ports!
I've bulk built a number of packages over the last week, and I often
run into the situation where building a package requires a dependency
(that ends up either being built or found on a mirror), but when make
tries to pkg_add the dependency, pkg_add fails saying it can't find
the target pac
On 2008/11/14 22:58, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> I've bulk built a number of packages over the last week, and I often
> run into the situation where building a package requires a dependency
> (that ends up either being built or found on a mirror), but when make
> tries to pkg_add the dependency, pkg_ad
On 2008/11/15 10:05, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/11/14 22:58, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> > I've bulk built a number of packages over the last week, and I often
> > run into the situation where building a package requires a dependency
> > (that ends up either being built or found on a mirror), bu
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/11/15 10:05, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2008/11/14 22:58, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
>> > I've bulk built a number of packages over the last week, and I often
>> > run into the situation where building a package re
Just an update, and some added info..
> alright.. let's retry the bulk build.. it continues past dbus, but
> dies again at dbus-glib. after installing dbus-glib from the ftp
> package.. the bulk build continues.
>
> the example I've included here is from my work yesterday (with a clean
> ports tr
On 2008/11/18 09:09, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> FETCH_PACKAGES=yes
this doesn't make much sense for a bulk build. you're building
packages yourself, why would you want to use packages from,
in all likelihood, 5+ days ago to fulfil dependencies? some of
them won't even match the ports tree or your b
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/11/18 09:09, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
>> FETCH_PACKAGES=yes
>
> this doesn't make much sense for a bulk build. you're building
> packages yourself, why would you want to use packages from,
> in all likelihood, 5+
On 2008/11/18 17:34, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2008/11/18 09:09, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> >> FETCH_PACKAGES=yes
> >
> > this doesn't make much sense for a bulk build. you're building
> > packages yourself, why would
< snip >
>>
>> thanks for the references. viq pointed me towards dpb earlier today, I
>> still need to read into how it functions. My only outstanding question
>> is if it accepts a list of packages to build, or simply builds
>> everything.
>
> It can accept a SUBDIRLIST, see the comments in the f
