On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Juha Pahkala wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Juha Pahkala:
>>
>>> Wietse Venema wrote:
>>>
Juha Pahkala:
> Apr 24 15:42:30 server postfix/smtpd[8126]: name_mask: noanonymous
> Apr 24 15:42:30 server postfix/smtpd[8126]:
> xsasl_dovecot_
One of the Cloud9 majordomo servers (english-breakfast) is broken
and drops postings on the floor. It will hopefully be fixed today.
Wietse
>>> freebsd 7.1 and 7.0
>>>
>>> postfix mail_version = 2.4.10
>>>
>>> When traffic triggers postfix to log:
>>>
>>> postfix/smtpd[4]: warning: problem talking to server 127.0.0.1:10041:
>>> Operation timed out
>>>
>>> ... I see that the process qty of policy-to-postfix pegs at 201.
>>>
Len Conrad:
>
> >>> freebsd 7.1 and 7.0
> >>>
> >>> postfix mail_version = 2.4.10
> >>>
> >>> When traffic triggers postfix to log:
> >>>
> >>> postfix/smtpd[4]: warning: problem talking to server 127.0.0.1:10041:
> >>> Operation timed out
> >>>
> >>> ... I see that the process qty of pol
Hi list
Im with the next problem: I have and old server and Im in process to migrate
to a better machine, but actually Im having spam attacks in the server than
saturate it. For the age of the server and because in two weeks is replaced
I can't install any program like spamity or similar to help
Wietse Venema:
> One of the Cloud9 majordomo servers (english-breakfast) is broken
> and drops postings on the floor. It will hopefully be fixed today.
It should be fixed now.
Wietse
> Hi list
>
> Im with the next problem: I have and old server and Im in process to migrate
to a better machine, but actually Im having spam attacks in the server than
saturate it. For the age of the server and because in two weeks is replaced
I can't install any program like spamity or similar t
deconya:
> Hi list
>
> Im with the next problem: I have and old server and Im in process to migrate
> to a better machine, but actually Im having spam attacks in the server than
> saturate it. For the age of the server and because in two weeks is replaced
> I can't install any program like spamit
I'm not sure if you can on your hardware, but some of my most
effective countermeasures are ehlo/helo checking for hostname does not
contain a ".". This can cause a very small amount of false positives
so please do check your logs first.
Second is greylisting.
Third is checking if the ehlo
= enhanced status code (e.g., "5.7.1"),
{rcpt_addr} = reason to reject (e.g., "Relay access denied").
This will be available in release candidate postfix-2.6.0-RC2
and in experimental release postfix-2.7-20090426.
Wietse
Hi people.
Great Great... What happens ?
2009/4/27 Wietse Venema :
> Wietse Venema:
>> One of the Cloud9 majordomo servers (english-breakfast) is broken
>> and drops postings on the floor. It will hopefully be fixed today.
>
> It should be fixed now.
>
> Wietse
>
--
--
It must be said, especially since it is not done so enough:
Thank you Wetse Venema for postfix,
but also how you seem to tirelessly help the community in their
many questions. You did not write it and just send it off, but
have continued to support it.
The email community owes you a great deal
On Apr 24, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Juha Pahkala wrote:
Apr 24 15:42:50 server postfix/smtpd[8126]: fatal: no SASL
authentication mechanisms
..
auth default:
mechanisms: plain login
So Dovecot is advertising PLAIN and LOGIN mechanisms to Postfix.
client:
path: /var/spool/postfix/private/a
On Apr 26, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
smtpd_sasl_path = private/dovecot
..
I can see the private/auth socket created when dovecot starts, with
postfix:postfix permissions. Also, netstat shows it:
bash:# netstat -ln | grep dovecot
unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:04:50AM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Oh. That's actually it. Dovecot is listening on private/auth, but Postfix
> is connecting to private/dovecot. But what is listening on private/dovecot
> then? You've added some kind of a "dovecot" service to master.cf?
Almost cert
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 00:08 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:04:50AM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > Oh. That's actually it. Dovecot is listening on private/auth, but Postfix
> > is connecting to private/dovecot. But what is listening on private/dovecot
> > then? You'
16 matches
Mail list logo