Re: transport not triggered

2011-05-26 Thread houmles
You were right. I add this vacation domain to mydestination and change the logic to test#domain@autoreply.domain.org and everything works now :) Thank you very much.. On 05/26/11 00:04, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 05/25/2011 11:13 PM, houmles wrote: I have virtual_alias_domains=$transport_ma

Re: transport not triggered

2011-05-26 Thread houmles
Thanks for the tip. I will think about that :) On 05/26/11 00:15, Noel Jones wrote: On 5/25/2011 4:13 PM, houmles wrote: I have virtual_alias_domains=$transport_maps so it should be there. What a terrible idea. What happens when you (or someone else) decides to add yahoo.com or hotmail.com

Relocated translation

2011-05-26 Thread Frank Bonnet
Hello I am facing a unsual problem. One of our users is dead after commiting a suicide because he was implicated in a financials "troubles" ... In such case the French law tells us we have to close his mailbox and keep it safely for an eventual police investigation. I have configure the reloca

Re: Relocated translation

2011-05-26 Thread Wietse Venema
Frank Bonnet: > Hello > > I am facing a unsual problem. > > One of our users is dead after commiting a suicide because > he was implicated in a financials "troubles" ... > > In such case the French law tells us we have to close his mailbox > and keep it safely for an eventual police investigatio

Re: Relocated translation

2011-05-26 Thread Frank Bonnet
On 05/26/2011 11:15 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Frank Bonnet: Hello I am facing a unsual problem. One of our users is dead after commiting a suicide because he was implicated in a financials "troubles" ... In such case the French law tells us we have to close his mailbox and keep it safely for a

Bad recipient address syntax

2011-05-26 Thread İhsan Doğan
Hi, I've got the issue, that the "-" character in an e-mail address is not accepted by Postfix. Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail.opencsw.org ESMTP Postfix HELO localhost 250 mail.opencsw.org MAIL FROM: 250 2.1.0 Ok RCPT TO: <-hanswur...@dogan.ch> 501 5.1.3 Bad recipi

Re: Bad recipient address syntax

2011-05-26 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2011-05-26 ??hsan Do??an wrote: > I've got the issue, that the "-" character in an e-mail address is > not accepted by Postfix. [...] > What is the reason, that Postfix is not accepting "-" as the first > character in an e-mail address? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#allow_min_user Reg

Re: Bad recipient address syntax

2011-05-26 Thread İhsan Doğan
Hello Ansgar On 05/26/11 12:51 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: I've got the issue, that the "-" character in an e-mail address is not accepted by Postfix. [...] What is the reason, that Postfix is not accepting "-" as the first character in an e-mail address? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.ht

Re: Another open source anti spam framework

2011-05-26 Thread Thomas Berger
Hi Ulrich, after a bit of reading on the project site, there is one thing, i see a little bit critical: On the "about" page there is a "Simple Setup" example. In this you describe: - Postfix accepts and receives (or rejects) the mail and delivers it to the Detective. - The Detective might rej

Re: Relocated translation

2011-05-26 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:22:55AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: >> /etc/postfix/transport: >> u...@example.com error:5.1.1 your message here >> >> Wietse > OK, thank you Wietse. Note, SMTP replies are ASCII. All the characters in the reply must be 7-bit ASCII characters. You need to avoi

Re: Relocated translation

2011-05-26 Thread Frank Bonnet
On 05/26/2011 03:34 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:22:55AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: /etc/postfix/transport: u...@example.com error:5.1.1 your message here Wietse OK, thank you Wietse. Note, SMTP replies are ASCII. All the characters in the reply must b

Re: Relocated translation

2011-05-26 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: > On 05/26/2011 03:34 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:22:55AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: >> /etc/postfix/transport: u...@example.com error:5.1.1 your message here Wietse >>> OK, tha

Re: Relocated translation

2011-05-26 Thread Frank Bonnet
The transport maps solution Fit perfectly Thanks for your answer Viktor Envoyé de mon iPhone Le 26 mai 2011 à 17:31, Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: > >> On 05/26/2011 03:34 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: >>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:22

Mail forwarding

2011-05-26 Thread pch0317
Hi, I want to forward mail only for one user u...@mydomain.tld to u...@otherdomain.tld. I try do it in this way: /etc/postfix/virtual: ... u...@mydomain.tld u...@mydomain.tld, u...@otherdomain.tld ... When I send mail to u...@mydomain.tld it receive message but user u...@otherdomain.tld

different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Stephen Ingram
I'm using postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5.3 and have experienced differing results depending on how I have postfix lookup the virtual domains hosted by postfix. First, for virtual_alias_domains lookup: postmap -q 4test.net hash:/etc/postfix/domains postmap -q 4test.net ldap:/etc/postfix/domains both y

Re: different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:05:47PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > I'm using postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5.3 and have experienced differing > results depending on how I have postfix lookup the virtual domains > hosted by postfix. > > First, for virtual_alias_domains lookup: > > postmap -q 4test.net h

Re: different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:05:47PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > >> I'm using postfix 2.3.3 on CentOS 5.3 and have experienced differing >> results depending on how I have postfix lookup the virtual domains >> hosted by postfix. >> >> Firs

Re: different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:27:24PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > >> I receive an error "User unknown in virtual alias table" > >> and the mail is bounced. > > > > Likely the LDAP table incorrectly returns results that don't depend > > on the lookup key, or for additional unintended lookup keys. >

Re: Mail forwarding

2011-05-26 Thread mouss
Le 26/05/2011 18:41, pch0317 a écrit : > Hi, > I want to forward mail only for one user u...@mydomain.tld to > u...@otherdomain.tld. > > I try do it in this way: > /etc/postfix/virtual: > ... > u...@mydomain.tld u...@mydomain.tld, u...@otherdomain.tld > ... > > When I send mail to u...@mydo

Re: Relocated translation

2011-05-26 Thread mouss
Le 26/05/2011 17:31, Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: > >> On 05/26/2011 03:34 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: >>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:22:55AM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote: >>> > /etc/postfix/transport: > u...@example.com error:

Re: different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:27:24PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > >> >> I receive an error "User unknown in virtual alias table" >> >> and the mail is bounced. >> > >> > Likely the LDAP table incorrectly returns results that don't depend >>

Re: different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:14:20PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > 4test.net 4test.net > > thinking that the right side doesn't matter. Postfix is just looking > for the presence of the domain, no? > > For the ldap lookup, postfix is looking for 4test.net for which the > query results in the

Re: Another open source anti spam framework

2011-05-26 Thread Ulrich Kautz
Hello Thomas Thanks for your feedback. > after a bit of reading on the project site, there is one thing, i see a > little bit critical: > > On the "about" page there is a "Simple Setup" example. In this you describe: > - Postfix accepts and receives (or rejects) the mail and delivers it to the

Re: Another open source anti spam framework

2011-05-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 26.05.2011 23:28, schrieb Ulrich Kautz: > Hello Thomas > > Thanks for your feedback. > >> after a bit of reading on the project site, there is one thing, i see a >> little bit critical: >> >> On the "about" page there is a "Simple Setup" example. In this you describe: >> - Postfix accepts a

Join my network on LinkedIn

2011-05-26 Thread Yessica De Ascencao via LinkedIn
LinkedIn Yessica De Ascencao requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: -- I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. Accept invitation from Yessica De Ascencao http://www.linkedin.com/e/ekybff-go68qc0k-u/qB3B

Re: Join my network on LinkedIn

2011-05-26 Thread Reindl Harald
can somebody please remove the idiots from LinkedIn from mailing-lists? Am 26.05.2011 23:54, schrieb Yessica De Ascencao via LinkedIn: > > LinkedIn > > Yessica De Ascencao requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: > > I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. > >

Re: Join my network on LinkedIn

2011-05-26 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 05/26/2011 11:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: can somebody please remove the idiots from LinkedIn from mailing-lists? s/from LinkedIn// -- J.

Re: Join my network on LinkedIn

2011-05-26 Thread ml
On Fri, 27 May 2011 00:03:26 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 05/26/2011 11:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: can somebody please remove the idiots from LinkedIn from mailing-lists? s/from LinkedIn// go back home new guy -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 gpg --keys

Re: Another open source anti spam framework

2011-05-26 Thread Ulrich Kautz
Hello Reindl >>> after a bit of reading on the project site, there is one thing, i see a >>> little bit critical: >>> >>> On the "about" page there is a "Simple Setup" example. In this you describe: >>> - Postfix accepts and receives (or rejects) the mail and delivers it to >>> the Detective. >

Re: Another open source anti spam framework

2011-05-26 Thread Blake Hudson
>> Ok, that was not lucid, i agree. I clarified this on the about page, >> respectively left it the reject-part out to prevent misunderstandings. >> However, the Detective server actually can bounce the mail, if he is >> configured to do so in the spam.handle directive. There are four different

Re: Another open source anti spam framework

2011-05-26 Thread Ulrich Kautz
Hello Blake > >>> Ok, that was not lucid, i agree. I clarified this on the about page, >>> respectively left it the reject-part out to prevent misunderstandings. >>> However, the Detective server actually can bounce the mail, if he is >>> configured to do so in the spam.handle directive. There

Re: different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 02:14:20PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > >> 4test.net     4test.net >> >> thinking that the right side doesn't matter. Postfix is just looking >> for the presence of the domain, no? >> >> For the ldap lookup, postfi

Re: different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:19:56PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > Agreed. Here is the postfix log for when the ldap table is used: > > May 26 14:48:46 smtp postfix/smtpd[5653]: E8EB7CC056A: > client=terrapin.penumbra.us[192.168.17.42] > May 26 14:48:59 smtp postfix/cleanup[5663]: E8EB7CC056A: > m

Re: different results using hash vs ldap for virtual domain lookup

2011-05-26 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:19:56PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > >> Agreed. Here is the postfix log for when the ldap table is used: >> >> May 26 14:48:46 smtp postfix/smtpd[5653]: E8EB7CC056A: >> client=terrapin.penumbra.us[192.168.17.42]

override HOME on .forward | command

2011-05-26 Thread Gary Duncan
How override $HOME when postfix invokes .forward specified commands as the user?