Given this:
http://blogs.adobe.com/adobereader/2012/06/one-year-from-now-adobe-reader-and-acrobat-9-eol.html
Adobe has discontinued the support of Adobe Reader for Linux in June
2013, and the fact that our port is even older (v7.x)...
Can we finally put print/acroread to the Attic?
There're a l
Who uses this?
Opinions?
ciao,
David
On 27 October 2014 12:08, David Coppa wrote:
> Given this:
>
> http://blogs.adobe.com/adobereader/2012/06/one-year-from-now-adobe-reader-and-acrobat-9-eol.html
>
> Adobe has discontinued the support of Adobe Reader for Linux in June
> 2013, and the fact that our port is even older (v7.x)...
>
> Ca
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
wrote:
> On 27 October 2014 12:08, David Coppa wrote:
>> Given this:
>>
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/adobereader/2012/06/one-year-from-now-adobe-reader-and-acrobat-9-eol.html
>>
>> Adobe has discontinued the support of Adobe Reader for Linux in Jun
David Coppa, 27 Oct 2014 17:08:
> Given this:
>
> http://blogs.adobe.com/adobereader/2012/06/one-year-from-now-adobe-reader-and-acrobat-9-eol.html
>
> Adobe has discontinued the support of Adobe Reader for Linux in June
> 2013, and the fact that our port is even older (v7.x)...
>
> Can we finall
frantisek holop said:
> the devils advocate tonight:
> i think this should be asked on misc@ as well.
> i dont know how many of those alternatives
> can handle pdf forms correctly. having said that
> i have no idea if the ports version does.
FWIW MuPDF's homepage claims support for "form filling,
On 2014/10/27 20:28, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> frantisek holop said:
> > the devils advocate tonight:
> > i think this should be asked on misc@ as well.
> > i dont know how many of those alternatives
> > can handle pdf forms correctly. having said that
> > i have no idea if the ports version do
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:43:16PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/10/27 20:28, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > frantisek holop said:
> > > the devils advocate tonight:
> > > i think this should be asked on misc@ as well.
> > > i dont know how many of those alternatives
> > > can handle pdf
2014-10-27 21:34 GMT+01:00 Erling Westenvik :
>> > FWIW MuPDF's homepage claims support for "form filling, javascript and
>> > transitions".
>>
>> The form filling in mupdf didn't seem to be very useful when I last tried it.
>
> AFAIK, KDE4's "okular" is the best (only?) alternative when it comes t
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:34:15PM +0100, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 07:43:16PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2014/10/27 20:28, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > > frantisek holop said:
> > > > the devils advocate tonight:
> > > > i think this should be asked on misc@ as
Here's some minor cruft where acroread is mentioned. Worth keeping
or not?
print/a2ps/Makefile:
.for p in bzip2 gv ghostview dvips pdf2ps acroread tex latex ps2pdf \
bzip distill netscape html2ps grog convert
CONFIGURE_ENV+= ac_cv_prog_COM_$p=no
.endfor
print/cups-filters/Makef
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:35:52PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Here's some minor cruft where acroread is mentioned. Worth keeping
> or not?
Not worth keeping. You can drop them.
There were only added in case a user wanted acroread but without the need to
force a build depend.
> print/
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:35:52PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> Here's some minor cruft where acroread is mentioned. Worth keeping
>> or not?
>
> Not worth keeping. You can drop them.
> There were only added in case a user wanted
> From: Christian Weisgerber
> Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: tedu print/acroread
> To: ports@openbsd.org
>
>
> Here's some minor cruft where acroread is mentioned. Worth keeping
> or not?
>
> print/a2ps/Makefile:
> .for p in bzip2
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
> Who uses this?
Ironically, I was using it not all that long ago, because xpdf shit
its pants on about half the PDFs I was trying to read. But it doesn't
seem to be installed currently, so I haven't needed it recently.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
>> Who uses this?
>
> Ironically, I was using it not all that long ago, because xpdf shit
> its pants on about half the PDFs I was trying to read. But it doesn't
> seem to be installed currentl
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:48:45AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
> > Who uses this?
>
> Ironically, I was using it not all that long ago, because xpdf shit
> its pants on about half the PDFs I was trying to read. But it doesn't
> seem to be installe
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:00:06PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
> >> Who uses this?
> >
> > Ironically, I was using it not all that long ago, because xpdf shit
> > its pants on about half the P
On 24/04/12 5:17 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:00:06PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
Who uses this?
Ironically, I was using it not all that long ago, because xpdf shit
its pa
On 2012/04/24 16:54, Lawrence Teo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:48:45AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
> > > Who uses this?
> >
> > Ironically, I was using it not all that long ago, because xpdf shit
> > its pants on about half the PDFs I was
On 2012/04/24 23:17, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:00:06PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
> > >> Who uses this?
> > >
> > > Ironically, I was using it not all that long ago,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:54:24PM -0400, Lawrence Teo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:48:45AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
> > > Who uses this?
> >
> > Ironically, I was using it not all that long ago, because xpdf shit
> > its pants on about
On 04/24/2012 03:35 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/04/24 23:17, Marc Espie wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:00:06PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
Who uses this?
Ironically, I was using i
On 2012/04/25 19:16, russell wrote:
> On 04/24/2012 03:35 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >On 2012/04/24 23:17, Marc Espie wrote:
> >>On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:00:06PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa
On 2012/04/24 17:30, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 24/04/12 5:17 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:00:06PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> >>On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 17:03, David Coppa wrote:
> Who uses this?
> >>>
> >>>Ironically,
25 matches
Mail list logo
