Re: burp - experience and 2.1 version

2018-02-22 Thread Jiri B
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:08:02PM -0500, Jiri B wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:05:00PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018/02/22 04:59, Jiri B wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:21:54AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > As for the update itself, i have no opinion. You decided

Re: burp - experience and 2.1 version

2018-02-22 Thread Jiri B
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:05:00PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/02/22 04:59, Jiri B wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:21:54AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > As for the update itself, i have no opinion. You decided to use 2.1 on > > > your clients, you assume the choice... > > >

Re: burp - experience and 2.1 version

2018-02-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/02/22 04:59, Jiri B wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:21:54AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > As for the update itself, i have no opinion. You decided to use 2.1 on > > your clients, you assume the choice... > > Do you want to keep old stable? Should I create new 'branch' > for 2.1.x or

Re: burp - experience and 2.1 version

2018-02-22 Thread Jiri B
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:21:54AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > As for the update itself, i have no opinion. You decided to use 2.1 on > your clients, you assume the choice... Do you want to keep old stable? Should I create new 'branch' for 2.1.x or just update current port? Jiri

Re: burp - experience and 2.1 version

2018-02-22 Thread Landry Breuil
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:07:37AM -0500, Jiri B wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:20:15AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > The 2.1 branch was only declared stable recently, and this discussion > > already happened in https://marc.info/?t=15181794432=1=2 > > > > Landry > > I'll send my diff

Re: burp - experience and 2.1 version

2018-02-22 Thread Jiri B
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:20:15AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > The 2.1 branch was only declared stable recently, and this discussion > already happened in https://marc.info/?t=15181794432=1=2 > > Landry I'll send my diff for update the port because of this issue:

Re: burp - experience and 2.1 version

2018-02-21 Thread Landry Breuil
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:22:33PM -0500, Jiri B wrote: > Hi guys, > > landry@ added burp[1] into ports and while searching for > something easier that bacula/bareos for disk-based backups, > I found burp and read 'Migrating from Bacula to Burp'[2]. > > What are you experiences with burp? I

burp - experience and 2.1 version

2018-02-20 Thread Jiri B
Hi guys, landry@ added burp[1] into ports and while searching for something easier that bacula/bareos for disk-based backups, I found burp and read 'Migrating from Bacula to Burp'[2]. What are you experiences with burp? Are you staying with ports version (2.0.54) because it was said to be (old)