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 05:15:20PM +0200, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> Other than that, looks good ports-wise. ok danj@ with the nit
And ok edd@ with Daniel's input.
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:53:06 -0500, Amit Kulkarni
wrote:
> >
> > > SHARED_LIBS += sylph-0 3.0 #
> > > 3.0 SHARED_LIBS +=sylpheed-plugin-0 3.0
> > > # 3.0
> >
> > I was surprised to see these not change between 3.4.x and 3.5.x, but
> > ind
> > Thanks for fixing sylpheed to work with gmail!
>
> No worries.
>
> > If nobody objects, I can take maintainer of this port.
>
> If you care about Sylpheed, please do take MAINTAINER.
Ok thanks
>
> > SHARED_LIBS += sylph-0 3.0 # 3.0
> > SHARED_LIBS +=
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:03:39AM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> Thanks for fixing sylpheed to work with gmail!
No worries.
> If nobody objects, I can take maintainer of this port.
If you care about Sylpheed, please do take MAINTAINER.
> SHARED_LIBS += sylph-0
Edd,
Thanks for fixing sylpheed to work with gmail! If nobody objects, I can take
maintainer of this port.
Thanks
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -p -r1.110 Makef
Hi,
this is the diff to update sylpheed to latest release with my patch in addition
to avoid few segfaults (more information:
http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/redmine/issues/215).
ok?
Remi.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:01:15AM +0200, Remi Pointel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update Sylpheed to 3.4.1.
>
> Ok?
Your patch + some fixes. OK juanfra@
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,
This had MS-DOS line endings. Otherwise the diff looks similar to the one I
have for 3.4 beta4. Looks good on amd64.
thanks
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Remi Pointel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update Sylpheed to 3.4.1.
>
> Ok?
>
> Remi.
>
Hi,
this is the diff to update Sylpheed to 3.4.1.
Ok?
Remi.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -u -p -r1.102 Makefile
--- Makefile20 Aug 2013 22:30:37 - 1.1
On 2013/09/20 07:12, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:33:02 +0200
> Remi Pointel wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is the diff to update sylpheed to 3.3.0.
> >
> > Are you ok?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Remi.
>
>
> 3.4.0 is going to come out soon. I am running 3.4 beta5...
>
> Please
On 2013/09/20 09:33, Remi Pointel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update sylpheed to 3.3.0.
This diff is against an out-of-date tree, you have Makefile 1.98, current is
1.102
> SHARED_LIBS += sylph-0 2.1 # 2.1
> SHARED_LIBS += sylpheed-plugin
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:33:02 +0200
Remi Pointel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update sylpheed to 3.3.0.
>
> Are you ok?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Remi.
3.4.0 is going to come out soon. I am running 3.4 beta5...
Please remove the extra PERMIT_* lines. Just keeping the PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=
Y
Hi,
this is the diff to update sylpheed to 3.3.0.
Are you ok?
Cheers,
Remi.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.98
diff -u -p -r1.98 Makefile
--- Makefile12 Jul 2012 20:17:45
simple update... formatting it so it lines up nicely in the Makefile.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.98
diff -u -p -r1.98 Makefile
--- Makefile12 Jul 2012 20:17:45 -
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:07:42 +1000
Brett wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:50:56 +0200
> Remi Pointel wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is the diff to update Sylpheed to 3.2.0.
> >
> > Are you ok?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Remi.
>
>
> Hi Remi,
>
> Should this diff also remove the patches from the
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 09:50:56 +0200
Remi Pointel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the diff to update Sylpheed to 3.2.0.
>
> Are you ok?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Remi.
Hi Remi,
Should this diff also remove the patches from the old port? For me, this would
not build until I deleted them. Apart from that its w
Hi,
this is the diff to update Sylpheed to 3.2.0.
Are you ok?
Cheers,
Remi.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -p -r1.95 Makefile
--- Makefile30 Aug 2011 06:54:11
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 07:15:38 -0500
Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> simple update. just sorted WANTLIB due to addition of ffi. am using sylpheed
> since alpine had problems sending email. is that sorted out now?
>
> thanks
>
> COMMENT =lightweight and user-friendly e-mail client
>
> -DI
simple update. just sorted WANTLIB due to addition of ffi. am using sylpheed
since alpine had problems sending email. is that sorted out now?
thanks
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revisi
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:47:25 +0100
"Federico G. Schwindt" wrote:
> Update to 3.1.2.
> OK?
I'm OK, I was waiting the final 3.2.0 release to purpose a diff.
If someone wants to test the beta, you could download the diff:
http://openbsd.xiri.fr/ports/sylpheed-3.2.0beta3.diff
Cheers,
Remi.
Update to 3.1.2.
OK?
f.-
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -p -r1.95 Makefile
--- Makefile30 Aug 2011 06:54:11 - 1.95
+++ Makefile11 Sep 2011 15:26:39
Hi,
this is the diff to update sylpheed to last release: 3.1.1.
Is it ok ?
Cheers,
Remi.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.92
diff -u -p -r1.92 Makefile
--- Makefile
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:15:58AM +0200, Remi Pointel wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:10:14 +0200
> Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:16:12PM +0200, Remi Pointel wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:32:31 -0500
> > > Frank Garcia wrote:
> > > > I can't speak for the style of the
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:10:14 +0200
Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:16:12PM +0200, Remi Pointel wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:32:31 -0500
> > Frank Garcia wrote:
> > > I can't speak for the style of the port, but it compiles & works on
> > > macppc (OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENE
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:16:12PM +0200, Remi Pointel wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:32:31 -0500
> Frank Garcia wrote:
> > I can't speak for the style of the port, but it compiles & works on macppc
> > (OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENERIC) #139: Sun Oct 3 07:53:42 MDT 2010
> > dera...@macppc.openbsd
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:32:31 -0500
Frank Garcia wrote:
> I can't speak for the style of the port, but it compiles & works on macppc
> (OpenBSD 4.8-current (GENERIC) #139: Sun Oct 3 07:53:42 MDT 2010
> dera...@macppc.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/macppc/compile/GENERIC)
>
> I connected to my ma
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:30:43 +0200
Remi Pointel wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:02:32 +0200
> remi.poin...@xiri.fr wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > sylpheed in port tree is in version 2.7.1. Actual release is 3.0.3, so I
> > have ported it.
> >
> > I used the patch in port tree for 2.7.1 to 3.0.3, an
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:02:32 +0200
remi.poin...@xiri.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sylpheed in port tree is in version 2.7.1. Actual release is 3.0.3, so I have
> ported it.
>
> I used the patch in port tree for 2.7.1 to 3.0.3, and I set --enable-gpgme in
> default install (now just compface is a poss
Hello,
sylpheed in port tree is in version 2.7.1. Actual release is 3.0.3, so I have
ported it.
I used the patch in port tree for 2.7.1 to 3.0.3, and I set --enable-gpgme in
default install (now just compface is a possible flavor).
Critical positive or negative would be appreciated ;-).
Few i
>
> Could you try this one? It looks like the same, but it's the result of
> cvs diff -u > patch instead of copy/paste from vi and it works fine here.
>
Hi. If this is the same port you sent me off-list, then it works fine.
I'm using it now (amd64).
Thanks.
Thomas,
Could you try this one? It looks like the same, but it's the result of cvs diff
-u > patch instead of copy/paste from vi and it works fine here.
Thanks.
patch
Description: Binary data
Patch fails to apply for me.
$ patch -p0 < diff
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Index: Makefile
|===
|RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
|retrieving re
I forget one thing. Here's V2 ;)
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -r1.79 Makefile
--- Makefile29 Jun 2008 20:44:52 - 1.79
+++ Makefile26 Sep 2008 18:16
Here's an update to mail/sylpheed.
Comments? OK's?
I also noticed that there is no maintainer at this moment and i'm interested,
how should i proceed?
Thanks,
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retri
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 23:40:09 +
Rui Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here's an update to mail/sylpheed.
>
> fixes remote execution of arbitrary code:
> http://secunia.com/advisories/27379/
>
> ok?
Yes
Damien
here's an update to mail/sylpheed.
fixes remote execution of arbitrary code:
http://secunia.com/advisories/27379/
ok?
Regards,
rui
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u
Updated to 2.4.5:
* The vulnerability that may be exploited by malicious POP3 server was
fixed (SA26550).
* The potential crash bug in address completion was fixed.
* The signature separator '--' is not joined on line wrapping now.
Since 2.4.4:
* Reply and forward marks are append
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 01:24:54PM +0400, Vlad Glagolev wrote:
> Changelog:
> # Reply and forward marks are appended after messages are actually sent.
> # The feature to reply to attached message/rfc822 messages was added.
> # When a folder is renamed, the path of junk folder is also updated.
> # A
Changelog:
# Reply and forward marks are appended after messages are actually sent.
# The feature to reply to attached message/rfc822 messages was added.
# When a folder is renamed, the path of junk folder is also updated.
# A workaround for the error which occurs with Gmail SMTP server was made.
45 matches
Mail list logo
