Am 05.02.2011 00:13, schrieb mouss: > Le 04/02/2011 20:42, Joe a écrit : >> On 02/04/2011 10:42 AM, Steve Jenkins wrote: >>> >>> Still, I am (well, WAS) disappointed that Postfix 2.3.3 is what >>> installs on CentOS 5.5 by default. But Postfix 2.8 wasn't that hard to >>> compile. :) >>> >> >> I always try to work with the package management system to keep things >> sane and manageable if possible. postfix-2.7 and 2.8 rpms and srpms are >> available for centos from several sources. It's pretty easy to replace >> the ancient postfix package with a fairly up to date one, and it's one >> of the first things I'd do after a centos or rhel install. >> >> I see that rhel 6 comes with postfix-2.6.6 which is better, but still a >> bit conservative. Not all of the rhel/centos packages are out of date, >> but they do seem quite sluggish about making any MTA changes. >> >> FWIW debian/ubuntu seem to be much more current on the versions of >> postfix they ship, but even then it's not a bad idea to install a more >> recent package than what they ship with. >> >> Joe > > guys, we at the bsd balcony find it funny to see linuxers fighting each > other with "my distro is better" and "I can compile faster than you", > and more funnily "I was born to destroy bill gates empire". > > but all this is off topic here.
so bsd is the answer to all universe questions? *g -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
