* Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
I think Ralph meant: do you have an example how one would query this DNSBL ?
Is there public documentation for using the SenderBase DNSBL?
Postfix has native support for querying DNS A-record-based
blacklists; if this one uses a different query mechanism,
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/4/2011 2:18 AM:
* Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
I think Ralph meant: do you have an example how one would query this DNSBL ?
Is there public documentation for using the SenderBase DNSBL?
Do you have me kill filed or something Ralf? I answered this
Zitat von Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:51:36AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
That will create a separate queue from the outgoing mail which is using
the smtp transport,
There is one queue.
Physically, yes. Logically, and this is what matters
On 02/04/2011 08:36 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 03/02/2011 10:24, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent ) with
Maiidir format ?
vacation has nothing to
On 2/4/2011 4:02 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
On 02/04/2011 08:36 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 03/02/2011 10:24, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent ) with
On 2/4/2011 4:19 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
On 2/4/2011 4:02 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
On 02/04/2011 08:36 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 03/02/2011 10:24, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/4/2011 2:18 AM:
* Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
I think Ralph meant: do you have an example how one would query this DNSBL
?
Is there public documentation for using the SenderBase DNSBL?
Do you have me
On 02/04/2011 05:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Steve Jenkins put forth on 2/3/2011 11:18 AM:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM, J4K ju...@klunky.co.uk wrote:
Its a good idea, but this would limit a user from using a server on his
residential ADSL from being an Email server, and force them to use
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/4/2011 3:36 AM:
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/4/2011 2:18 AM:
* Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl:
I think Ralph meant: do you have an example how one would query this DNSBL
?
Is there public documentation for using
While we do not have Postfix 2.8 (in Debian/Ubuntu) and its postscreen
processor,
Is there someone in this list with experience of using the
Gross greylist app. with Postfix?
Is it stable?
Is it less resource hungry than greyfix or postgrey?
Has it major problems?
Regards,
M.
Am 04.02.2011 11:20, schrieb J4K:
I agree. I have plenty of colleagues who run their own mail servers from
residential connections and they know how to set-up their machines.
Maybe, but if they are running a mailserver form dial-up ranges
mail seems not to be important for them because
On 02/04/2011 11:45 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
J4K put forth on 2/4/2011 4:20 AM:
Back to the Stan's pcre file:- I've been running through the logs for
rejects specifically caused by this file (or prepends). However I did
not see any. Is there a string I could search for,
Try:
~$ egrep
On 02/04/2011 11:53 AM, J4K wrote:
On 02/04/2011 11:45 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
J4K put forth on 2/4/2011 4:20 AM:
Back to the Stan's pcre file:- I've been running through the logs for
rejects specifically caused by this file (or prepends). However I did
not see any. Is there a string I
Reindl Harald put forth on 2/4/2011 4:35 AM:
Am 04.02.2011 11:20, schrieb J4K:
I agree. I have plenty of colleagues who run their own mail servers from
residential connections and they know how to set-up their machines.
Maybe, but if they are running a mailserver form dial-up ranges
Le vendredi 04 février 2011 à 10:28 +, Mark Alan a écrit :
While we do not have Postfix 2.8 (in Debian/Ubuntu) and its postscreen
processor,
Is there someone in this list with experience of using the
Gross greylist app. with Postfix?
Is it stable?
Is it less resource hungry than
On 02/03/2011 08:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.02.2011 20:05, schrieb Chris Tandiono:
You can get a multi-domain SSL certificate. It is one certificate that lists
all the
domains for which it is valid.
in theory xes
but this is not scaleable
If you get 3 new customers with their own
Le lundi 31 janvier 2011 à 00:50 +0100, mouss a écrit :
Le 31/01/2011 00:09, Steve Jenkins a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 1:23 PM, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Le 29/01/2011 22:19, David Touzeau a écrit :
Dear
I would like to tune postfix smtp sender according specific
Zitat von Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 04.02.2011 11:20, schrieb J4K:
I agree. I have plenty of colleagues who run their own mail servers from
residential connections and they know how to set-up their machines.
Maybe, but if they are running a mailserver form dial-up ranges
On 02/04/2011 11:45 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
J4K put forth on 2/4/2011 4:20 AM:
Back to the Stan's pcre file:- I've been running through the logs for
rejects specifically caused by this file (or prepends). However I did
not see any. Is there a string I could search for,
Try:
~$ egrep
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:48:08 -0600
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com articulated:
Well, I think there's a bit more to it than that. Some distros have
various policies in place that hinder rapid inclusion. That said, if
Sahil were associated with the Debian project instead of or in
Hello , i've a question , i want do configure postfix to use external
dns like (8.8.8.8) to resolve every domain (lookup for examples)
for incoming mail and outgoing mail. I don't want to use local dns on
postfix server is it possible?
Is it possible to use :
smtp_host_lookup = ?
Thank's a
On 2/4/2011 8:39 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
Hello , i've a question , i want do configure postfix to use
external dns like (8.8.8.8) to resolve every domain (lookup
for examples)
for incoming mail and outgoing mail. I don't want to use local
dns on postfix server is it possible?
Is it possible
On 2/4/2011 8:42 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/4/2011 8:39 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
Hello , i've a question , i want do configure postfix to use
external dns like (8.8.8.8) to resolve every domain (lookup
for examples)
for incoming mail and outgoing mail. I don't want to use local
dns on postfix
Ok thank's in alternative is it possible use of
disable_dns_lookups=yes
to increase performance?
My postfix server is a virtual mail server
With mysql backend
Il 04/02/2011 15:44, Noel Jones ha scritto:
On 2/4/2011 8:42 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 2/4/2011 8:39 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
* Matteo Cazzador mat...@netlite.it:
Ok thank's in alternative is it possible use of
disable_dns_lookups=yes
to increase performance?
Uhm, your server probably won't be able to send out mail out after
that change, but at least it will do this quickly.
My postfix server is a virtual mail
Than'k a lot and excuse me if i'm not so clear:
my local dns server , that is postfix server to, is used to filter
navigation of client (by domain black list)
so my local dns is under pressure and often mail give me error resolving
dns while sending mail to external.
I need to limitate this
* Matteo Cazzador mat...@netlite.it:
Than'k a lot and excuse me if i'm not so clear:
my local dns server , that is postfix server to, is used to filter
navigation of client (by domain black list)
so my local dns is under pressure and often mail give me error
resolving dns while sending mail
Hi,
I just finished setting up Postfix to use sasl/external with auxprop
plugin ldapdb. So far, anything works like a charm. But I had to disable
chroot.
Currently with not chrooting, I have:
/etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf (yes, it is Ubuntu):
/etc/postfix/.ldaprc
/ca/cacert_org.crt
hello here's my error log
192.168.0.10 = internal client ip
now i've seen this strange mysql error maybe this is the real problem
Feb 4 00:00:58 localhost postfix/trivial-rewrite[2579]: warning: mysql
query failed: Illegal mix of collations (latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and
* Matteo Cazzador mat...@netlite.it:
hello here's my error log
192.168.0.10 = internal client ip
now i've seen this strange mysql error maybe this is the real problem
Yes!
Feb 4 00:00:58 localhost postfix/trivial-rewrite[2579]: warning: mysql query
failed: Illegal mix of collations
Zitat von Matteo Cazzador mat...@netlite.it:
Than'k a lot and excuse me if i'm not so clear:
my local dns server , that is postfix server to, is used to filter
navigation of client (by domain black list)
so my local dns is under pressure and often mail give me error
resolving dns while
Am 04.02.2011 16:32, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
So you have a local caching-resolver on the Postfix box?
If so it should not fail because of traffic as long as your system resources
are not exhausted.
If your system resources are exhausted using a different resolver does not
help.
Christian Roessner:
I have no idea, what libs, etc. are also required to be copied to
chroot.
To find out what files are missing, use strace, as described in
the DEBUG_README file. This will show the explicit names of files
and directories in open(), stat() etc. calls.
It won't show you the
On 2/4/2011 10:50 AM, Matteo Cazzador wrote:
Sure, thank's a lot everybody, i think the problem is related to:
warning: mysql query failed: Illegal mix of collations
(latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and (utf8_general_ci,COERCIBLE)
operation '='
that cause
warning: transport_maps lookup
I have no idea, what libs, etc. are also required to be copied to
chroot.
To find out what files are missing, use strace, as described in
the DEBUG_README file. This will show the explicit names of files
and directories in open(), stat() etc. calls.
It won't show you the implicit names
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:18 AM, J4K ju...@klunky.co.uk wrote:
I think there is a typo in the file:
/^ip[12]?[0-9]{1,2}(-[12]?[0-9]{1,2}){3}\.adsl2?\.static\.versatel\.nl$/
PREPEND X-GenericStaticHELO: (versatel.ml)
should read /ml/nl/
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
CentOS 5.5, their latest, ships with Postfix 2.3.3, which hasn't been
supported by Wietse for quite some time. A new install of CentOS 5.5
gives you an officially unsupported Postfix, thought I'm sure CentOS
will
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:52:05PM +0100, David Touzeau wrote:
Is it supported to set parameters in command line directly in master cf
eg ?
No.
slowsmtp unix - - n - - smtp
The above goes in master.cf with no -o ... options.
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:56:51AM +0100, J4K wrote:
Thank-you for the example. Can the /etc/postfix/whitelist be an
empty file?
Answering my own question:-
# ls -l /etc/postfix/whitelist
-rw-r- 1 root root 0 Feb 4 11:53 /etc/postfix/whitelist
Feb 4 11:53:17 logout
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:27:35PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:56:51AM +0100, J4K wrote:
Thank-you for the example. Can the /etc/postfix/whitelist be an
empty file?
Answering my own question:-
# ls -l /etc/postfix/whitelist
-rw-r- 1 root root 0 Feb 4
Le vendredi 04 février 2011 à 14:16 -0500, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:52:05PM +0100, David Touzeau wrote:
Is it supported to set parameters in command line directly in master cf
eg ?
No.
slowsmtp unix - - n - - smtp
The above goes
On 02/04/2011 10:42 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Still, I am (well, WAS) disappointed that Postfix 2.3.3 is what
installs on CentOS 5.5 by default. But Postfix 2.8 wasn't that hard to
compile. :)
I always try to work with the package management system to keep things
sane and manageable if
Hi Postfix list,
I'm having a bit of a problem with aliases and receiving emails on the
submission port.
I have a list of aliases in /etc/aliases, such as
--
root: michel, kevin, julien
--
I run postalias /etc/aliases and obtain a proper db file
--
# ls -l /etc/aliases*
On 2/4/2011 2:59 PM, Julien Vehent wrote:
But, if I do the same on submission port 587, I get an 'Undelivered
Mail Returned to Sender' containing the following:
--
r...@example.net: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said:
550-Mailbox unknown.
Either there is no mailbox associated with
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 02:59:12PM -0500, Julien Vehent wrote:
The declaration of the submission service in /etc/postfix/master.cf is as
follow:
--
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
# -o
[ Reply-To: set to self as this is no longer on topic for the list ]
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:20:45AM +0100, J4K wrote:
On 02/04/2011 05:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Steve Jenkins put forth on 2/3/2011 11:18 AM:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM, J4K ju...@klunky.co.uk wrote:
Its a good
Hi!
There is any way to drop/reject mail which number of recipient
addresses are X+1 (X is the accepted limit configured ;) )?
I known that the smtpd_recipient_limit splits the to fit the
recipients configured limit but what I need is to drop/reject the
message, not to split it.
Thanks
J4K put forth on 2/4/2011 7:18 AM:
I think there is a typo in the file:
/^ip[12]?[0-9]{1,2}(-[12]?[0-9]{1,2}){3}\.adsl2?\.static\.versatel\.nl$/
PREPEND X-GenericStaticHELO: (versatel.ml)
should read /ml/nl/
/^ip[12]?[0-9]{1,2}(-[12]?[0-9]{1,2}){3}\.adsl2?\.static\.versatel\.nl$/
Le 04/02/2011 10:02, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
On 02/04/2011 08:36 AM, mouss wrote:
Le 03/02/2011 10:24, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent )
Le 04/02/2011 20:42, Joe a écrit :
On 02/04/2011 10:42 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Still, I am (well, WAS) disappointed that Postfix 2.3.3 is what
installs on CentOS 5.5 by default. But Postfix 2.8 wasn't that hard to
compile. :)
I always try to work with the package management system to
Am 04.02.2011 23:54, schrieb Gary Smith:
This is somewhat off topic to the postfix list, but relevant to the community.
I have a client who sends about 600mgs/week total from their SBS server
through our email relays. The relay IP has a positive reputation and isn't
flagged for spam on any
Am 05.02.2011 00:13, schrieb mouss:
Le 04/02/2011 20:42, Joe a écrit :
On 02/04/2011 10:42 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
Still, I am (well, WAS) disappointed that Postfix 2.3.3 is what
installs on CentOS 5.5 by default. But Postfix 2.8 wasn't that hard to
compile. :)
I always try to work with
On 02/04/2011 03:13 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 04/02/2011 20:42, Joe a écrit :
I always try to work with the package management system to keep things
sane and manageable if possible. postfix-2.7 and 2.8 rpms and srpms are
available for centos from several sources. It's pretty easy to replace
the
Le vendredi 04 février 2011 à 14:48 -0500, Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:31:31PM +0100, David Touzeau wrote:
Is it supported to set parameters in command line directly in master cf
eg ?
No.
Not the parameters you showed, they are queue-manager
Le 05/02/2011 00:34, Joe a écrit :
On 02/04/2011 03:13 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 04/02/2011 20:42, Joe a écrit :
I always try to work with the package management system to keep things
sane and manageable if possible. postfix-2.7 and 2.8 rpms and srpms are
available for centos from several sources.
Le 04/02/2011 23:54, Gary Smith a écrit :
This is somewhat off topic to the postfix list, but relevant to the community.
I have a client who sends about 600mgs/week total from their SBS server
through our email relays. The relay IP has a positive reputation and isn't
flagged for spam on
56 matches
Mail list logo
