I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
(Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
that seems to block, one way or another, all of the other browsers
... anyone know of a browser I could build?
Thanks
On 2007/01/13 17:39, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
> that seems to block, one way or another, all of the other browsers
> ... anyone know of a browser I could bu
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/01/13 17:39, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
>> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
>> that seems to block, one way or another, all of the other browsers
>> ...
> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
> that seems to block
gecko* things currently won't run; i'm working on this. (should minimo &
friends be unmarked for arm till xptc(invoke|stubs) ar
> I need to zero in on a better way to search out ports. I am still getting
> used to OpenBSD, but the size of the ports directories makes my favorite
> trick (using find on all the DESCR files) just isn't practical. I hadn't
> even seen the konq-e one, even though I was in the right parent dir (
Martynas Venckus wrote:
>> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
>> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
>> that seems to block
>>
>
> gecko* things currently won't run; i'm working on this. (should minimo &
> friends be unm
> I don't care too much for the textual browsers, so I;m going after
> konq-e now.
Oh; then be clear when you're asking.
Anyway,
$ cd /usr/ports/www/links+ && make show=COMMENT
"graphics and text browser with javascript support"
--
Martynas Venckus
Martynas Venckus wrote:
>> I don't care too much for the textual browsers, so I;m going after
>> konq-e now.
>>
>
> Oh; then be clear when you're asking.
>
> Anyway,
>
> $ cd /usr/ports/www/links+ && make show=COMMENT
> "graphics and text browser with javascript support"
>
>
Well, if I know
> A LONG time back, when FreeBSD oirts were new, I'd played about with a
> method of
> allowing ports to have a set of attached KEYWORDS, which would allow you
> to
> be a lot more sophisticated about smart searching. No one was really
> interested, so the
> idea died, although the coding is truly
Martynas Venckus wrote:
>> A LONG time back, when FreeBSD oirts were new, I'd played about with a
>> method of
>> allowing ports to have a set of attached KEYWORDS, which would allow you
>> to
>> be a lot more sophisticated about smart searching. No one was really
>> interested, so the
>> idea die
I know you are looking for a web browser but if you have a seprate
computer this may help
http://ports.openbsd.nu/
I find all of my ports this way
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 1/13/07, Martynas Venckus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A LONG time back, when FreeBSD oirts were new, I'd played about with a
>
> Was that supposed to be a negaitve comment?
What? No, it's just my opinion. I mean, i won't use such feature.
> I would code up a short python script
> that would use A scire-card-like approach, and give you a much better
> chance of
> getting the data you wanted witha minimum of lost time.
Go
Martynas Venckus wrote:
I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
(Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
that seems to block
gecko* things currently won't run; i'm working on this. (should minimo &
friends be unmarked for arm
Sure; basically any non-gecko product. e.g. lynx; w3c; konqueror;
konqueror-embedded; links+; elinks, dillo.
--
Martynas Venckus
konqueror-embedded is another port which no longer works correctly on
the Z! So basically you are stuck with elinks, dillo, links, links+,
amaya, and lynx.
J
Jesse Scott wrote:
> Martynas Venckus wrote:
>>> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the
>>> Zaurus
>>> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
>>> that seems to block
>>>
>>
>> gecko* things currently won't run; i'm working on this. (s
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
> that seems to block, one way or another, all of the other browsers
> ... anyone know of a browser I could b
Chuck Robey wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/01/13 17:39, Chuck Robey wrote:
I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
(Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
that seems to block, one way or another, all of the othe
17 matches
Mail list logo
