I guess this has been discussed a time or two already, but, as of yet,
I haven't found anyone that has found a real solution. We need the
ability to have around 1000 domains per physical server, while
allowing each domain to maintain their own sender blacklist (using the
sender's email address, no
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:41:35PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>> This causes problems with e.g. GMX, which then bounces the mail, since
>> they consider "+foo" to be part of the username (and that does not exist).
>
> Then GMX is broken or misconfigured or just doesn't want to accept
> delimited user
I got this in log, message to postfix mailing list can not be sent
after I changed
relayhost = $mydomain
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:17:59PM -0500, Zhengquan Zhang wrote:
Apr 8 20:17:59 m364d1 postfix/cleanup[2364]: D9AC0B5B57:
message-id=<20090409011759.ga2...@m364d1.ece.northwestern.edu>
439
Dear postfix community,
I use postfix personally on my computer to send emails, also two mail
servers I am in charge of are running postfix.
Now I have a basic question about my personal computer postfix
configuration that I don't have a answer for:
I followed an fellow expert's suggestion and I
On 4/8/2009, Patrick Ben Koetter (p...@state-of-mind.de) wrote:
>>> I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
>> The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
>> support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a
>> lot of hacking...
> This will change in Mail
* Charles Marcus :
> On 4/8/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
> > I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
>
> The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
> support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a lot
> of hacking...
This will change in Ma
On 4/8/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
> I'd say go for the popular one: mailman.
The only thing I *don't* like about mailman is it doesn't natively
support virtual domains. It can be made to work, but it requires a lot
of hacking...
Other than that, its great...
--
Best regards,
Ch
Jorey Bump a écrit :
> berny wrote, at 04/08/2009 05:41 AM:
>
>> 2. If yes, what type do you use?
>>a) only PTR check [reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname]
>>b) or PTR=A check [reject_unknown_client_hostname]
>> 3. What are your experiencies and opinion to it?
>
> I have found
LuKreme a écrit :
>
> All the help I've found on this has people adding a plaintext password
> to the mysql database. This just feels wrong, immoral, sticky, icky,
> and fill in any other words you like here from your favorite Thesaurus.
>
don't be too fanatic. storing passwords in the clear is
Guy a écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
> having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
> Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
> postfix/maildrop
postfix is MLM agnostic.
> or one that people find particularly nice
On 8-Apr-2009, at 14:39, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:34:48PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:55, Victor Duchovni wrote:
he best way to bootstrap SASL is to first get it working with the
sample
server and client outside the MTA. Once you have a working SASL
s
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:34:48PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:55, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>>> he best way to bootstrap SASL is to first get it working with the sample
>>> server and client outside the MTA. Once you have a working SASL system,
>>> int
LuKreme a écrit :
> On 7-Apr-2009, at 18:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> You may be running into Berkeley DB cache consistency issues, using
>> SQL is probably a better idea. Does pbs support SQL?
>
> I don't think so.
>
>> In any case, PBS is a hack, use SASL.
>
> Yeah, I've been trying to get SA
On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:59, Daniel Hahler wrote:
when user+...@example.com gets forwarded to an external address
through
virtual_alias_maps, the local part "+foo" is being kept.
+foo is not 'the local part', 'user+foo' is the local user, and + is a
recipient delimiter. If you are passing the e
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:34:48PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:55, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> he best way to bootstrap SASL is to first get it working with the sample
>> server and client outside the MTA. Once you have a working SASL system,
>> integrate that with Postfix. Don't do
On 8-Apr-2009, at 11:55, Victor Duchovni wrote:
he best way to bootstrap SASL is to first get it working with the
sample
server and client outside the MTA. Once you have a working SASL
system,
integrate that with Postfix. Don't do everything at the same time.
MySQL can be a tricky back-end f
On 8-Apr-2009, at 10:19, Jonathan Selander wrote:
I find it hard to believe that there isn't a script out there that
does something as simple as this without being dependant on big
weird setups
Considering how much real hatred there is for vacation scripts and how
often they are abused thi
Guy wrote:
Hi guys,
The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
postfix/maildrop or one that people find particularly nice to use?
Thanks
Guy
I found mailman was
Brian/Magnus...
I'm new to Postfix (a recent Sendmail convert), so I am assuming that I'm
missing some fundamental piece of information to get this to work as I
expect.
Fix your vmailbox map.
I knew I could do that and that it would work, but I misunderstood
(overlooked is more like it) tha
Gary Chambers wrote:
> All...
>
> The problem is that mail is delivered to
> $virtual_mailbox_base/domain1.com/home/test/
> (/vhome/domain1.com/home/test/)
> as opposed to $virtual_mailbox_base/domain1.com/home/test/$home_mailbox/
> (/vhome/domain1.com/home/test/Maildir/). Local delivery is unaffe
On Wednesday, April 08, 2009 at 19:20 CEST,
Gary Chambers wrote:
> I'm using Postfix 2.5.6 with Dovecot 1.1.11 on Solaris 10 x86.
> I'm having trouble getting Postfix to deliver virtual domain
> Maildir-format mail to $home_mailbox. It only delivers it to
> the virtual user's home. A rathe
Greetings,
I agree that if they have to ask, it's probably the wrong way, but it's not
my call. Unless they break protocol, I can not object, and have to make sure
things run as expected.
Thanks for the link.
Cheers,
Walt
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Victor Duchovni <
victor.ducho...@morgan
Hi,
when user+...@example.com gets forwarded to an external address through
virtual_alias_maps, the local part "+foo" is being kept.
This causes problems with e.g. GMX, which then bounces the mail, since
they consider "+foo" to be part of the username (and that does not exist).
Now I'm wondering
Wietse...
Postfix logs all delivery attempts. The name of the file is usually in
/etc/syslog.conf.
I apologize for not mentioning it in my original e-mail. There's nothing
relevant in (in my case) /var/log/syslog. Postfix simply states,
"(delivered to maildir)," which is correct. It just do
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:32:19AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 7-Apr-2009, at 18:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> You may be running into Berkeley DB cache consistency issues, using
>> SQL is probably a better idea. Does pbs support SQL?
>
> I don't think so.
That's too bad because concurrent R/O rea
Postfix logs all delivery attempts. The name of the file is usually
in /etc/syslog.conf.
Wietse
All...
I'm using Postfix 2.5.6 with Dovecot 1.1.11 on Solaris 10 x86. I'm having
trouble getting Postfix to deliver virtual domain Maildir-format mail to
$home_mailbox. It only delivers it to the virtual user's home. A rather
exhaustive Google search returned some hits on the problem, but none
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:32:24AM -0500, Walt Park wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have some develpers that want to do.. strange things with the to, from,
> and/or reply_to fields for routing. They are concerned that there may be a
> limit to the string length they can use either before or after the @
Walt Park:
> Greetings,
>
> I have some develpers that want to do.. strange things with the to, from,
> and/or reply_to fields for routing. They are concerned that there may be a
> limit to the string length they can use either before or after the @ in the
> address in the to: from:, and reply_to:
Greetings,
I have some develpers that want to do.. strange things with the to, from,
and/or reply_to fields for routing. They are concerned that there may be a
limit to the string length they can use either before or after the @ in the
address in the to: from:, and reply_to: .
I know that's proba
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:15:24AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Jorey Bump wrote, at 04/08/2009 09:09 AM:
>
> > At the extreme end, some major
> > registrars cannot pass these checks, which could put domains at risk for
> > recipients who depend on email reminders to renew their domain
> > registra
Would you happen to have an example on a vacation script that works
with virtual users, or do i need to create one to suit my needs?
I find it hard to believe that there isn't a script out there that
does something as simple as this without being dependant on big weird
setups
8 apr 2009
Noel Jones:
> Artem Bokhan wrote:
> > Noel Jones ?:
> >> Artem Bokhan wrote:
> >>> How can I insert newline with header checks?
> >>>
> >>> smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
> >>
> >> You can't. The REPLACE action does not support multi-line headers.
> >>
> >> -- Noel Jones
> > I
Jorey Bump wrote, at 04/08/2009 09:09 AM:
> At the extreme end, some major
> registrars cannot pass these checks, which could put domains at risk for
> recipients who depend on email reminders to renew their domain
> registrations.
I guess we can add PayPal to the list of major players with poorl
Artem Bokhan wrote:
Noel Jones пишет:
Artem Bokhan wrote:
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
You can't. The REPLACE action does not support multi-line headers.
-- Noel Jones
It does if input header is multi-line... but catching newl
Noel Jones пишет:
Artem Bokhan wrote:
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
You can't. The REPLACE action does not support multi-line headers.
-- Noel Jones
It does if input header is multi-line... but catching newline char from
input
Henrik K wrote, at 04/08/2009 09:54 AM:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:09:58AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> It's a shame, because enforcing these checks would have a noticeable
>> impact on spam, especially FCrDNS:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_Confirmed_reverse_DNS
>>
>> Sadly, I have
Jonathan Selander wrote:
I tried a few variants and it seems multiple transports isn't possible (?)
Is there another way to accomplish something similar? I know i can use
two domains, but i don't want to configure this manually for every
domain i create
For multiple deliveries, you must ha
Artem Bokhan wrote:
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
You can't. The REPLACE action does not support multi-line
headers.
-- Noel Jones
How can I insert newline with header checks?
smth like /(.*)example(.*)/ REPLACE $1\n $2
I tried a few variants and it seems multiple transports isn't possible
(?)
Is there another way to accomplish something similar? I know i can use
two domains, but i don't want to configure this manually for every
domain i create
8 apr 2009 kl. 13.20 skrev Jonathan Selander:
Hi,
I'm tr
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:09:58AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
>
> It's a shame, because enforcing these checks would have a noticeable
> impact on spam, especially FCrDNS:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_Confirmed_reverse_DNS
>
> Sadly, I have been unable to uncover a method to use FCrD
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
> On my postfix mail server I have RBL definitions at
> smtpd_client_restrictions phase. At the moment 2 of 4 rbl's waiting until
> tcp timeout without an answer when I try with nslookup.
It sounds like your dns recursor is having problems. Ens
Danilo Paffi Monteiro:
> I think that the question is about the total connection lifetime.
>
> Is there any way to limit the connection lifetime?
No. This would prevent delivery of large messages over slow connections.
However, Postfix 2.5 has an option to change SMTP server timeouts
when all se
berny wrote, at 04/08/2009 05:41 AM:
> 2. If yes, what type do you use?
>a) only PTR check [reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname]
>b) or PTR=A check [reject_unknown_client_hostname]
> 3. What are your experiencies and opinion to it?
I have found it unsafe to use either. At the
I think that the question is about the total connection lifetime.
Is there any way to limit the connection lifetime?
Imagine one random connection source with very slow interaction with
postfix (example: writing letter by letter in the socket), with this
(example a virus) you can use all connecti
Hi,
I'm trying to set up an autoreply system for my virtual users, and
right now I'm at the problem where i want the mail to be sent to both
virtual: and my autoreply:, so my question is, is it possible to have
both transports for one recipient?
What i want to accomplish is deliver the e-
On Wed, April 8, 2009 05:04, wen.yongzheng wrote:
> I can set catchall mailbox in virtual_mailbox_map like this:
> @domain.name domain.name/catchall/
>
> But I really do not want to check or read the catchall mails, The
> only thing I want to do is to remove all mails in catchall maildir.
> I wond
Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix logging is not yet documented - it is one of those ancient
pieces of version "zero" code that was meant to be replaced by real
code that is properly configurable.
If it's not broken, don't fix it. :)
Working with qmail all day, I really appreciate the postfix log
On Wed, April 8, 2009 12:14 pm, jittinan suwanrueangsri said:
> I want to know message size of an email which was send through postfix.A
> part of raw log is shown as below
>
> Apr 8 14:22:02 MailSecure03 postfix/smtpd[32388]: BA1CE38965: client=
> mail.example.com[x.x.x.x]
> Apr 8 14:22:03 Mail
Hi All
I want to know message size of an email which was send through postfix.A
part of raw log is shown as below
Apr 8 14:22:02 MailSecure03 postfix/smtpd[32388]: BA1CE38965: client=
mail.example.com[x.x.x.x]
Apr 8 14:22:03 MailSecure03 postfix/cleanup[32070]: BA1CE38965:
message-id=<49dc4d9a.
hallo,
I have general quiestion about use of DNS checks.
I mean now checks of client IP. It's about PTR records, A records and maybe
A=PTR checks.
Q:
1. Do you use it?
2. If yes, what type do you use?
a) only PTR check [reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname]
b) or PTR=A check [r
On 7-Apr-2009, at 18:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You may be running into Berkeley DB cache consistency issues, using
SQL is probably a better idea. Does pbs support SQL?
I don't think so.
In any case, PBS is a hack, use SASL.
Yeah, I've been trying to get SASL working for quite a long time.
Hi guys,
The boss has expressed the want for mailing lists now. I've been
having a look at ecartis and mailman for this.
Is there a mailing list manager that's preferred for use with
postfix/maildrop or one that people find particularly nice to use?
Thanks
Guy
--
Don't just do something...sit t
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
> Hi @ll,
> i have a relay for exchange
> which is configured with reject_sender_login_mismatch
> with accounts allowed to send out for configured domains
> at last a infected host generated a faked sender
> which was rejected with not owned by user
> unfourtunally the bo
Barney Desmond 写道:
2009/4/8 wen.yongzheng :
I can set catchall mailbox in virtual_mailbox_map like this:
@domain.name domain.name/catchall/
But I really do not want to check or read the catchall mails, The only
thing I want to do is to remove all mails in catchall maildir. I wonder
if I can
56 matches
Mail list logo
