On 2011-04-25, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 07:46:36PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2011-04-25, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:18:54PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
>> >> add all the possible flavor combinations in @pkgpath, thanks
>> >
>>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 07:46:36PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-04-25, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:18:54PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> >> add all the possible flavor combinations in @pkgpath, thanks
> >
> >> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n
> >> +@pkgpa
On 2011-04-25, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:18:54PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
>> add all the possible flavor combinations in @pkgpath, thanks
>
>> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n
>> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n,rplay
>> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n,debug
>> +@p
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:37:35PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> Is alphabetic order important when listing possible flavors? Just
> wondering should debug be before rplay, or does order not matter?
actually 'd' is even before 'i' in alphabet, so debug before i18n.
--
best regards
q#
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:18:54PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> add all the possible flavor combinations in @pkgpath, thanks
> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n
> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n,rplay
> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n,debug
> +@pkgpath x11/fvwm2,-fvwm2,i18n,rplay,debug
> +@pkg
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:18:54PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:44:08PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:36:24PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:28:51PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> >
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:44:08PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:36:24PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:28:51PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:34:53PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 08:36:24PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:28:51PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:34:53PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > > On Th
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:28:51PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:34:53PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > On Thu Apr 07, 2011 at 11:23:41PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:34:53PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > On Thu Apr 07, 2011 at 11:23:41PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok. Try this, fix @pkgpath in PLIST-* (based on comment pvalchev@)
> > >
> >
> >
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu Apr 07, 2011 at 11:23:41PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> >
> > Ok. Try this, fix @pkgpath in PLIST-* (based on comment pvalchev@)
> >
>
> OK, some new infos fvwm 2.6.0 has been released. Result:
>
> Latest Stable Rele
On Thu Apr 07, 2011 at 11:23:41PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
>
> Ok. Try this, fix @pkgpath in PLIST-* (based on comment pvalchev@)
>
OK, some new infos fvwm 2.6.0 has been released. Result:
Latest Stable Release: 2.6.0
Latest Unstable Release: 2.7.0
I will try it with this versions!
Raf
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:25:08PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Mon Apr 04, 2011 at 11:16:50PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:49:33PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:32:20PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 20
On Mon Apr 04, 2011 at 11:16:50PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:49:33PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:32:20PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri Mar 18, 2011
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:49:33PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:32:20PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> > >> I prepared diff update
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:32:20PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski
> wrote:
> > On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> >> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@)
> >>
> >> current x11/fvwm2
On Wed Mar 23, 2011 at 06:07:27PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Peter Valchev wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> >>> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Peter Valchev wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski
> wrote:
>> On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
>>> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@)
>>>
>>> current x11/fvwm2 - 2.4.20 (
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
>> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@)
>>
>> current x11/fvwm2 - 2.4.20 (stable branch)
>> last version fvwm2 - 2.5.31 (unstable branch)
>
On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@)
>
> current x11/fvwm2 - 2.4.20 (stable branch)
> last version fvwm2 - 2.5.31 (unstable branch)
>
> mikeb@ work with 2.5, no regression found.
>
> What shoul
time. Now, I'm looking for a new fvwm-devel (2.5.x) port.
> > Does
> > anyone have an unofficial port for me?
> >
> > I would be glad if someone could help me.
> >
> > Rafael Sadowski
> >
> > [1]: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&
On Mon Jan 24, 2011 at 05:10:08PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hello ports@,
>
> long time ago Benoit Chesneau published a fvwm-devel port on ports@. I used
> this
> port for a long time. Now, I'm looking for a new fvwm-devel (2.5.x) port. Does
> anyone have an unoffic
Hello ports@,
long time ago Benoit Chesneau published a fvwm-devel port on ports@. I used this
port for a long time. Now, I'm looking for a new fvwm-devel (2.5.x) port. Does
anyone have an unofficial port for me?
I would be glad if someone could help me.
Rafael Sadowski
[1]:
23 matches
Mail list logo