Wietse Venema wrote:
Zhang Huangbin:
Hi, all.
Normally, i use 'domain.ltd/username/Maildir' as users' maildir path, if
i change them to hash style, e.g. 'A0/B0/domain.ltd/C0/D0/username/Maildir',
will it speed up the index operation for MDA? If we have 1 users,
which maildir path style w
On Sat, December 13, 2008 18:50, mouss wrote:
> Last time you showed it, you did not have zen in your config.
blocking forged senders is diff then use a rbl check
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Sat, December 13, 2008 16:08, Roland Plüss wrote:
> The problem is that it doesn't seem to work neither the way
> mentioned in the threads nor adding the dns bypass...
> I've got again 20 of those same spam shit in my inbox today.
> It's going on my nerves. Is there no way to stop this?
http:/
Roland Plüss a écrit :
>> There is no "dns bypass". I did not tell you to edit /etc/hosts. I told
>> you to run the following command:
>>
>> host 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
>>
>> in short, connect to your postfix server and in the terminal, type the
>> line above, hit "ENTER" and see what the syste
Chris Turan a écrit :
> Hey All,
>
> Thanks to all for the suggestions so far. I've enabled RBL looks on my
> MX gateways using the the tips so far. I have to report an overwhelming
> success. Nearly all of my spam is blocked in the SMTP transaction. Very
> few spams make it past smtp and spama
Chris Turan wrote:
> Thanks to all for the suggestions so far. I've enabled RBL looks on my
> MX gateways using the the tips so far. I have to report an overwhelming
> success. Nearly all of my spam is blocked in the SMTP transaction. Very
> few spams make it past smtp and spamassassin cle
Roland Plüss wrote:
I know what host or nslookup is. I'm not stupid on that front. It gives
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.4
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.10
It's just that you said they monitor the number of "dns
Roland Plüss schrieb:
It's just that you said they monitor the number of "dns queries". Now by
bypassing a query for the DNS I can put it locally on my machine so no
queries for the DNS goes out to the net. Whatever I removed the line
from /etc/hosts for testing but it still doesn't seem to work.
Hey All,
Thanks to all for the suggestions so far. I've enabled RBL looks on my
MX gateways using the the tips so far. I have to report an overwhelming
success. Nearly all of my spam is blocked in the SMTP transaction.
Very few spams make it past smtp and spamassassin cleans up the rest.
Victor Duchovni escribió:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 05:14:26AM +0100, klondike wrote:
>
>
>> When I first wrote began this thread I did it thinking that knowing this
>> issue, could be helpful.
>>
>
> If your first post contains the word "bug" in the subject line, expect
> to meet resistanc
Zhang Huangbin:
> Hi, all.
>
> Normally, i use 'domain.ltd/username/Maildir' as users' maildir path, if
> i change them to hash style, e.g. 'A0/B0/domain.ltd/C0/D0/username/Maildir',
> will it speed up the index operation for MDA? If we have 1 users,
> which maildir path style will improve per
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
> Normally, i use 'domain.ltd/username/Maildir' as users' maildir path, if
> i change them to hash style, e.g. 'A0/B0/domain.ltd/C0/D0/username/Maildir',
> will it speed up the index operation for MDA? If we have 1 users,
> which maildir path style will improve performanc
Roland Pl?ss wrote:
> It's just that you said they monitor the number of "dns queries". Now by
> bypassing a query for the DNS I can put it locally on my machine so no
> queries for the DNS goes out to the net.
If you inhibit DNS queries from going to the spamhaus server, you
defeat the purpose
Hi, all.
Normally, i use 'domain.ltd/username/Maildir' as users' maildir path, if
i change them to hash style, e.g. 'A0/B0/domain.ltd/C0/D0/username/Maildir',
will it speed up the index operation for MDA? If we have 1 users,
which maildir path style will improve performance?
Thanks very much
Admin a écrit :
> OK, I know I did something wrong here. I downloaded, compiled and
> installed (I Thought) Postfix, and I THOUGHT it became my default MTA
> but evidently not.
>
redhat systems have the "alternatives" program:
# alternatives --set mta /path/to/postfix-sendmail
> I am running
> There is no "dns bypass". I did not tell you to edit /etc/hosts. I told
> you to run the following command:
>
> host 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org
>
> in short, connect to your postfix server and in the terminal, type the
> line above, hit "ENTER" and see what the system tells you. "host" is
> simi
OK, I know I did something wrong here. I downloaded, compiled and installed
(I Thought) Postfix, and I THOUGHT it became my default MTA but evidently
not.
I am running Centos 4.7 with cPanel., and I know this can be done, since I
used to run a dedi that had that setup.
If any one would be so
Ervin Hegedüs a écrit :
> Hello List,
>
> I try to use ${original_recipients} in master.cf for an external
> commands arguments as service.
>
> The Postfix pipe manual describes it:
>
> ${original_recipient}
> This macro expands to the complete recipient
> address before any addre
Hello List,
I try to use ${original_recipients} in master.cf for an external
commands arguments as service.
The Postfix pipe manual describes it:
${original_recipient}
This macro expands to the complete recipient
address before any address rewriting or
aliasing.
Example:
* Payne :
> I am a bit slow on this, I got a client that won't let me change the way
> mail working, but they want me to set up SMTP Authentication. How can I
They want your mailserver to send SMTP Authentication data to their server?
> do it so it work without cyrus or dovecot. I question wh
20 matches
Mail list logo
