> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Yarusso
> Sent: Thursday, 30 October 2008 3:03 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Spam: IP not authorized
>
> We're having no end of trouble setting up a new server here,
> so I'm hoping someon
We're having no end of trouble setting up a new server here, so I'm
hoping someone can explain what's going on. Basically, we have a new
server that of course will generate messages from cron jobs, PHP
mailers, and that sort of thing, and we want them to be able to make
it out to people. To do so
Ryan Turnbull wrote:
Hello,
I'm just rebuilding one of our old servers here and I see that the
previous administrator was using the header_check, mime_header_check,
and access regex files from SecuritySage. I tried to go the security
sage site and it appears to be down, and most posts I ha
Hello,
I'm just rebuilding one of our old servers here and I see that the
previous administrator was using the header_check, mime_header_check,
and access regex files from SecuritySage. I tried to go the security
sage site and it appears to be down, and most posts I have seen out
there sup
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:04:27PM +0200, Ilo Lorusso wrote:
> perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join(":",getpwnam($_)) }' ipnoc
>
> -bash-3.2$
>
> nope.. not successfull, what does this mean?
Your MySQL (IIRC) nss module is misconfigured. Only root can do
passwd lookups. You must allow all users
On 10/29/2008, Joe Sloan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> All our production boxes are 100% reiserfs, and have been for some
> years, based on performance testing. They have been rock solid, and most
> of them have 800 day uptimes at this point. I did some performance
> comparisons a few months ago and
-bash-3.2$ perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join(":",getpwnam($_)) }' ipnoc
-bash-3.2$ whoami
sneak
-bash-3.2$ who am i
sneakpts/62008-10-29 23:10 (172.69.128.108)
-bash-3.2$
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Ilo Lorusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join("
perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join(":",getpwnam($_)) }' ipnoc
-bash-3.2$
nope.. not successfull, what does this mean?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:12:19PM +0200, Ilo Lorusso wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#perl -l
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Simone Felici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Hi Postfix-Users!
>>
>> I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
>> have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
>> also I would ask you...
>> Which filesystem do y
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:12:19PM +0200, Ilo Lorusso wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join(":",
> getpwnam($_)) }' ipnoc
>
> ipnoc:bb8mChsjCXn.c:5000:5000:/bin/bash
>
> So what now ?
Now repeat the experiment when not running as root. If it still works,
post
Ilo Lorusso:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join(":",
> getpwnam($_)) }' ipnoc
DO NOT RUN THE TEST AS ROOT.
Wietse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join(":",
getpwnam($_)) }' ipnoc
ipnoc:bb8mChsjCXn.c:5000:5000:/bin/bash
So what now ?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Ilo Lorusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah I just did a perl
>
> script which look like this
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
Guys, I'm still accepting
ideas. :D
Gustav Meirinho escreveu:
If it can not be done
at
the moment, all right (I found a similar request in 2006 - message
209338).
My real problem is this:
Many customers use mail groups (virtual_alias_maps). Each
destination acco
yeah I just did a perl
script which look like this
#!/usr/bin/perl
print getpwnam("ipnoc"),"\n";
and this was my output
===
ipnocbb8mChsjCXn.c50005000/bin/bash
===
everything looks right except for the colons missing between the fields..
is that cause of perl? or what?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 a
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:38:35PM -0200, Gustav Meirinho wrote:
>Try this:
>
># perl -e 'print getpwnam "username",$/'
A slightly more clean Perl "getent passwd" clone:
perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join(":", getpwnam($_)) }' "username" ...
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer:
Try this:
# perl -e 'print getpwnam "username",$/'
Ilo Lorusso escreveu:
if getpwnam() is a system library routine and not a command how would
I go about performing those tests?
please forgive my ignorance ..
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Ilo Lorusso wrote:
> if getpwnam() is a system library routine and not a command how would
> I go about performing those tests?
With a C program, or perhaps a Perl script (if we trust Perl's
getpwnam()). You should also make sure that getent(1) works when
if getpwnam() is a system library routine and not a command how would
I go about performing those tests?
please forgive my ignorance ..
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Postfix uses the standard getpwnam() system library routine to
> determine if a user
Postfix uses the standard getpwnam() system library routine to
determine if a user exists.
You should do your tests with getpwnam(), not with the
getent command.
Wietse
Jeff:
> So
> I tried inserting "Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in the
> headers, but they still bounced to the script user.
As documented, use the "sendmail -f" option.
Return-Path: is created on OUTPUT, it is not used for INPUT.
> Same deal with
> inserting "Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Err
Eddy Beliveau:
> Documentation said:
> /"In the case that multiple *FILTER* actions fire, only the last one is
> executed. "
>
> /I try without success to override previously defined FILTER
> /^some-special-header/ FILTER my-filter
> /^my-filter-been-there: Yes/ FILTER none
As document
Jeff wrote:
I have a shell script that generates simple emails by piping text
(with To, From and Subject headers) to 'sendmail -t' (the postfix
version). All is well with that except when a message bounces. The
failure notice comes back to the user that ran the script. The script
is run from cron
Dear Guys,
I am having a postfix+ldap+jamm debian server having more than 15 mail
accounts and so now, Jamm is not able to load all the mail accounts together
and not able to reset a mail account password due to this. Please let me
know is there any alternative to Jamm, i am not able to see a
Jeff wrote:
> What am I doing wrong? http://www.postfix.org/sendmail.1.html says
> that Errors-To overrides command line options to sendmail, so why is
> it not heeded when no return path command line options are used?
>
Please, reread it again..
-f sender
Set the envelo
I have a shell script that generates simple emails by piping text
(with To, From and Subject headers) to 'sendmail -t' (the postfix
version). All is well with that except when a message bounces. The
failure notice comes back to the user that ran the script. The script
is run from cron under an admi
If it can not be done at
the moment, all right (I found a similar request in 2006 - message
209338).
My real problem is this:
Many customers use mail groups (virtual_alias_maps). Each
destination account can create their own rules for releasing and
blocking, which is consulted by
Hi,
I've got my system using pam_mysql for authentication for horde and
dovecot which is working great.
when I wish to try send a message to one of my local users which
resides in the MySQL database
postfix keeps bouncing the message as user unknown.. logs below..
==
Oct 29 18:26:16 hor
Viktor,
No problem the server is now very speed...
Thank you for all your help.
Best regards.
Francis
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:18:13AM +0100, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
I have just a little question, how can I disable de qmgr logging ?
In a "normal" case I am interre
Hi! Networkers,
I'm using postfix 2.5.4 and it works perfectly. Thanks ;-)
/
/25 -> 10024 -> 10025/
/I add FILTER action within my header_checks file and it works correctly.
My header_checks file contains:
/^some-special-header/ FILTER my-filter
25 -> 10024 -> 10025 -> 10027 -> 10025
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:18:13AM +0100, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> I have just a little question, how can I disable de qmgr logging ?
> In a "normal" case I am interrested in the log by the
> smtpd/smtp/delevery agents activity (mail come from, go to filter, go to
> dest...), but not by the clean
Stefan Förster ha scritto:
Conclusion: Don't put valuable data on ReiserFS. Don't do premature
optimization. You can always change filesystems if your tests show
performance gains and you run into performance shortages.
Cheers
Stefan
Thank you for the answer, I'll take a look to your tests t
Rocco Scappatura:
> Oct 29 10:27:58 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: connect from
> unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]
> Oct 29 10:27:58 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: 7B98D75008D:
> client=unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]
> Oct 29 10:34:25 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: timeout after DATA from
> unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]
> Oct 29 10
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails
through
my
Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client.
Indeed, I get the problem while sending email with attachment with
size
above 5-6 MB..
From mai
> > > I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails
through
> my
> > > Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client.
> >
> > Indeed, I get the problem while sending email with attachment with
> size
> > above 5-6 MB..
> >
> > > From mail log, I saw:
> > >
> > > postfix/smtpd[1
Pete Fuggle:
> So it seems that
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions are somehow being invoked when VRFY is used?
VRFY is pretty useless by now because many sites disable it.
Postfix invokes smtpd_recipient_restrictions to make the reply
similar to that of RCPT TO (no point to have VRFY reply with 2xx
?li?s Tam?s:
> Oct 24 22:09:24 ** postfix/master[27379]: warning: master_wakeup_timer_event:
> service tlsmgr(private/tlsmgr): Resource temporarily unavailable
> Oct 24 22:33:54 *** postfix/qmgr[741]: warning: connect to transport
> maildrop: Resource temporarily unavailable
> Oct 24 22:33:54 ***
Ranjith Kumar пишет:
Hi,
I have enabled sender_bcc_maps on my postfix mta using the
documentation available on postfix site. The mails are being forwarded
successfully, but I am receiving 2 copies of the mail.
What could be the problem?
Please, show main.cf and master.cf, specifically
recie
Udv / Greetings!
Attachment dod not go through. I post my master.cf here:
# ==
# service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args
# (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100)
# ===
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this is a bit OT, but I just don't seem be be able to find a satisfying
solution for my problem:
Up to now we have been maintaining the relocated_maps as an ordinary
hash table, while all the "other" things like domains, users, aliases
etc. are
* Ranjith Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I am not using amavisd-new. I am using spamassassin as the content filter.
Please show master.cf then.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
htt
Udv / Greetings!
I have a classic virtual mail hosting setup, with postfix 2.5,
dovecot, maildrop, ldap and sasl authentication. I've just setup
quotas and upgraded he server from posfix 2.3. All is is working fine,
but. I'm starting to receive the following messages:
Oct 24 22:09:24 ** postfix/m
Rocco Scappatura:
> > I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails through my
> > Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client.
>
> Indeed, I get the problem while sending email with attachment with size
> above 5-6 MB..
>
> > From mail log, I saw:
> >
> > postfix/smtpd[16
Zitat von "MacShane, Tracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vince LaMonica
Sent: Tuesday, 28 October 2008 4:11 AM
To: Patrick Ben Koetter
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: problems authenticating
[snip]
TIA
* Simone Felici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
> have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
> also I would ask you...
> Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
> I'm going to migrate a mai
> I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails through my
> Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client.
Indeed, I get the problem while sending email with attachment with size
above 5-6 MB..
> From mail log, I saw:
>
> postfix/smtpd[16988]: connect from unknown[xxx.yyy.w
Hi,
I am not using amavisd-new. I am using spamassassin as the content filter.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Ranjith Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I have enabled sender_bcc_maps on my postfix mta using the
>> documentation available on postfix
Hi Viktor,
Normaly at this time I have lot of mail in the incoming, but with
your modification nothing... the response of the server, and the mail
process are perfect THANK YOU !
I have just a little question, how can I disable de qmgr logging ?
In a "normal" case I am interrested in the l
> > I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
> > have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
> > also I would ask you...
> > Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
> > I'm going to migrate a mailserver with EXT3 (and qmail) t
Hello,
I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails through my
Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client.
>From mail log, I saw:
postfix/smtpd[16988]: connect from unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]
postfix/smtpd[16988]: 7B98D75008D: client=unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]
postfix/cleanu
* Ranjith Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have enabled sender_bcc_maps on my postfix mta using the
> documentation available on postfix site. The mails are being forwarded
> successfully, but I am receiving 2 copies of the mail.
>
> What could be the problem?
You didn't read the installation inst
* Simone Felici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Postfix-Users!
>
> I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
> have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
> also I would ask you...
> Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
> I'm goin
Hi,
I have enabled sender_bcc_maps on my postfix mta using the
documentation available on postfix site. The mails are being forwarded
successfully, but I am receiving 2 copies of the mail.
What could be the problem?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Barney Desmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi Postfix-Users!
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but have found only old results, maybe the
meanwhile something is different, also I would ask you...
Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
I'm going to migrate a mailserver with EXT3 (and qmail) t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vince LaMonica
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 October 2008 4:11 AM
> To: Patrick Ben Koetter
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: problems authenticating
>
> [snip]
>
> TIA once again,
>
> /vjl/
>
C
54 matches
Mail list logo