Hi List!
I have the following problem: one of our customers got a new domain
"newdomain.com" where all mail addresses have been transferred to. They
also got an old domain "olddomain.com" which had some mail addresses
before. It was decided to not use the old domain for receiving emails
any more (a
Sorry i just spotted a mistake in the telnet example, correct is the
following:
+++ snip2 +++
$ telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to mail.myserver.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mail.myserver.com ESMTP Postfix
ehlo localhost
250-mail.myserver.com
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 26214400
Michael Weissenbacher:
> > BUT - now for every mail that is sent to olddomain.com an ERROR Mail is
> > sent to the Postmaster that looks like this:
> > +++ snip1 +++
> > From: Mail Delivery System [mailto:mailer-dae...@mail.ourserver.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:45 PM
> > To: Postm
Hi Wietse!
Wietse Venema:
>
> Please look at the output from this command:
>
> $ postconf -n notify_classes
>
> This parameter was changed from its default value. Why?
>
> Wietse
>
No, i didn't change that parameter before:
# postconf -n notify_classes
#
Now i changed it to:
noti
Viktor,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:15:37PM -0400, Brian Pribis wrote:
>
>> If I put
>>
>> addr...@virtual_domain m...@gmail.com
>>
>> Shouldn't it simply forward email from the first address to my gmail account?
>
> Yes.
>
>> What h
On 2010-09-21 2:47 AM, Nick Edwards wrote:
> we see no reason to continue to use dovecot in its current state with
> its inherit risks when courier has none of them, the move to courier is
> now justified.
Just to correct the record...
Since the 'risk' you reference is inherent to using IMAP + N
Michael Weissenbacher:
> Hi Wietse!
>
> Wietse Venema:
> >
> > Please look at the output from this command:
> >
> > $ postconf -n notify_classes
> >
> > This parameter was changed from its default value. Why?
> >
> > Wietse
> >
> No, i didn't change that parameter before:
> # postconf
Hi Wietse!
>
> Perhaps some helpful maintainer changed the default setting.
>
> Please try the following:
>
> $ postconf -d notify_classes
>
> The command output should be:
>
> notify_classes = resource, software
>
> Apparently, YOUR machine was configured to also notify the postmaste
Michael Weissenbacher:
> In: MAIL From: SIZE=28675
> Out: 250 2.1.0 Ok
> In: RCPT To:
> Out: 451 4.3.5 Server configuration error
Oops. You are getting postmaster noticifications because of the
"Server configuration error". See the maillog file for details.
You need to fix that regardless.
Hi Wietse!
>
> Oops. You are getting postmaster noticifications because of the
> "Server configuration error". See the maillog file for details.
> You need to fix that regardless.
>
Sorry for the stupid question, but is maillog == /var/log/mail.log ?
I think i may have found the problem, i foun
Michael Weissenbacher:
> Sep 21 15:04:58 smtp1 postfix/smtpd[14679]: warning: unknown smtpd
> restriction: "med"
That is also a configuration error.
Wietse
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:36:49AM -0400, Brian Pribis wrote:
> br...@virtual_domain.cc brian #brian is a real account on the server.
Postfix configuration files DO NOT support comments that follow data on
the *same* line. I hope that this "comment" is just in this message to
describe the rule,
Hi Wietse!
> Michael Weissenbacher:
>> Sep 21 15:04:58 smtp1 postfix/smtpd[14679]: warning: unknown smtpd
>> restriction: "med"
>
> That is also a configuration error.
>
This error was really HARD to track. Took me the whole day. But now i
finally found the real cause. On this server I am using t
Michael Weissenbacher:
> Hi Wietse!
>
> > Michael Weissenbacher:
> >> Sep 21 15:04:58 smtp1 postfix/smtpd[14679]: warning: unknown smtpd
> >> restriction: "med"
> >
> > That is also a configuration error.
> >
> This error was really HARD to track. Took me the whole day. But now i
> finally found
On 09/21/2010 01:06 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/20/2010 6:01 PM:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:56:14AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Yes, when traffic to the destination is light (message deliveries
are spaced multiple seconds or more apart) or is very heavy (
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
closest param I've found so far are always_bcc & friends, but these
lose some information (at least the BCC field). Thanks in advance for
any hints.
--
Yang Zhang
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
> How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
> complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients?
You can't. [Typically someone on this list will chime in that doing so
is trivial if you just read the docs
On 09/21/2010 08:56 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
closest param I've found so far are always_bcc& friends, but these
lose some information (at least the BCC field). Th
On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients?
You can't.
Of course you can.
That's what alwa
Yang Zhang:
> How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
> complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
> closest param I've found so far are always_bcc & friends, but these
> lose some information (at least the BCC field). Thanks in advance for
> an
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 21:07 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
> >> How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
> >> complete form (all headers + payload) as received
they haven't started shouting yet, but i sense it's coming.
i just swapped postfix in for sendmail on a mail server.
are there any metrics i can get to show why postfix is better?
they seem to be all up in arms about memory usage.
but doing this
ps -eo pid,vsz,rss,pmem,time,comm | grep sendmail
On 09/21/2010 09:12 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 21:07 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in t
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Welcome to mail server operations 101. :) You've got a lot to learn,
> but there's time. The internet isn't going away tomorrow. Stick around
> and read all the posts. You can learn quite a bit.
>
Yes, I know I have a lot to learn. Mail server operations 101 is wh
On 09/21/2010 09:18 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
they haven't started shouting yet, but i sense it's coming.
i just swapped postfix in for sendmail on a mail server.
Congratulations , you've arrived on the right side of sanity :)
are there any metrics i can get to show why postfix is better?
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:56:41AM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
> How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
> complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
> closest param I've found so far are always_bcc & friends, but these
> lose some information (at
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:18:32PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote:
> i just swapped postfix in for sendmail on a mail server.
> are there any metrics i can get to show why postfix is better?
[ Sendmail probably evolved in some respects since I've last looked
at it closely. The below may be somewhat
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:56:41AM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
>
>> How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
>> complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
>> closest param I've found so far
Hi!
Since yesterday I am experiencing big problems when delivering mail to
an alias-list. (Yes, I have set up an owner-listname alias. :-))
When delivering mail to a list which is implemented as an
ldap-alias-list (currently 289 recipients), the local daemon delivers
most of the mails to local ma
Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
> Hi!
>
> Since yesterday I am experiencing big problems when delivering mail to
> an alias-list. (Yes, I have set up an owner-listname alias. :-))
Do you have the RIGHT owner-listname alias.
> When delivering mail to a list which is implemented as an
> ldap-alias-list
On 09/21/2010 10:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
>> Since yesterday I am experiencing big problems when delivering mail to
>> an alias-list. (Yes, I have set up an owner-listname alias. :-))
>
> Do you have the RIGHT owner-listname alias.
This seems to be the problem.
I h
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:19:00PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
> > The archives of this list contain suggestions of how to achieve this
> > with a regexp or pcre recipient_bcc_maps which generates copies of
> > the message without losing envelope information.
>
> Was this the technique?
>
> http://
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:19:00PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
>
>> > The archives of this list contain suggestions of how to achieve this
>> > with a regexp or pcre recipient_bcc_maps which generates copies of
>> > the message without losing
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:13:33PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:19:00PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
> >
> >> > The archives of this list contain suggestions of how to achieve this
> >> > with a regexp or pcre reci
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:13:33PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:19:00PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
>> >
>> >> > The archives of this list contain sug
Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
> On 09/21/2010 10:57 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth:
> >> Since yesterday I am experiencing big problems when delivering mail to
> >> an alias-list. (Yes, I have set up an owner-listname alias. :-))
> >
> > Do you have the RIGHT owner-listname alia
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:47 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Seth Mattinen
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, we have over the weekend ran two testbeds at full thrashing
> with in house written scripts, the timings show after 57 hours
Wietse Venema put forth on 9/21/2010 10:12 AM:
> Michael Weissenbacher:
>> Hi Wietse!
>>
>>> Michael Weissenbacher:
Sep 21 15:04:58 smtp1 postfix/smtpd[14679]: warning: unknown smtpd
restriction: "med"
>>>
>>> That is also a configuration error.
>>>
>> This error was really HARD to track.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:41:11PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
> >> That's what it does - it generates u...@domain@bcc.invalid - but I was
> >> looking for something that preserves the BCC headers.
> >
> > You are mightily confused. ?Bcc headers are never sent by the MUA,
> > so there is nothing to p
bper put forth on 9/21/2010 2:26 PM:
> Point taken. I have, and still am, investigating AV scanning. What are your
> thoughts on the best solution/fit with postfix?
Someone else will need to answer. I don't do A/V scanning in Postfix.
I simply reject any emails, using mime_header_checks, that co
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:09:13PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> bper put forth on 9/21/2010 2:26 PM:
>
> > Point taken. I have, and still am, investigating AV scanning. What are your
> > thoughts on the best solution/fit with postfix?
>
> Someone else will need to answer. I don't do A/V scanni
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:41:11PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
>
>> >> That's what it does - it generates u...@domain@bcc.invalid - but I was
>> >> looking for something that preserves the BCC headers.
>> >
>> > You are mightily confused. ?Bcc
42 matches
Mail list logo
