- Original Message -
From: LuKreme krem...@kreme.com
To: postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 9:31 PM
Subject: Postfix and greylisting
What's the best choice with current 2.7 postfix for enabling greylisting? I
am still using postgrey, but I don't think
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#firewall
I follow link above which now i enable as postfix gateway. I never
enable any transport because i never want to relay incoming mail to
redirect to any smtp. So i follow the link, disable local delivery,
and add these in
Email Sys Admin, NYC | 80-100k+
My New York City client near Penn Station is a leading travel deals and
destination advice publishing firm (online and print). They are seeking a
full-time, on-site, salaried Email Systems Administrator to join their
technology team in the $80,000 to $100,000 range
On 7/19/2010 10:10 AM, Beau Gould (OSS) wrote:
Email Sys Admin, NYC | 80-100k+
No.
I hate unsolicited crap sent to a legit mailing list.
Bugger off.
-Matt
On 7/19/2010 10:21 AM, Beau Gould (OSS) wrote:
This guy liked it and I'll probably get many more resume submissions.
Should I not post any more Postfix jobs to the list in the future because
you hate unsolictied emails? Please advise.
P.S. There are no bugs on me, but thank you for your
Guys,
In any case, both of you did not respect the privacy of the person
applying for the job.
I think that is even worse than posting job openings on a technical
mailing list.
Thanks,
Bas.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:14:17PM +0200, Stefan Foerster wrote:
Given: A dedicated Postfix instance, configured to accept mails from
SASL authenticated users. It seems that unlike access(5) maps, the
lookup for smtpd_sender_login_maps for addresses which contain
$recipient_delimiter is not
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 10:24 -0400, Matt Hayes wrote:
On 7/19/2010 10:21 AM, Beau Gould (OSS) wrote:
This guy liked it and I'll probably get many more resume submissions.
Should I not post any more Postfix jobs to the list in the future because
you hate unsolictied emails? Please advise.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:34:11PM +0200, mouss wrote:
if the exchange box wants j...@example.com, you can add
smtp_generic_maops entries to rewrite the address back:
j...@exchange.example.com j...@example.com
(This only works if the transport to exchange is smtp, as the prefix
of
Il 19/07/2010 23:22, Jonathan Tripathy ha scritto:
On 19/07/10 22:18, Simone Caruso wrote:
Il 19/07/2010 22:56, Jonathan Tripathy ha scritto:
Hi Everyone,
My question isn't directly a Postfix issue, however postfix will be a
fundamental element, and any advice would be appreciated.
I need
Simone Caruso a écrit :
Il 19/07/2010 22:04, Jonathan Tripathy ha scritto:
On 19/07/10 18:07, Angelo Amoruso wrote:
On 16/07/2010 10.10, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have set up a mail server (on a VM) as per this article:
http://workaround.org/ispmail/lenny
I wish to host this
If using BSD or Linux, you can also enable the local packet filter (pf
under BSD, netfilter/iptables under Linux) to only allow explicitely
authorized traffic. if you are familiar with these tools, then you don't
even need a firewall (pf and netfilter/iptables are firewalls, so you
get a self
Jonathan Tripathy a écrit :
[snip]
Does this sound like an acceptable solution?
yes. it is.
for delivery, you can use virtual aliases:
j...@example.comj...@exchange.example.com
if the exchange box wants j...@example.com, you can add
smtp_generic_maops entries to rewrite the
Can you please explain why I would need to use smtp_generic_maps? I'm
not entirely sure of the use of it in this context.
you only need that if your exchange is configured to receive mail for
j...@example.com and not for j...@exchange.example.com.
if you configure exchange to accept
Jonathan Tripathy a écrit :
[snip]
Now that's a cool feature!
However, I think I'll stick with giving the exchange server an
internal domain, like exchange.local, as this is what I'm familiar
with and I have already got this setup to work.
if you can, avoid .local. This is not a
Jonathan Tripathy a écrit :
If using BSD or Linux, you can also enable the local packet filter (pf
under BSD, netfilter/iptables under Linux) to only allow explicitely
authorized traffic. if you are familiar with these tools, then you don't
even need a firewall (pf and netfilter/iptables are
I am not a Xen expert, but AFAICT, you can configure iptables in the VM
and in the host.
note that I am not saying you should do that. it really depends on your
setup. if you can script the work to implement centralized admin, then
it may be worth the pain.
Yeah, I'm using to scripting
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:24:19AM +0200, mouss wrote:
Jonathan Tripathy a ?crit :
[snip]
Now that's a cool feature!
However, I think I'll stick with giving the exchange server an
internal domain, like exchange.local, as this is what I'm familiar
with and I have already
Victor Duchovni Victor.Duchovni at morganstanley.com writes:
Wietse, if I understand correctly, wants to ensure that the issue is
clearly defined, so we don't solve the wrong one, and is worth fixing.
Naturally.
Why does your Dovecot intermittently SIGBUS?
It doesn't. The deliver binary was
* Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:14:17PM +0200, Stefan Foerster wrote:
Given: A dedicated Postfix instance, configured to accept mails from
SASL authenticated users. It seems that unlike access(5) maps, the
lookup for smtpd_sender_login_maps
Hello,
i used the tutorial
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix
to integrate Spamassassin into Postfix.
It works fine - but i want to put the spammails into an separate folder.
How can i do it?
Thanx
Sebastian
21 matches
Mail list logo
