* Ian McWilliam [2005-10-05]:
> And how is that any different from say plump3p0, if it ever existed?
That's not a valid package name.
>From misc/amanda/Makefile:
# Minor patched releases are usually named with a "pX" suffix.
# These names can not be used with the OpenBSD ports framework.
# PKGV
> And how is that any different from say plump3p0, if it ever existed?
> Should one really change the package name from the distro name to make
> it harder to tell what version is installed? Oh that's the whole idea by
> adding the p0 so it is an indicator of ports patch level. So if I remove
>
Ian McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And how is that any different from say plump3p0, if it ever existed?
[...]
> Just a thought.
Great. And now please fix this.
Alek
--
Stosunek wysokości człowieka do wysokości położenia jego pępka wynosi w
przybliżeniu 1,618 [ ~= (1+sqrt(5))/2 ], zgod
Aleksander Piotrowski wrote:
Ian McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Changes makefile and PLIST. Disregard previous port and use this one
for testing please.
I think that PKGNAME is wrong as p* suffix is used by our ports
infrastructure. So after bumping package name we would have
Ian McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changes makefile and PLIST. Disregard previous port and use this one
> for testing please.
I think that PKGNAME is wrong as p* suffix is used by our ports
infrastructure. So after bumping package name we would have
opendocman-1.2p3p0 (;
Alek
--
Stut
Changes makefile and PLIST. Disregard previous port and use this one
for testing please.
Ian McWilliam
opendocman.tgz
Description: Binary data
