I couldn't find any 2.8.0-1 SRPMS.
Hello all,
On a postfix server i have some strange things in logs files, and i
don't know what's happening.
Jan 22 23:54:07 mail postfix/trivial-rewrite[10285]: warning: mysql
query failed: Illegal mix of collations (latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and
(utf8_unicode_ci,COERCIBLE) for operation '='
collation is normally a table property
your mysql-tables charset should be uTF8
Am 24.01.2011 10:17, schrieb Claudio Prono:
Hello all,
On a postfix server i have some strange things in logs files, and i
don't know what's happening.
Jan 22 23:54:07 mail postfix/trivial-rewrite[10285]:
take the latest srpm of your distributions version
as base and remove patches from the SPEC-File
Am 24.01.2011 10:01, schrieb Walter Pinto:
I couldn't find any 2.8.0-1 SRPMS.
--
Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
CTO /
Reindl Harald ha scritto:
collation is normally a table property
your mysql-tables charset should be uTF8
How i can check this?
Am 24.01.2011 10:17, schrieb Claudio Prono:
Hello all,
On a postfix server i have some strange things in logs files, and i
don't know what's happening.
Am 24.01.2011 11:15, schrieb Claudio Prono:
Reindl Harald ha scritto:
collation is normally a table property
your mysql-tables charset should be uTF8
How i can check this?
show create table tablename;
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reindl Harald ha scritto:
show create table tablename;
Ok, something strange is come out.
Here is the list of tables on postfix database:
+---+
| Tables_in_postfix |
+---+
| admin |
| alias |
| alias_domain
I think this can be a problem and would recommend to
force UTF8 for all tables, if there are only LATIN1 data
they should not be touched in any way and if all is UTF8
there is no point of mixing
Well, normally we use LATIN1 historical for some thounsand
tables but the whole database for
Reindl Harald ha scritto:
I think this can be a problem and would recommend to
force UTF8 for all tables, if there are only LATIN1 data
they should not be touched in any way and if all is UTF8
there is no point of mixing
Well, normally we use LATIN1 historical for some thounsand
tables
Am 24.01.2011 14:17, schrieb Claudio Prono:
- How i can force UTF8 for all the tables?
alter table will be your friend - mysql manual
- If i change all into UTF8, can be some data loss or some risk at all?
normally not because there is nothing in LATIN1 which is not supported
in UTF8, in
dear all,
i'm going to setup a backup-MX, and although i've now a working
solution, I'd like to ask, if this is the correct solution ...
PART 1 (working):
Backup for domain.com with a list of valid recipients in a database. my
main.cf looks like:
---
relay_domains =
Dear list,
We want to implement blacklisting sender email addresses on a per-domain basis.
I know it can be done by Amavis but I would like to implement this
directly in Postfix.
Is this possible?
Thx,
P.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:17:25AM +0100, Claudio Prono wrote:
On a postfix server i have some strange things in logs files, and i
don't know what's happening.
Jan 22 23:54:07 mail postfix/trivial-rewrite[10285]: warning: mysql
query failed: Illegal mix of collations
Sometimes the postscreen process behaviour is:
( After postfix stop, another postscreen is started, look PID number! )
# postconf mail_version
mail_version = 2.8.0
# date
Mon Jan 24 16:21:45 CET 2011
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
# ps -fe |grep postscreen
postfix
Hi,
I am new to postfix. I have been searching on how to do this but unable to
find
an answer. I wonder if someone could help.
I have postfix setup to deliver all emails to @my-domain.com to an smrsh
script.
So in my aliases file I have
mydomain-com:|/my-script.php
The problem is if postfix
What MySQL makes of such data is up to the MySQL client and server
libraries, but Postfix does not promise that the input will be well-formed
UTF-8, or ISO Latin or anything of the sort. Just an array of bytes.
Right, as it should be. Envelope addresses are not associated with any
character
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:52:18PM +0100, Heinz A. Krebs wrote:
dear all,
i'm going to setup a backup-MX, and although i've now a working
solution, I'd like to ask, if this is the correct solution ...
PART 1 (working):
Backup for domain.com with a list of valid recipients in a database.
Stefano Mason:
Sometimes the postscreen process behaviour is:
( After postfix stop, another postscreen is started, look PID number! )
By design, postscreen finishes ongoing work in the background.
Wietse
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:53:06PM +, ira darwin wrote:
I am new to postfix. I have been searching on how to do this but unable to
find an answer. I wonder if someone could help.
I have postfix setup to deliver all emails to @my-domain.com to an smrsh
script.
It is not clear why
On 1/24/2011 9:12 AM, polloxx wrote:
Dear list,
We want to implement blacklisting sender email addresses on a per-domain basis.
I know it can be done by Amavis but I would like to implement this
directly in Postfix.
Is this possible?
Thx,
P.
Yes, using smtpd_restriction_classes. General
Thank you Victor for taking the time to answer my questions. Please see
respond inline
On 24 January 2011 16:46, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
wrote:
snip
I have postfix setup to deliver all emails to @my-domain.com to an smrsh
script.
It is not clear why forgetting
Mark Martinec ha scritto:
What MySQL makes of such data is up to the MySQL client and server
libraries, but Postfix does not promise that the input will be well-formed
UTF-8, or ISO Latin or anything of the sort. Just an array of bytes.
Right, as it should be. Envelope addresses are
On 1/24/2011 11:20 AM, polofuzzu wrote:
Thank you Victor for taking the time to answer my questions.
Please see respond inline
On 24 January 2011 16:46, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
mailto:victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
snip
I have postfix setup to deliver
On 24 January 2011 17:35, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 1/24/2011 11:20 AM, polofuzzu wrote:
Thank you Victor for taking the time to answer my questions.
Please see respond inline
On 24 January 2011 16:46, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
* Stefano Mason stefano.ma...@t-systems.it:
Sometimes the postscreen process behaviour is:
( After postfix stop, another postscreen is started, look PID number! )
Yes, I've seen this once or twice, but assumed it was somehow my fault.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung
On 1/24/11 4:52 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
What MySQL makes of such data is up to the MySQL client and server
libraries, but Postfix does not promise that the input will be well-formed
UTF-8, or ISO Latin or anything of the sort. Just an array of bytes.
Right, as it should be. Envelope addresses
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
The postscreen daemon creates a child and finishes work in the
background. The parent terminates immediately.
Meaning it's safe to igore and it will go away eventually. Fine.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité -
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:51:09PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Right, as it should be. Envelope addresses are not associated with any
character set according to RFC 5321, they are just strings of octets.
Urgh. Which RFC are you reading ?
Pedantically correct, but useless. Mark is well aware
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 05:38:55PM +, polofuzzu wrote:
Acting on the headers is broken by design.
You should be acting on the envelope information, not headers.
I wholeheartedly agree. But unfortunately that is the boundaries I have
been given to work with. The script is unmodifiable,
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Urgh. Which RFC are you reading ?
I quote:
Systems MUST NOT define mailboxes in such a way as to require the use
in SMTP of non-ASCII characters
True (tell it to generators of malicious mail or just incompetent sending sw).
This does not prevent illegal data to appear
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:07:33PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
There is also an initiative to allow UTF-8 characters to appear in SMTP
(RFC 5336 and related documents).
I looked at these RFCs, I am not encouraged by what I see. They look
deeply flawed...
--
Viktor.
Mark Martinec:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Urgh. Which RFC are you reading ?
I quote:
Systems MUST NOT define mailboxes in such a way as to require the use
in SMTP of non-ASCII characters
True (tell it to generators of malicious mail or just incompetent sending sw).
This does not prevent
Hello,
my mail users are all local users, added in /etc/passwd and
/etc/shadow. Therefore, the virtual alias maps file looks like
u...@myvirtualdomain.tld user1. All works like a charm, however, the
Delivered-To header reads us...@fqdn.myhostname.tld
Is this on purpose, can this be changed?
I
Florian Effenberger:
Hello,
my mail users are all local users, added in /etc/passwd and
/etc/shadow. Therefore, the virtual alias maps file looks like
u...@myvirtualdomain.tld user1. All works like a charm, however, the
Delivered-To header reads us...@fqdn.myhostname.tld
Is this on
On 1/24/11 8:07 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Urgh. Which RFC are you reading ?
I quote:
Systems MUST NOT define mailboxes in such a way as to require the use
in SMTP of non-ASCII characters
True (tell it to generators of malicious mail or just incompetent sending sw).
This
On Monday 24 January 2011 18:38:55 polofuzzu wrote:
On 24 January 2011 17:35, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 1/24/2011 11:20 AM, polofuzzu wrote:
Thank you Victor for taking the time to answer my questions.
Please see respond inline
On 24 January 2011 16:46, Victor
On 1/24/11 9:33 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Just curious, how does the script handle BCC ?
Eg. where none of the TO and CC headers actually contain a valid email for
the domain because that was in the BCC?
I suppose it doesn't matter in the slightest.
If the script goes off the header addresses
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:45 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: problem with log file entry
Jack:
I see this particular warning:
Jan 20
Jack:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 12:45 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: problem with log file entry
Jack:
I see this particular
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 04:07:10PM -0500, Jack wrote:
OK in further testing I see that the /usr/local/lib/policyd-spf-perl is not
responding with anything. I can from other servers get it to respond with a
pass/fail/neutral etc.
I never get a response from this particular server.
I'm not
40 matches
Mail list logo
