On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:16:20PM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:36:23AM +0100, Nikolay Sturm wrote:
* Peter Valchev [2006-02-13]:
The above is clearly a bugfix and should be a priority to fix for 3.9.
In fact it is exactly this type of changes that people
* steven mestdagh [2006-02-16]:
it builds on sparc64. if anyone can give me something useful to test
it with... or if you want to inspect the build log, let me know.
Beware, I saw build pathes hardcoded into some erlang scripts.
Nikolay
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:36:23AM +0100, Nikolay Sturm wrote:
* Peter Valchev [2006-02-13]:
The above is clearly a bugfix and should be a priority to fix for 3.9.
In fact it is exactly this type of changes that people should be
looking at right now!
I am on it.
I've just tried what was
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of steven mestdagh
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 09:16
To: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: any erlang ports? (otp r10bX)
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:36:23AM +0100, Nikolay Sturm wrote:
* Peter
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:22:36PM +0100, steven mestdagh wrote:
[...]
And I agree with Hannah, please commit this port as is, since it's
much better than the one currently in the ports tree, it's just broken
and old.
I think now is not the right time to bring in more updates, as
I think now is not the right time to bring in more updates, as has been
asked by a few people already. We like to get a port right before
committing it. 'Anything is better than...' does not make sense to me.
I suggest you finetune the erlang port after tree lock and then it can
get the
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:56:58PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 06:28:44PM -0500, Todd C. Miller wrote:
The following appears to work for me. I'm not really familiar
with erlang--I was just hoping to get ejabberd working...
Diff against the port you sent follows.
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:57:10PM +0100, Jon Olsson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 07:33:35PM +0100, Jon Olsson wrote:
[snip]
Sorry for the late reply. Just want to chime in here and confirm that
the erlang port millert posted + Hannahs patches works fine for me on OpenBSD
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 06:28:44PM -0500, Todd C. Miller wrote:
The following appears to work for me. I'm not really familiar
with erlang--I was just hoping to get ejabberd working...
Huh. For me, the patch patch-erts_etc_common_Install doesn't apply,
because there's no file named
i was wondering if anyone would know of a newer erlang port then that residing
in ports. even the current port segfaults when you try executing erl (tried on
2 generic 3.8-stable machines) (same goes for the package as well)
i cant find 47.7.0 on the erlang site at all, which is whats in
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Zachery Hostens wrote:
i was wondering if anyone would know of a newer erlang port then that
residing in ports. even the current port segfaults when you try executing
erl (tried on 2 generic 3.8-stable machines) (same goes for the package as
well)
11 matches
Mail list logo
