Hi All,
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing issue
with getting black listed again and again.
Currently we have setup reverse lookup, DKIIM and SPF to avoid getting
listed into rbl's and dnsbl.
Regards,
Dhanraj Wadhe
Am 04.10.2011 08:55, schrieb Dhanraj Wadhe:
Hi All,
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing
issue with getting black listed again and again.
Currently we have setup reverse lookup, DKIIM and SPF to avoid getting
listed into rbl's and dnsbl.
that has no
Zitat von Dhanraj Wadhe dhanraj.wa...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing issue
with getting black listed again and again.
Currently we have setup reverse lookup, DKIIM and SPF to avoid getting
listed into rbl's and dnsbl.
In most cases the
On 2011-10-04 2:55 AM, Dhanraj Wadhe dhanraj.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing
issue with getting black listed again and again.
Evidence?
Currently we have setup reverse lookup, DKIIM and SPF to avoid getting
listed into rbl's and
Dhanraj Wadhe:
Hi All,
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing issue
with getting black listed again and again.
There are many reasons why this can happen:
- Users forward all their email, and therefore they also forward spam.
- Users are phished and spammers
I'm getting a huge amount of Server configuration problem rejects. But not all
-- I receive from my own nets and some lists. postfix check says I'm OK (I
don't know if it checks the configuration(s)), and postfix restarts without
complaint.
root@server:/etc/postfix# postconf -n
On 10/4/2011 9:54 AM, Glenn English wrote:
I'm getting a huge amount of Server configuration problem rejects. But not
all -- I receive from my own nets and some lists. postfix check says I'm OK
(I don't know if it checks the configuration(s)), and postfix restarts
without complaint.
Hello Wietse.
Thank you for the help.
I found the problem to be in my dovecot config file.
Now it is working as expected.
Thanks.
Markus
On 09/19/2011 11:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Markus Bajones:
Hello Wietse,
thank you for your reply.
I tried to do this, but failed to get any result.
Hello,
I am building a Postfix 2.8.5 server. And I am delivering my mail only
to the Dovecot IMAP mail store using LMTP.
I am following the Wiki pages at www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html and
http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html for guidance in these things.
In the testing of LMTP delivery I
DO NOT post verbose logging unless required!
Am 04.10.2011 18:05, schrieb terryjames9...@mm.st:
Hello,
I am building a Postfix 2.8.5 server. And I am delivering my mail only
to the Dovecot IMAP mail store using LMTP.
I am following the Wiki pages at www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html and
Do not quote the entire message with verbose logs unless required! :)
DO NOT post verbose logging unless required!
terryjames9...@mm.st:
Oct 4 08:26:17 tjserver postfix/lmtp[7150]: 086E9204BE:
to=tju...@tjserver.loc, relay=tjserver.loc[private/dovecot-lmtp],
delay=0.13, delays=0.11/0.02/0/0, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (host
tjserver.loc[private/dovecot-lmtp] said: 451 4.3.0 tju...@tjserver.loc
Temporary
On Oct 4, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
Look in the log for more information.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Thanks, Noel. There were about 99 million:
server postfix/smtpd[17681]: warning: problem talking to server
127.0.0.1:6: Connection refused
entries.
On 10/4/2011 11:06 AM, Glenn English wrote:
On Oct 4, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
Look in the log for more information.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Thanks, Noel. There were about 99 million:
server postfix/smtpd[17681]: warning: problem talking to server
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:05 PM, terryjames9...@mm.st wrote:
Hello,
I am building a Postfix 2.8.5 server. And I am delivering my mail only
to the Dovecot IMAP mail store using LMTP.
I am following the Wiki pages at www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html and
http://www.postfix.org/lmtp.8.html
I have not made any blame. I am asking a question to learn. So nothing
needed to accuse.
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 12:29 PM, Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
terryjames9...@mm.st:
Oct 4 08:26:17 tjserver postfix/lmtp[7150]: 086E9204BE:
to=tju...@tjserver.loc,
Hello Duane,
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 4:33 PM, Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com
wrote:
You should look here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP
Thank you for the link. I think I already have tried to follow it to set
up these servers.
May be I have missed then something in
On Oct 4, 2011, at 5:38 PM, terryjames9...@mm.st wrote:
Hello Duane,
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 4:33 PM, Duane Hill duih...@gmail.com
wrote:
You should look here: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP
Thank you for the link. I think I already have tried to follow it to set
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:45 PM, Helder Oliveira
helder.olive...@byside.com wrote:
Shooting the messenger is very common, learn and let it go
I do not understand why you accuse of shooting anything. I have not
made any blame. There is wrong reaction to my just asking a first
question.
On Oct 4, 2011, at 5:48 PM, terryjames9...@mm.st wrote:
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:45 PM, Helder Oliveira
helder.olive...@byside.com wrote:
Shooting the messenger is very common, learn and let it go
I do not understand why you accuse of shooting anything. I have not
made any
I am not the one that is calling the 'blame' and 'shooting' and
'overreacting'. Its other persons that are saying that of me.
That is what is rude not asking question honestly!
Okay then, so it is my failing that I am less skilled at this Postfix
than you. Enjoy the money and time I did spend
On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
That's postgrey. It's running, but bears looking into...
connection refused suggests it's either not running or not the right
port.
Postgrey wasn't running -- I misinterpreted ps. I put it in monit to be
restarted if it ever quits again.
Hello,
My postfix installation is having trouble accepting email from a
particular source to any recipients and I haven't been able to ascertain
the cause so I can address the problem. Here's a logfile extraction:
Oct 4 11:53:52 postal1 postfix/smtpd[19496]: connect from
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Dhanraj Wadhe dhanraj.wa...@gmail.com wrote:
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing issue
with getting black listed again and again.
Currently we have setup reverse lookup, DKIIM and SPF to avoid getting
listed into rbl's and
* Eric Cunningham e...@whoi.edu:
Hello,
My postfix installation is having trouble accepting email from a
particular source to any recipients and I haven't been able to
ascertain the cause so I can address the problem. Here's a logfile
extraction:
It honors you that you're trying to find
On 2011-10-04 21:02, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
It could be pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
Given that pcre: is involved, lot's of funky stuff could happen.
Try and run
postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
Hope this helps,
wolfgang
Eric Cunningham:
Oct 4 11:53:53 postal1 postfix/smtpd[19496]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
fwall.fidcouns.com[207.109.19.34]: 554 5.7.1 e...@whoi.edu: Recipient
address rejected: Access denied; from=s...@fidcouns.com
to=e...@whoi.edu proto=ESMTP helo=STPAUL.FIDCOUNS.COM
This means that the
postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu' pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
Great suggestion for this, unfortunately, it returns nothing:
# postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu' pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_sender_access
#
-Eric
On 10/4/2011 2:36 PM, Eric Cunningham wrote:
postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
Great suggestion for this, unfortunately, it returns nothing:
# postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_sender_access
#
-Eric
why are you
* wolfgang mewo...@gmx.net:
On 2011-10-04 21:02, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
It could be pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
Given that pcre: is involved, lot's of funky stuff could happen.
Try and run
postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
On 2011-10-04 21:36, Eric Cunningham wrote:
postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
Great suggestion for this, unfortunately, it returns nothing:
# postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_sender_access #
Use
On 10/4/2011 4:19 PM, wolfgang wrote:
On 2011-10-04 21:36, Eric Cunningham wrote:
postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
Great suggestion for this, unfortunately, it returns nothing:
# postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_sender_access
On 10/4/2011 5:42 PM, Eric Cunningham wrote:
On 10/4/2011 4:19 PM, wolfgang wrote:
On 2011-10-04 21:36, Eric Cunningham wrote:
postmap -q 'e...@whoi.edu'
pcre:/etc/postfix/access/final_recipient_access
Great suggestion for this, unfortunately, it returns nothing:
# postmap -q
The TLS ciphers I use for transport between a number of our servers are
limited to
openssl ciphers -v RSA:\!MEDIUM:\!LOW:\!EXPORT:\!NULL -tls1 -ssl3
AES256-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AES(256)
Mac=SHA1
CAMELLIA256-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=Camellia(256)
mephistophe...@operamail.com:
smtpd_tls_ciphers = RSA
As documented, smtpd_tls_ciphers specifies a cipher GRADE
not a cipher NAME.
TLS_README suggests that the grades are export and high.
Wietse
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_tls_ciphers
Hi,
Is there a way to limit the number of recipients per message based on
the sender email address ?
Thanks,
With Best Regards,
Janaka
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 12:25 +0530, Dhanraj Wadhe wrote:
Hi All,
We are public email provider with postfix at backend. We are facing
issue with getting black listed again and again.
Blacklisted where ? by whom ?
Usually If you get listed in any common blacklist you will get evidence
why
37 matches
Mail list logo
