Re: Postfix LDAP Temporary lookup failure

2010-03-28 Thread Stefan Foerster
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org: Currently, sites that send valid UTF-8 in MAIL/RCPT commands can make meaningful LDAP queries in Postfix. Lots of MTAs are 8-bit clean internally, so this can actually work today. Do we want to remove this ability from Postfix, or should we add a

Re: Postfix LDAP Temporary lookup failure

2010-03-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Stefan Foerster: As of today, is u...@sch?n.example.com the same user as u...@xn--schn-7qa.example.com, as far as e.g. access(5) maps are concerned? No, they are, and have always been, different. If xn--schn-7qa.example.com is what Postfix receives, then xn--schn-7qa.example.com is what

Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Frank Reid
Scenario: I would like to deliver all mail for the @example.com domain to a single mailbox as a single delivery (to preserve header information). I have set up: -- main.cf virtual_alias_domains = example.com virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual -- virtual @example.com

Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Frank Reid: Scenario: I would like to deliver all mail for the @example.com domain to a single mailbox as a single delivery (to preserve header information). I have set up: -- main.cf virtual_alias_domains = example.com virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual -- virtual

RE: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Frank Reid
Wietse Venema wrote: Yes it is possible. However, I need to warn you first about a mis-conception. The To: header is NOT a reliable indicator of the intended recipient. Understand. I have no intention to sort out or deliver this mail by other means from the destination mailbox. It's for

Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Frank Reid: Wietse Venema wrote: Yes it is possible. However, I need to warn you first about a mis-conception. The To: header is NOT a reliable indicator of the intended recipient. Understand. I have no intention to sort out or deliver this mail by other means from the

RE: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Frank Reid
Wietse Venema wrote: To prove that POSTFIX is at fault you need to demonstrate that ONE message with MULTIPLE recipients results in MULTIPLE deliveries. I did some tests, and it appears it only happens when addressing the virtual domain. POSTFIX does only one RCPT TO for normal (local or

Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Frank Reid: Wietse Venema wrote: To prove that POSTFIX is at fault you need to demonstrate that ONE message with MULTIPLE recipients results in MULTIPLE deliveries. I did some tests, and it appears it only happens when addressing the virtual domain. POSTFIX does only one RCPT TO for

Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Frank Reid: Wietse Venema wrote: To prove that POSTFIX is at fault you need to demonstrate that ONE message with MULTIPLE recipients results in MULTIPLE deliveries. I did some tests, and it appears it only happens when addressing the virtual domain. POSTFIX does only one RCPT TO for

Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Daniel L'Hommedieu
On Mar 28, 2010, at 15:23, Wietse Venema wrote: BTW, Postfix 2.3 is no longer maintained. It is almost four years old. Wietse, After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix I have installed. The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.

Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote: On Mar 28, 2010, at 15:23, Wietse Venema wrote: BTW, Postfix 2.3 is no longer maintained. It is almost four years old. Wietse, After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix I have installed. The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is

Fwd: Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread fakessh
Original Message Subject: Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:14:43 +0200 From: fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu To: Roderick A. Anderson raand...@cyber-office.net On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:00:08 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson raand...@cyber-office.net

Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:51:27 -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu dlhommed...@gmail.com articulated: After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix I have installed. The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2. It's interesting that both of these Linux

Re: Consolidating Virtual Domain Delivery

2010-03-28 Thread Daniel L'Hommedieu
On Mar 28, 2010, at 19:28, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:51:27 -0400, Daniel L'Hommedieu dlhommed...@gmail.com articulated: After seeing this comment, I decided to see what versions of postfix I have installed. The RPM available for both CentOS 5 and RHEL5 is postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.