On 09/13/2010 10:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postscreen is a single Postfix 2.8 daemon that keeps spambots away
from Postfix SMTP server processes, so that more Postfix server
resources remain available for handling mail. It will hopefully
become part of the next stable Postfix release.
After ad
* Matt Hayes :
> Thanks for the update. I'm working on implementing this now,
> however, I'm a bit confused with the postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
> option.
Why? It's just for mapping RBL names. Unless you have a paid
subscription with spamhaus.org, you don't need it.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschä
On 2010-09-14 07:24, Richard Chapman wrote:
>>
>> Sep 13 23:18:48 C5 postfix/smtpd[15614]: connect from unknown[192.168.0.166]
>> Sep 13 23:18:48 C5 postfix/smtpd[15614]: 2CA8A1D2145A:
>> client=unknown[192.168.0.166], sasl_method=PLAIN, sasl_username=richard
>> Sep 13 23:18:48 C5 postfix/cleanup[
Hi all,
id like to modify the message postfix sends to the server when it
rejects an email in one of the checks performed.
For example,
450 Helo command rejected: Host not found; http://readhereforemore.info
that administrators which have no clue about email systems have a bit
more informat
Frank Doege:
> On 09/13/2010 10:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Postscreen is a single Postfix 2.8 daemon that keeps spambots away
> > from Postfix SMTP server processes, so that more Postfix server
> > resources remain available for handling mail. It will hopefully
> > become part of the next stab
General postfix question regarding MX lookups..
Does Postfix do an MX lookup on "inbound mail" as part of
"spam" prevention or some other check.. ?
Thx
Charles
* CT :
> General postfix question regarding MX lookups..
>
> Does Postfix do an MX lookup on "inbound mail" as part of
> "spam" prevention or some other check.. ?
How would that help? What exactly are you trying to achieve?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charit
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 13:51:12 CT wrote:
>
> Does Postfix do an MX lookup on "inbound mail" as part of
> "spam" prevention or some other check.. ?
Mind has "check_sender_mx_access" so and logs appropriate messages if the MX
results are unacceptable.
What are you trying to achieve, as it
How to configure postfix only allow tlsv1 connections (no plaintext
allowed) from defined ip ranges? three hosts are needed to communicate
smarthost with tlsv1 only?
br,
--
Eero
On 09/14/2010 08:02 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 13:51:12 CT wrote:
Does Postfix do an MX lookup on "inbound mail" as part of
"spam" prevention or some other check.. ?
Mind has "check_sender_mx_access" so and logs appropriate messages if the MX
results are unacceptable
* CT :
> It was a question that came up in a discussion..
>
> I have had issues in the past when delivering email and I did not
> have PTR in place.. the email was rejected..
That's not an MX problem, but a missing PTR. Postfix can check for
this using:
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
od
Ralf..
> A MX lookup is performed to check if the sender domain exists; it can
> be activated using:
>
> reject_unknown_sender_domain
is what I was looking for..
Thank you ..
Charles
On 09/14/2010 08:18 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* CT:
It was a question that came up in a discussion..
I hav
Hi,
this is my first post here on that list, so I hope my question(s) are welcome :)
I use the current 20100913 snapshot postfix release on a developer server
(testing MTA). Nearly all is working flawlessly, except one problem that I
found in my daily logs (this is a test, I did)
The address
hi guru of postfix
hi mouss and wieste
hi all the users of ths list
my question is simply
is there a way to force startssl on port 25
or it is not a good method
many returns are welcome
On 9/14/2010 1:11 PM, fakessh wrote:
> hi guru of postfix
> hi mouss and wieste
>
> hi all the users of ths list
>
> my question is simply
>
> is there a way to force startssl on port 25
> or it is not a good method
>
> many returns are welcome
>
I don't recommend doing that as not all MTA
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:17:56 -0400, Matt Hayes
wrote:
> On 9/14/2010 1:11 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> hi guru of postfix
>> hi mouss and wieste
>>
>> hi all the users of ths list
>>
>> my question is simply
>>
>> is there a way to force startssl on port 25
>> or it is not a good method
>>
>> many return
On 13.09.10 16:15, Mark Martinec wrote:
> With the help of custom hooks this can be achieved by amavisd itself
Thank you for the sample code and for your detailed explanations regarding
the configuration options.
> The reason the DKIM document suggests not to sign Received header
> fields is for
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of fakessh
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 7:11 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: force startssl on port 25
>
> hi guru of postfix
> hi mouss and wieste
>
> hi all the us
On 09/14/2010 03:06 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
How to configure postfix only allow tlsv1 connections (no plaintext
allowed) from defined ip ranges? three hosts are needed to communicate
smarthost with tlsv1 only?
If these hosts are using you as their smarthost, simply whitelist their
IPs.
On 09/14/2010 12:13 PM, Frank Doege wrote:
Hi all,
id like to modify the message postfix sends to the server when it
rejects an email in one of the checks performed.
For example,
450 Helo command rejected: Host not found; http://readhereforemore.info
Any check_*_access map can return an er
On 09/14/2010 04:42 PM, Christian Rößner wrote:
Sep 11 10:34:36 mx0 postfix/lmtp[29594]: 40FC3520A6:
to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24, delay=0.39,
delays=0.19/0.06/0.01/0.13, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]
Who is that ?
said: 550 5.1.1 User doesn't exist:
ad4f0.5
2010/9/15 Jeroen Geilman :
> On 09/14/2010 03:06 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>
>> How to configure postfix only allow tlsv1 connections (no plaintext
>> allowed) from defined ip ranges? three hosts are needed to communicate
>> smarthost with tlsv1 only?
>>
>>
>
> If these hosts are using you as thei
On 9/14/2010 8:06 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
How to configure postfix only allow tlsv1 connections (no plaintext
allowed) from defined ip ranges? three hosts are needed to communicate
smarthost with tlsv1 only?
br,
--
Eero
Postfix TLS controls are described here
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_READ
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:06:34PM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> How to configure postfix only allow tlsv1 connections (no plaintext
> allowed) from defined ip ranges? three hosts are needed to communicate
> smarthost with tlsv1 only?
The Postfix SMTP server has no per-client TLS cipher/protocol
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 9/14/2010 5:56 PM:
> On 09/14/2010 04:42 PM, Christian Rößner wrote:
>> Sep 11 10:34:36 mx0 postfix/lmtp[29594]: 40FC3520A6:
>> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:24,
>> delay=0.39, delays=0.19/0.06/0.01/0.13, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced
>> (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]
>
> Who
On 09/15/2010 01:47 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/14/2010 12:13 PM, Frank Doege wrote:
Hi all,
id like to modify the message postfix sends to the server when it
rejects an email in one of the checks performed.
For example,
450 Helo command rejected: Host not found; http://readhereforemore.i
26 matches
Mail list logo