On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > Alan's a good ol' boy and friend and colleague of mine, but I told > him that hardcoding the version into those pathnames is a bad idea. > Sure enough, he won't listen to me. :)
I got rid of all the versioning stuff, cleaned out the old package and voila! it worked. I am though still fairly confident that this problem is due to some mishap on my part, and not on Alan's script. I've used that script for a while now, without any issues. But since I don't mind _not_ having the version hardcoded into various pathnames, I might as well get rid of them. Thanks. :o)
