Am 26.11.2010 08:59, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> Hi,
>
> I need to create statistics for postfix mailserver, mainly counting
> number each user incoming and outcoming emails/day.
>
> What is best software for this kind of statics?
>
> br,
> --
> Eero
try awstats, pflogsumm etc
--
Best Regards
On 25 November 2010 14:11, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:54:49PM +0100, Mauro wrote:
>> I have a file: recipient_checks with mym...@example.com REJECT and the
>> corresponding hashed recipient_checks.db.
>> In main.cf I have:
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>> ..
>>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Alan's a good ol' boy and friend and colleague of mine, but I told
> him that hardcoding the version into those pathnames is a bad idea.
> Sure enough, he won't listen to me. :)
I got rid of all the versioning stuff, cleaned out the old package
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 09:35:06AM +0100, Mauro wrote:
> On 25 November 2010 14:11, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:54:49PM +0100, Mauro wrote:
> >> I have a file: recipient_checks with mym...@example.com REJECT
> >> and the corresponding hashed recipient_checks.db.
> >> In main.cf
Hello,
unfortunately, @work we are hosted at microsoftonline.com.
Since monday, we are getting mail delays with one of our partners, and
I could track it down to address verification getting timeouts.
Has anyone else seen that problem, or is it just one isolated problem?
Thank you for your input
Arnim Sommer:
> Hello,
> unfortunately, @work we are hosted at microsoftonline.com.
>
> Since monday, we are getting mail delays with one of our partners, and
> I could track it down to address verification getting timeouts.
>
> Has anyone else seen that problem, or is it just one isolated proble
2010/11/26 Wietse Venema :
> Arnim Sommer:
>> Hello,
>> unfortunately, @work we are hosted at microsoftonline.com.
>>
>> Since monday, we are getting mail delays with one of our partners, and
>> I could track it down to address verification getting timeouts.
>>
>> Has anyone else seen that problem,
Hello,
well, I just set
internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce
but after unsuccessful mail delivery sender still gets email with
subject "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"..
I also did with
internal_mail_filter_classes = notify
result is the same..
Maybe you did not understood my question corr
Lukas:
> Hello,
>
> well, I just set
> internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce
> but after unsuccessful mail delivery sender still gets email with
> subject "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"..
> I also did with
> internal_mail_filter_classes = notify
> result is the same..
>
> Maybe you did no
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Lukas:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> ?well, I just set
> >> internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce
> >> but after unsuccessful mail delivery sender still gets email with
> >> subject "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"..
> >> I also did with
> >
Ok :)
but any way, do you know answer the answer to my question?
L
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > Lukas:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> ?well, I just set
>> >> internal_mail_filter_classes = bounce
>> >> but after un
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 09:43:14PM +0200, Lukas wrote:
> Ok :)
> but any way, do you know answer the answer to my question?
Habitually sending mail to large list is very different from routine
mail delivery. The cost shifts from building a functioning mail delivery
pipeline to building a list-man
Lukas:
> Maybe you did not understood my question correctly - I need my smtp
> server not to send this "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" after it
> can not delivery mail to recipient.. Is that possible?
Wietse:
> What are you: a spammer?
Lukas:
> Why you think about the spam only a? :)
> No,
Lukas put forth on 11/25/2010 9:38 AM:
> Hello,
>
> my question is about not sending "non-delivery notification". I want
> to tell postfix, that in case on non delivery it has not to send any
> messages.. Is it possible?
> It should be useful for mass mailing servers..
>
> --
> Lukas
> UAB nSof
___
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Behalf Of Arnim Sommer [rantho...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, 26 November 2010 11:11 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Mail.Global.FrontBridge.com
>Hello,
>unfortunately, @
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 10:38 AM, Laszlo Kupor wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I manage a mixed mail system (postfix, sendmail, etc).
> >
>
> Meaning ?
> You shouldn't run multiple MTAs on the same system.
Eh.. Sorry.. This means: system not only "one machine".
I run mailhubs to rece
Laszlo Kupor:
> Everything works nice, but bounce. Bouncing works, but communicate the
> local address with the outer world which not acceptable.
Sorry, it is bad practice to throw away all delivery error reports.
> I can send Bounce message with MTA (postfix) but this contains delivery
> status
postfix-2.8-20101126 implements pattern matching for DNSB/WL results.
For example, "reject_rbl_client example.com=127.0.0.[2,4,6..8]"
rejects clients when the lookup result is 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.4,
127.0.0.6, 127.0.0.7, or 127.0.0.8. This is the same result as
with "postscr
ofFullDisclosure, I work at what was formerly known as BigFish, then
Frontbridge, but is now Forefront Online for Office, in the capacity of
Knowledge Engineer (Spam Analysis), and among other things help out with abuse
and deliverability issues.
And also... this discussion really doesn't seem
On 2010-11-26, Michael J Wise wrote:
>
Michael,
Here is a very quick description of the issue.
Frontbridge advertises that it supports pipelined requests. But it
disconnects after the current request is served if any request in the
pipeline is a QUIT.
This causes a serious problem because send
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:42 PM, Stephen Thorne wrote:
> On 2010-11-26, Michael J Wise wrote:
>>
>
> Michael,
>
> Here is a very quick description of the issue.
>
> Frontbridge advertises that it supports pipelined requests. But it
> disconnects after the current request is served if any request i
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:50 PM, Michael J Wise wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:42 PM, Stephen Thorne wrote:
>> Our only option at this point is to turn off pipelining when talking to
>> frontbridge, because frontbridge's pipelines are broken. This is a
>> terribly negative thing. It would be much be
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 09:59:08PM -0800, Michael J Wise wrote:
> That having been said
>
> On Nov 26, 2010, at 1:36 PM, Terry Gilsenan wrote:
Yes, Terry was posturing. No need to take it too seriously. Putting the
posturing aside, there is an underlying interoperability issue. The new
softw
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:03:58PM -0800, Michael J Wise wrote:
> I do not know how fast (or even if) this can be addressed, it's so
> not my department, but I will do my best to present the issue to the
> right people and assert its importance and annoyance factor to the rest
> of the community,
On 11/27/2010 01:06 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Postfix is perhaps more modular than Exchange, and with just two or so
developers looking at the code, reports of a similar bug in the Postfix
smtpd(8) probably would result in a fix by Monday. :-)
Then Postfix is doing it wrong! :P
25 matches
Mail list logo
