On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:22:08PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>
> It looks as if moving my RBLs to postscreen means they're no longer
> needed in my *_restrictions - is there a scenario where this would
> not be the case ?
If you want to whitelist by other means than IP.
> anyway, look at your master.cf. you may have overriden your smtpd
> restrictions there...
Good thinking, from my little understanding the master.cf is ok
# grep -v '^ *\(#.*\)\?$' /etc/postfix/master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -v - v
pickupfifo n
Rich Wales:
> Now, here's my problem. I want to be able to do special handling of
> mail to a subdomain (sandals.richw.org). Mail for this subdomain
> should be relayed via its own server (sandals.richw.org, as shown in
> my "transport" file) -- and this alternate relay host should *not*
> requir
> If sandals.richw.org should not require SASL authentication, then
> you should not turn on SASL authentication on sandals.richw.org.
Ah. Indeed, I had inadvertently enabled SASL authentication in the
Sandals SMTP server (smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes in that server's
Postfix configuration). Thi
On 05/31/2010 08:15 AM, Jarrod Neven wrote:
The non verbose version:
ay 31 22:03:50 DKPADMMAIL1 postfix/postfix-script[3329]: starting the
Postfix mail system
May 31 22:03:50 DKPADMMAIL1 postfix/master[3330]: daemon started -- version
2.5.1, configuration /etc/postfix
May 31 22:04:30 DKPADMMAIL1
- to remove the header above, you can use header_checks, but you need to
detect which headers to remove (you obviously don't want to remove
headers added by remote systems). with (pcre syntax assumed):
/^Received: \[127\.0\.0\.1\] \(\S+ \S+\)\s+by
mail\.stageline\.hu \(Postfix\) with ESMT
Rich Wales:
> > If sandals.richw.org should not require SASL authentication, then
> > you should not turn on SASL authentication on sandals.richw.org.
>
> Ah. Indeed, I had inadvertently enabled SASL authentication in the
> Sandals SMTP server (smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes in that server's
> Post
On 5/31/2010 7:15 AM, Jarrod Neven wrote:
Noel Jones:
There are no compile options that will affect this. Show
non-verbose postfix logging of a transaction you feel is
handled incorrectly.
Using this config:
# postconf -n
config_directory = /etc/postfix
debug_peer_level = 9
disable_vrfy_comma
On 5/31/2010 11:02 AM, Gabor Illo wrote:
- to remove the header above, you can use header_checks, but you need to
detect which headers to remove (you obviously don't want to remove
headers added by remote systems). with (pcre syntax assumed):
/^Received: \[127\.0\.0\.1\] \(\S+ \S+\)\s+by
mail\.s
Hi all,
I was just alerted by standon about the fact that, while the postfix
manual claims all postscreen_* options are AVAILABLE as of 2.7, this is
not in fact true.
There is a teeny tiny notice on the announce that you need to dump the
2.8 devel executables for postscreen into your 2.7 insta
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> I upgraded recently to 2.7.0 and thought I'd take advantage of the
> nice separation of duties that postscreen provides.
[...]
> Does postscreen also log any DNSBL hits ? I can't seem to find any so far.
Although postconf(5) says the postscreen daemon
Jeroen Geilman:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just alerted by standon about the fact that, while the postfix
> manual claims all postscreen_* options are AVAILABLE as of 2.7, this is
> not in fact true.
> There is a teeny tiny notice on the announce that you need to dump the
> 2.8 devel executables for p
Hi guys,
i recently just setup a high volume postfix server, still in testing mode
before the server go for live, OS rhel 5.5 and postfix version 2.3.3
server with 1 quad core, 8gb ram OS on mirror disk, /var/spool/postfix in
1+0 6 disks, all is SAS 15k disk.
my postfix configuration file will b
On 05/31/2010 08:50 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeroen Geilman:
Hi all,
I was just alerted by standon about the fact that, while the postfix
manual claims all postscreen_* options are AVAILABLE as of 2.7, this is
not in fact true.
There is a teeny tiny notice on the announce that you need to d
On 05/31/2010 08:50 PM, Teh Kim Chooi wrote:
Hi guys,
i recently just setup a high volume postfix server, still in testing
mode before the server go for live, OS rhel 5.5 and postfix version 2.3.3
server with 1 quad core, 8gb ram OS on mirror disk, /var/spool/postfix
in 1+0 6 disks, all is S
Teh Kim Chooi:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi guys,
>
> i recently just setup a high volume postfix server, still in testing mode
> before the server go for live, OS rhel 5.5 and postfix version 2.3.3
Which is no longer maintained. The last release was postfix-2.3.19
in Au
> You're supposed to use sender-dependent AUTHENTICATION in combination
> with sender-dependent RELAYHOST. Otherwise, it makes no sense.
I was trying to describe a situation in which a site might have to deal
with two separate relay hosts . . .
where the choice of relay is dependent on the destin
Rich Wales:
> > You're supposed to use sender-dependent AUTHENTICATION in combination
> > with sender-dependent RELAYHOST. Otherwise, it makes no sense.
>
> I was trying to describe a situation in which a site might have to deal
> with two separate relay hosts . . .
That makes absolutely no sense
Jarrod Neven a écrit :
>> a[snip]
> http://engage.neven.info/postfix-static.txt
>
sigh. This is mail submitted via the sendmail command. such mail is not
subject to smtpd_* parameters. smtpd_* parameters only apply to smtpd
and derived processes.
The sendmail command is used by many programs (in
Gabor Illo a écrit :
>> - to remove the header above, you can use header_checks, but you need to
>> detect which headers to remove (you obviously don't want to remove
>> headers added by remote systems). with (pcre syntax assumed):
>>
>> /^Received: \[127\.0\.0\.1\] \(\S+ \S+\)\s+by
>> mail\.st
It sounds weird to me, the 192.168.1.10 is on server eth0 network interface,
and it will be on my local etc host file, will postfix still do NSlookup ?
since i try inject 100 msgs, there is not time out 5 secs then only start
injecting for the 100 msgs, the 5 secs is the time for 100 msgs to injec
Teh Kim Chooi:
> It sounds weird to me, the 192.168.1.10 is on server eth0 network interface,
> and it will be on my local etc host file, will postfix still do NSlookup ?
The Postfix SMTP server looks up the client hostname with the
getnameinfo() system library routine.
I have attached a test pro
Thanks guys for pointing out that the mail was sent via send mail, I could
not tell that by the logs. SquirrelMail defaults to this and I was not smart
enough to know it needed to be changed.
> - do not post verbose logs unless you are explicitely asked to do so
> - do put your logs in the message
hello all
hello postfix network
hello centos network
I am having problems with my dk and dkim signature of my emails
I have successfully made the process of verification of signatures dnssec
all my domains are correct and good displays on dlv.isc.org
the reason for my problem just the reason t
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, fakessh wrote:
> I am having problems with my dk and dkim signature of my emails
> I have successfully made the process of verification of signatures dnssec
> all my domains are correct and good displays on dlv.isc.org
> the reason for my problem just the reason that I have up
25 matches
Mail list logo
