Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-02-13 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:05:59PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014/02/13 08:01, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote: > > It would be great to have some haskell-based stuff back for 5.5, like darcs > > for example, which build fails now with: > > Unlikely, to be honest. hs-vector gets sligh

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-02-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/02/13 08:01, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote: > It would be great to have some haskell-based stuff back for 5.5, like darcs > for example, which build fails now with: Unlikely, to be honest. hs-vector gets slightly further if ghc is built with the diff below, but still fails: Loading p

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-02-12 Thread Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 10:44:49PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:52:51PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 09:38:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > devel/hasktags: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to > > > load package `

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
I've fixed/worked-around some more. Failures from the last build: emulators/dosbox - see diff sent earlier sysutils/grub - see diff sent earlier multimedia/avidemux - could probably switch to non asm code, or use no-pie games/openarena - will probably need no-pie or rewriting asm games/megaglest/

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-07 Thread David Coppa
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Stuart Henderson writes: > >> On 2014/01/03 00:06, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:16:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >>> > > lang/petite-chez: undefined reference to `__guard' >>> > >>

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-07 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Stuart Henderson writes: > On 2014/01/03 00:06, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:16:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> > > lang/petite-chez: undefined reference to `__guard' >> > >> > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS =i386 >> > >> > Hmm, FreeBSD has a port of 8.

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/01/03 00:06, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:16:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > lang/petite-chez: undefined reference to `__guard' > > > > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS =i386 > > > > Hmm, FreeBSD has a port of 8.4 that at least adds amd64. > > Th

lang/petite-chez (was: Re: i386 bulk build failures)

2014-01-03 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > > lang/petite-chez: undefined reference to `__guard' > > > > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS =i386 > > > > Hmm, FreeBSD has a port of 8.4 that at least adds amd64. > > The license of Petite Chez is weird and the port is very outdated. We > have better scheme in

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:19:57PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > I Haven't seen them in the bulk build i ran with the swig update diff.. > Hm, in fact i hadnt seen those failures because for some reason dpb > didnt try building those pkgpaths for reasons unknown to me. Yay dpb. Surprisingly eno

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:16:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > lang/nhc98: segfaults in build > > NOT_FOR_ARCHS= ${LP64_ARCHS} powerpc > BROKEN-hppa=Segfault during build since the PIE switch > > Do we need this for bootstrapping or reference purposes

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Landry Breuil
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:58:55PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 01:52:03PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > Not sure about cause yet, some may be PIE-related too: > > > > These are not: > > > > > lang/gcc/4.8: gcj: fatal error: ca

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 04:52:51PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 09:38:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > devel/hasktags: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to load > > package `integer-gmp' > > devel/hs-ghc-paths: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 1

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 09:38:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > devel/hasktags: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to load > package `integer-gmp' > devel/hs-ghc-paths: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to > load package `integer-gmp' I'll update my i386 test

tedu lang/nhc98 (was: i386 bulk build failures)

2014-01-02 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:16:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > lang/nhc98: segfaults in build > > NOT_FOR_ARCHS= ${LP64_ARCHS} powerpc > BROKEN-hppa=Segfault during build since the PIE switch > > Do we need this for bootstrapping or reference purposes or can we > just remove it?

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Stuart Henderson wrote: > lang/nhc98: segfaults in build NOT_FOR_ARCHS= ${LP64_ARCHS} powerpc BROKEN-hppa=Segfault during build since the PIE switch Do we need this for bootstrapping or reference purposes or can we just remove it? > lang/petite-chez: undefined reference to `__guard' ONLY

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:58:55PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > mail/zarafa/zarafa: 'SWIG_From_long' was not declared in this scope > > > textproc/redland-bindings: -php4 is no longer supported. > > > > Also on amd64. Likely fallout from the devel/swig update a week > > ago. > > I Haven't s

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Landry Breuil
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 01:52:03PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Not sure about cause yet, some may be PIE-related too: > > These are not: > > > lang/gcc/4.8: gcj: fatal error: can't specify '-D' without '--main' > > Sporadic build failure; also happens on

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Stuart Henderson wrote: > Not sure about cause yet, some may be PIE-related too: These are not: > lang/gcc/4.8: gcj: fatal error: can't specify '-D' without '--main' Sporadic build failure; also happens on amd64. > mail/zarafa/zarafa: 'SWIG_From_long' was not declared in this scope > textproc

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-02 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 09:38:48PM +, Stuart Henderson said that > Following are PIE-related, in some cases use of -fomit-frame-pointer for i386 > may help, others will need more. > > devel/hasktags: unhandled ELF relocation(Rel) type 10, ghc: unable to load > package `integer-gmp' > dev

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-01 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 09:38:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Quick summary of the failures in the last i386 bulk build. > Java ports are now broken on i386 as a result of JDK problems. > > www/chromium,proprietary: 'chrome/common/extensions/api/runtime.h' file not > found > - this is possi

i386 bulk build failures

2014-01-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
Quick summary of the failures in the last i386 bulk build. Java ports are now broken on i386 as a result of JDK problems. www/chromium,proprietary: 'chrome/common/extensions/api/runtime.h' file not found - this is possibly the missing interdependency that espie just fixed. Following are PIE-rela

Re: i386 bulk build failures 2012-03-27

2012-03-28 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:48:31PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Antoine Jacoutot: > > > > These suffer an #error "only can be included directly": > > > x11/hs-gtk > > > x11/mono-gtk2 > > > > Known but I am not able to build either ghc nor mono > > The offending parts are > >

Re: i386 bulk build failures 2012-03-27

2012-03-28 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Antoine Jacoutot: > > These suffer an #error "only can be included directly": > > x11/hs-gtk > > x11/mono-gtk2 > > Known but I am not able to build either ghc nor mono The offending parts are #include #include and #include respectively. These should just be #include , righ

Re: i386 bulk build failures 2012-03-27

2012-03-28 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:31:02PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Between lingering thread issues, an X11 update, and the GNOME churn, > there are a few build errors: > > These suffer an #error "only can be included directly": > x11/hs-gtk > x11/mono-gtk2 Known but I am not able to bui

i386 bulk build failures 2012-03-27

2012-03-28 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Between lingering thread issues, an X11 update, and the GNOME churn, there are a few build errors: These suffer an #error "only can be included directly": x11/hs-gtk x11/mono-gtk2 These run afoul of a deprecation warning in Xlib.h: x11/icewm x11/sclock For icewm, I'm not sure if some #i

Re: i386 bulk build failures

2011-03-18 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Here's the fallout from the first post-4.9 package snapshot build > on i386: > > graphics/enblend-enfuse enfuse.info not built > graphics/pdfmod "cannot convert type" I fixed pdfmod this morning. -- Ant

i386 bulk build failures

2011-03-18 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Here's the fallout from the first post-4.9 package snapshot build on i386: graphics/enblend-enfuse enfuse.info not built graphics/pdfmod "cannot convert type" misc/p5-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel old version 0.2603 > 0.58 sysutils/ruby-rails-app-installe