On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:53:14PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Saturday 09 October 2010 16:33:38 Matthias Kilian wrote:
Is there any reason why this shouldn't use freeglut (instead of
glut)?
Hmm. Is there a consensus to always use either of the two? Freeglut does
seem like the better
On Sunday 10 October 2010 01:00:48 Matthias Kilian wrote:
So ok to switch supertuxkart to freeglut? I've stress-tested it on
amd64 ;-)
Ciao,
Kili
Yep. :)
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:28:32AM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
Freeglut Maintainer here: Nothing should depend on glut. If it doesn't
work with freeglut, it was probably written in 1993 and never touched
since. So please, switch it over :)
It works with freeglut. My wrist still hurts from my
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:53:14PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Saturday 09 October 2010 16:33:38 Matthias Kilian wrote:
Is there any reason why this shouldn't use freeglut (instead of
glut)?
Hmm. Is there a consensus to always use either of the two? Freeglut does
seem like the better
On Saturday 09 October 2010 16:33:38 Matthias Kilian wrote:
Is there any reason why this shouldn't use freeglut (instead of
glut)?
Hmm. Is there a consensus to always use either of the two? Freeglut does
seem like the better solution to me, but since glut and freeglut
conflict, I think we
Is there any reason why this shouldn't use freeglut (instead of glut)?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/games/supertuxkart/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile
--- Makefile6 Oct 2010
