Wietse Venema wrote:
> Seth Mattinen:
>> Multiline responses in SMTP are (as far as I know) not allowed. I'm sure
>> Wietse will correct me it I'm wrong, but I can't ever recall it.
>
> They are allowed. In fact, most EHLO server responses are multi-line.
>
Ah yes, silly me. I've seen multiline
some more logs I would like to give as I am struck up here and need help.
The permission of some of the directories are
# ls -l /
drwxr-xr-x 2 girish root 0 Jan 1 1970 bin
drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 debug
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 3660 Jun 11 21:36 dev
drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 0 Sep 12 16:5
* LuKreme :
> I am planning on recompiling postfix and all its various helper apps
> (switching from cyrus to dovecot, upgrading mysql, Maybe setting up
> LDAP, and doing a clean install of FreeBSD latest) onto a newer, and
> hopefully more capable machine.
>
> What I want to do is get the new sy
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> >Depending on how many users you have to move, just select a bunch and
> >spool mail for them on the current Postfix box while you rsync their
> >IMAP mailboxes to the new box.
>
> Probably not enough users to make that necessary, but that might be a
> way to
On 13-Sep-2009, at 18:27, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
My question is what is the best way to actually migrate the mail and
the users to the new machine without losing mail? WOuld it be a good
idea (or even possible) to run the two machines in parallel for a
time, havi
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, James Hankins wrote:
> If you could please point me to blacklists that are using Sender
> Verification as qualification for being on it, I'd be interested in
> seeing this.
[snip off-topic noise]
See: http://www.backscatterer.org/?target=sendercallouts. Please take
all fo
If you could please point me to blacklists that are using Sender
Verification as qualification for being on it, I'd be interested in
seeing this. This feature has been around for some 10 years as a
means for helping to thwart spam. It would seem to me this is a win
for the spammers if the
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 9/13/2009 7:14 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
> >
> >>On 9/13/2009 10:45 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >>>On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, mouss wrote:
>
> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
> ...
> check_client_access ha
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> I am planning on recompiling postfix and all its various helper apps
> (switching from cyrus to dovecot, upgrading mysql, Maybe setting up
> LDAP, and doing a clean install of FreeBSD latest) onto a newer, and
> hopefully more capable machine.
>
> What I wan
On 9/13/2009 7:14 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/13/2009 10:45 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, mouss wrote:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
...
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/forged_sender_wl
check_sender_access has
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 9/13/2009 10:45 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, mouss wrote:
> >>
> >>smtpd_sender_restrictions =
> >>...
> >>check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/forged_sender_wl
> >>check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/forged_sender_bl
>
sean darcy:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > sean darcy:
> >> Sep 13 16:00:19 asterisk postfix/smtp[1786]: warning: TLS library
> >> problem: 1786:error:0B080074:x509 certificate
> >> routines:X509_check_private_key:key values mismatch:x509_cmp.c:304:
> >
> > Does the client private key match the clie
Wietse Venema wrote:
sean darcy:
Sep 13 16:00:19 asterisk postfix/smtp[1786]: warning: TLS library
problem: 1786:error:0B080074:x509 certificate
routines:X509_check_private_key:key values mismatch:x509_cmp.c:304:
Does the client private key match the client (public key) certificate?
See the
I am planning on recompiling postfix and all its various helper apps
(switching from cyrus to dovecot, upgrading mysql, Maybe setting up
LDAP, and doing a clean install of FreeBSD latest) onto a newer, and
hopefully more capable machine.
What I want to do is get the new system built and co
sean darcy:
> Sep 13 16:00:19 asterisk postfix/smtp[1786]: warning: TLS library
> problem: 1786:error:0B080074:x509 certificate
> routines:X509_check_private_key:key values mismatch:x509_cmp.c:304:
Does the client private key match the client (public key) certificate?
See the Postfix TLS_README
On 9/13/2009 10:45 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, mouss wrote:
What I mean by this is, if a malicious attacker send an email from
dam...@hotmail.com is there anyway to check that the email came from
hotmail.com via a DNS lookup?
the simplest thing you can do is something like th
Postfix-2.6.5 0n Fedora 12:
I'm trying use gmail as a relay for my mail. But I keep getting this
error when I try to send mail:
Sep 13 16:00:19 asterisk postfix/smtp[1786]: warning: cannot get RSA
private key from file /etc/postfix/postfixclient.key: disabling TLS support
Sep 13 16:00:19 aste
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 23:51 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Your LDAP aliases table is expected to be equivalent in its use of
> keys and values to the on-disk file. This is a frequently answered
> question.
Thank you. I solved this by moving the LDAP lookup to a virtual table
rather than a pure
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, mouss wrote:
> > What I mean by this is, if a malicious attacker send an email from
> > dam...@hotmail.com is there anyway to check that the email came from
> > hotmail.com via a DNS lookup?
>
> the simplest thing you can do is something like this:
>
> smtpd_sender_restricti
I set 40 seconds for policy time limit and too for
smtpd_policy_service_max_ttl I telneted the smtpd later after
data
command I waited 2 minutes (for exceeding nice the 40 seconds) for
Perhaps surprisingly, Postfix starts a new policy daemon when a
policy daemon process terminates too s
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
> >>
> >> When you run the policy service under the Postfix spawn daemon,
> >> terminate when a read operation returns an end-of-file indication.
> >>
> >>Wietse
> >
> > Hi Wietse,
> >
> > Have just read this... yep this is just what I do, I read from input
> > fd w
When you run the policy service under the Postfix spawn daemon,
terminate when a read operation returns an end-of-file indication.
Wietse
Hi Wietse,
Have just read this... yep this is just what I do, I read from input
fd with <> wich in perl does the trick. I didn't remember I exite
Damian Myerscough a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> I thought there was a way in Postfix to perform DNS lookups on the
> senders domain.
>
> For example, if I send a forged mail from my machine to say my gmail
> address then
> if I look at the full headers I can see the actual IP address it was
> sent f
and how could I know that the smtp server has disconnected from the
policy server? what does postfix send for knowing it?
When you run the policy service under the Postfix spawn daemon,
terminate when a read operation returns an end-of-file indication.
Wietse
Hi Wietse,
Have just
Damian Myerscough:
> Hello all,
>
> I thought there was a way in Postfix to perform DNS lookups on the
> senders domain.
Perhaps you meant: http://www.google.com/search?q=postfix+spf
This creates problems when mail is forwarded so that it
comes from a different IP address.
Wietse
Hello all,
I thought there was a way in Postfix to perform DNS lookups on the
senders domain.
For example, if I send a forged mail from my machine to say my gmail
address then
if I look at the full headers I can see the actual IP address it was
sent from and it does
not resolve the the forged add
James Hankins a écrit :
> One way, albiet expensive on CPU util is reject_unverified_sender.
What are the chances that dam...@largedomain does not exist?
and what if this is used as a "spam trap" by hotmail?
> [snip]
>
Damian Myerscough a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I had a question regarding forged mail. I wanted to know if it was
> possible for Postfix for
> postfix to check the integrity of incoming emails?
>
> What I mean by this is, if a malicious attacker send an email from
> dam...@hotmail.com is
> there anyway
Sahil,
Thank you so much. It seems to be working after I removed the $. Once
again, thanks for your time and patience.
Charles
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, c cc wrote:
>
>> mydestination = $myhostname, localhost, $mydomain,
>> localhost.$mydomain,
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, c cc wrote:
> mydestination = $myhostname, localhost, $mydomain,
> localhost.$mydomain, $ns1.example.org, localhost.localdomain,
> localhost.$ns1.example.org
> mydomain = example.org
> myhostname = ns1.example.org
> myorigin = $ns1.example.org
What's with all these '$ns1' ref
Sahil,
Thanks--here are the files.
Chralres
/var/log $postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
html_directory = no
inet_interfaces = all
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, c cc wrote:
> Thank you. Here is the main part of the aliase file.
Also show us the output of 'postconf -n' and some un-modified sections from
your maillog that display the ENTIRE error.
--
Sahil Tandon
Sahil,
Thank you. Here is the main part of the aliase file.
Charles
# Aliases in this file will NOT be expanded in the header from
# Mail, but WILL be visible over networks or from /bin/mail.
#
# >> The program "newaliases" must be run after
# >> NOTE >> this file
33 matches
Mail list logo
