Re: update: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML textproc/p5-XML-LibXSLT

2015-07-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 08:21:19PM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote: I don't know about the quirks or conflicts or that stuff either, so not sure if that part is right. On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:38:46PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS} Neither of these actually

Re: update: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML textproc/p5-XML-LibXSLT

2015-07-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:38:46PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: Hi, - update p5-XML-LibXML to 2.0121 - take maintainer - remove p5-XML-LibXML-Common - it has been merged into p5-XML-LibXML - mark package obsolete in quirks - update p5-XML-LibXSLT to 1.94 - old version is not

Re: update: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML textproc/p5-XML-LibXSLT

2015-07-02 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:38:46PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: - update p5-XML-LibXML to 2.0121 - take maintainer - remove p5-XML-LibXML-Common - it has been merged into p5-XML-LibXML - mark package obsolete in quirks - update p5-XML-LibXSLT to 1.94 - old version is not compatible

update: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML textproc/p5-XML-LibXSLT

2015-07-01 Thread Alexander Bluhm
Hi, - update p5-XML-LibXML to 2.0121 - take maintainer - remove p5-XML-LibXML-Common - it has been merged into p5-XML-LibXML - mark package obsolete in quirks - update p5-XML-LibXSLT to 1.94 - old version is not compatible with new p5-XML-LibXML - take maintainer ok? bluhm Index:

Re: update: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML textproc/p5-XML-LibXSLT

2015-07-01 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
Hi, On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:38:46PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.19 2014/06/14 23:26:02 sthen Exp $ +@conflict p5-XML-LibXML-Common-* I'm not sure, but should that PLIST change include @pkgpath marker for the removed port too? -- best regards q#

Re: update: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML textproc/p5-XML-LibXSLT

2015-07-01 Thread Andrew Fresh
I don't know about the quirks or conflicts or that stuff either, so not sure if that part is right. On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:38:46PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: BUILD_DEPENDS= ${RUN_DEPENDS} Neither of these actually seems to need this, they both build and package fine without. I'm