On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Jack Browning:
No address rewriting is occurring even though Postfix is invoking its
SMTP client to deliver the mail to the remote host, and my generic map
(after postmap and a reload) contains an entry like this:
Hi ,
I have a postfix server running and it needs to be integrated with 3rd party
Policy server. What that server expects is smtp negotiation ie. mail from,
rcpt to along with source IP to be sent to policy server in form of a
HTTP call. Based on the policy, the policy server will return a code
punit jain:
Hi ,
I have a postfix server running and it needs to be integrated with 3rd party
Policy server. What that server expects is smtp negotiation ie. mail from,
rcpt to along with source IP to be sent to policy server in form of a
HTTP call. Based on the policy, the policy server
), but what if things do escalate
and other mail servers join the queue. Thank you, and everyone else for your
input so far.
--
Ioannis
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5165 (20100602) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http
You can also use policyd - cluebringer as 3rd party policy server with
postfix server.
http://www.policyd.org
--
Jawad
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:07 PM
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
postconf -n follows.
At first glance, I notice you redefine several parameters to their
default value. Why? I'll point out just a few of them below.
access_map_reject_code = 554
This is default.
bounce_queue_lifetime = 0
Are you sure
Jack Browning:
Live and learn. Since the fix suggested earlier in this thread --
keying the remote username:password entries to the users' local
addresses -- produces the desired result, the issue didn't involve
generic mapping at all. No generic mapping was done until the message
was
I am getting a lot of these for various domains...
Jun 2 07:21:08 esmtp postfix/smtpd[55535]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail.cypresspartners.com[72.242.211.227]: 450 4.1.8
onlinebanking.ela...@onlinealert.bankofamerica.com: Sender address
rejected: Domain not found;
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:50:53 -0400
Robert Fitzpatrick li...@webtent.net wrote:
I am getting a lot of these for various domains...
Jun 2 07:21:08 esmtp postfix/smtpd[55535]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from mail.cypresspartners.com[72.242.211.227]: 450 4.1.8
* Robert Fitzpatrick li...@webtent.net:
I am getting a lot of these for various domains...
Jun 2 07:21:08 esmtp postfix/smtpd[55535]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from mail.cypresspartners.com[72.242.211.227]: 450 4.1.8
onlinebanking.ela...@onlinealert.bankofamerica.com: Sender address
rejected:
On 2010-06-02 8:21 AM, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
Probably not a good idea, but I was stabbing at things without
really understanding them. I was working from readme's and examples.
the postfix book that I have is good, but incomplete when it comes to
virtual domains and wasn't any help in what
Hi again,
I need to tell postfix to force smtp only for certain senders.
I read http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html which helps me get tls running w/
postfix, plus Client TLS limitations.
I'm thinking of using smtpd with smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes on a different port.
But my main problem is
m listus:
Hi again,
I need to tell postfix to force smtp only for certain senders.
IP addresses? Domain names? Envelope addresses? Different requirements
allow for different solutions. For example, a packet filter redirect
allows you to invisibly switch to a different SMTP server
On 6/2/2010 8:56 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Robert Fitzpatrickli...@webtent.net:
I am getting a lot of these for various domains...
Jun 2 07:21:08 esmtp postfix/smtpd[55535]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from mail.cypresspartners.com[72.242.211.227]: 450 4.1.8
* Robert Fitzpatrick li...@webtent.net:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: LCM Summary
Sent: 6/2/2010 10:18 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
rob...@webtent.com on 6/2/2010 10:19 AM
You do not have permission to send
On 6/2/2010 10:43 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I guess Exchange didn't like that and did reject the mail.
Usually the error message contains info about mailserver generating
this message.
Yes, that is what I hate about Exchange, the error messages vagueness.
Thanks.
Hello,
I've switched few days ago from an old Mac OS X Server 10.3.x / Postfix 2.0.10
to a FreeBSD 7.3 / Postfix 2.7.0.
Since then, I've got various problems. This message will present only one of
them.
Here is my setup:
A postfix mail gateway (MAILGW) doing address rewriting gets emails from
Proniewski Patrick:
Since the migration from Postfix 2.0.10 to Postfix 2.7.0, smtp
logs on LB pool display a huge amount of No answer,timeout
message. From about 0-30 per day, the timeout count has jumped to
1500-5500 per day.
That implies that the load balancer gets no response from Postfix.
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:48:27PM -0400, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
I have several domains that I have non-unix mailboxes (they are
stored by sql using an alternative lmtp daemon after running them
through amavisd-new. This works under the current configuration,
but I'm not bouncing
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:46:39PM +0200, Josef G. Bauer wrote:
Hi Wietse,
thanks for your answer.
/etc/postfix/transport:
.intranet.mydomain.com :
But if an email was addresses to b...@pelikan (without the domain)
wouldn't it be delivered via the relayhost then?
In default
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:14:45PM +0200, Proniewski Patrick wrote:
So it appears that the connection between MAILGW and LB is not always
properly closed. Am I wrong?
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_connection_cache_on_demand
http://www.postfix.org/CONNECTION_CACHE_README.html
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 07:15:15AM -0700, m listus wrote:
I need to tell postfix to force smtp only for certain senders.
This is up to the senders. If they want to disclose the data, they'll
post it on slashdot, without talking to your SMTP server...
There is not much point in MX hosts,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:21:03AM -0400, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
defer_code = 550
Why?
Why not? I'll look more at the docs.
Because it is an incredibly bad idea. Transient errors need to
generate *transient* (4XX) error response codes. Setting the
defer_code to 5XX is about as
On 6/2/2010 1:20 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:21:03AM -0400, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
defer_code = 550
Why?
Why not? I'll look more at the docs.
Because it is an incredibly bad idea. Transient errors need to
generate *transient* (4XX)
cur...@maurand.com a écrit :
Can I also assume that I would use relay_domains and relay_transport?
Correct?
see the ADDRESS CLASS README.
in short, domains/addresses come into many flaours:
- if mail is to be delivered to unix accounts, then
* list the domain in mydestination
* list valid
On 2010-06-02 4:15 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
666 messages blocked by amavis
Hopefully you aren't BOUNCING these ('rejecting' *after* you've accepted
them, which, once they get to amavisd-new, you've accepted them unless
you're using it in a pre-queue filter, which is resource intensive and
only
Hello all,
I am writing to ask for a procedure for sending a broadcast E-Mail to
locally hosted domains on a postfix system.
Currently we use postfixadmin for this, but this is undesirable as it will
often double-up or triple-up entire sends (we intend to fix this,
eventually). I know the
Curtis Maurand put forth on 6/1/2010 2:13 PM:
I was editing the table by hand, but it seemed to be easier to do via
the dbmail administrator and the mysql lookup. two domains, I'm simply
filtering mail for and then sending along to their exchange server via
smtp (sort of a postini type
Yes.. I know this has come up quite a bit, but on freenode in #postfix
this discussion once again erupted when someone mentioned a bug in
postfix and referencing this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=214741
Now, I'm not all that bright on how postfix sorts out the hostname, and
Failure to properly configure Postfix isn't a bug. Documentation exists for a
reason, if a config doesn't work, fix the config. Don't complain because magic
doesn't happen.
I know nothing about debian, and can't speak to any allowanced postfix does or
doesn't make on that platform. I run
On 06/02/2010 11:44 PM, Jim Wright wrote:
Failure to properly configure Postfix isn't a bug. Documentation exists for
a reason, if a config doesn't work, fix the config. Don't complain because
magic doesn't happen.
I know nothing about debian, and can't speak to any allowanced postfix
OS X 10.6.3, attempting to build 2.7.1-RC1:
(snip)
In file included from dns_lookup.c:152:
dns.h:26:28: error: nameser_compat.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [dns_lookup.o] Error 1
make: *** [update] Error 1
In my 2.7 build, I referenced this file: arpa/nameser_compat.h
Jim
On Jun
Matt Hayes wrote (on Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:48:53PM -0400):
On 06/02/2010 11:44 PM, Jim Wright wrote:
Failure to properly configure Postfix isn't a bug. Documentation exists
for a reason, if a config doesn't work, fix the config. Don't complain
because magic doesn't happen.
I
Matt Hayes put forth on 6/2/2010 9:46 PM:
Yes.. I know this has come up quite a bit, but on freenode in #postfix
this discussion once again erupted when someone mentioned a bug in
postfix and referencing this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=214741
Now, I'm not all that
34 matches
Mail list logo
