CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY makes no sense anymore since we're
using Ninja.
Ok?
Index: cmake.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/cmake/cmake.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.35 cmake.port.mk
--- cmake
On 2015/01/07 06:16, David Coppa wrote:
>
> CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY makes no sense anymore since we're
> using Ninja.
We don't use Ninja on all arch.
> From: Stuart Henderson
> Date: Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Zap CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY
> To: dco...@gmail.com
> Cc: ports@openbsd.org, z...@openbsd.org
>
>
> On 2015/01/07 06:16, David Coppa wrote:
> >
> > CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_A
On 2015/01/07 07:53, David Coppa wrote:
>
> > From: Stuart Henderson
> > Date: Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:26 PM
> > Subject: Re: Zap CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY
> > To: dco...@gmail.com
> > Cc: ports@openbsd.org, z...@openbsd.org
> >
> >
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/01/07 07:53, David Coppa wrote:
>>
>> > From: Stuart Henderson
>> > Date: Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:26 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Zap CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY
>> > To: dco...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:41:16PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Actually what is the benefit of using CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY
> > anyway, even in the make(1) case?
> >
>
> It was requested by Vadim some years ago:
>
> "T
2015-01-07 19:14 GMT+03:00 Florian Stinglmayr :
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:41:16PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >
>> > Hmm. Actually what is the benefit of using
>> > CMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY
>> > anyway, even in the make(1) ca
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> Also, I don't see any problem with having
> -DCMAKE_SKIP_INSTALL_ALL_DEPENDENCY until all ports on all archs stop
> using make backend. David, what do you want to achieve (except
> shrinking cmake.port.mk, which is nice itself, of course)?
Ye
