Hi All,
We are currently migrating all our customers accounts to ldap to make
it simpler as currently they are all over
the place. Our current Postfix installation is using MySQL for virtual
accounts and delivery is done with dovecot
and it works great and provides the ability to alias
Dear list,
I installed some time ago dspam and integrated it into postfix.
The order was
postfix - amavisd with reinject into postfix - dspam with reinject
into postfix.
But dspam crashed and I removed dspam again to get mail traffic up.
My problem is now that some mails are queued and I cannot
remove
___
SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192
I do know that a change in *.db and *.cdb files is picked up
immediately, simply by the affected daemon dying and opening the
new file upon startup.
So far, so good.
But why is that not done for pcre, regexp and cidr files?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Hi everybody,
Is it possible to somehow limit smtpd_sender_restrictions only to
outgoing mail?
I want to use check_sender_access on my outgoing mail so that in MAIL
FROM only addresses from my list of emails are allowed. I guess that
one (ugly) way to solve this is to have 2 Postfix servers so
Hi All,
Thanks for your suggestions, have got unlisted from rbl's as of now. I am
using Cisco Iron-port as Mail Gateway so outgoing mails are scanned by
Iron-port.
We have done some FBL sign-up also.
Regards,
Dhanraj Wadhe
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Ramprasad r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
On 5/10/2011 10:23 πμ, Shane Chrisp wrote:
no problems, but I am having trouble working out how I will be able to
add domain to domain aliases and also catchall
accounts for domains. Personally I hate catchall accounts for domains,
but some customers just have to have them, or
...
using the
I have a question regarding the Bounce-never mail sink regexp:
postconf(5) gives this example:
/^(RCPT\s+TO:.*?)\bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)/ $1 NOTIFY=NEVER $2
Isn't there a '' missing before the '?'. As I understand it the '?' makes the
preceeding character optional e.g. example.com and
Ralf Hildebrandt:
I do know that a change in *.db and *.cdb files is picked up
immediately, simply by the affected daemon dying and opening the
new file upon startup.
These files are not read into memory, so they must be kept open.
So far, so good.
But why is that not done for pcre,
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I have a question regarding the Bounce-never mail sink regexp:
postconf(5) gives this example:
/^(RCPT\s+TO:.*?)\bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)/ $1 NOTIFY=NEVER $2
Isn't there a '' missing before the '?'. As I understand it the '?' makes the
preceeding character
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I have a question regarding the Bounce-never mail sink regexp:
postconf(5) gives this example:
/^(RCPT\s+TO:.*?)\bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)/ $1 NOTIFY=NEVER $2
Isn't there a '' missing before the '?'. As I understand it
On 10/5/2011 4:01 AM, Matthias Fechner wrote:
But dspam crashed and I removed dspam again to get mail traffic up.
My problem is now that some mails are queued and I cannot resend them
because it seems that postfix want to use a content filter I alread
disabled.
The old line in master.cf was:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Patrick Ben Koetter:
I have a question regarding the Bounce-never mail sink regexp:
postconf(5) gives this example:
/^(RCPT\s+TO:.*?)\bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)/ $1 NOTIFY=NEVER $2
Isn't there a '' missing before
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
The ? does not do what you guys are thinking. The .*? turns on
lazy matching. Without this, .* would also match \bNOTIFY=\S+\b(.*)
and that is not what we want.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#Lazy_quantification
Obviously, it's time
On 5/10/2011 3:17 μμ, Shane Chrisp wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thank you very much for your reply. From that setuo I can see how to
setup a catchall with a minor change to our current setup.
The domain to domain alias is a way of saying that we have a real
domain of dom1.tld and another domain od
On Wednesday 05 October 2011 00:03:30 Janaka Wickramasinghe wrote:
Is there a way to limit the number of recipients per message
based on the sender email address ?
This would require an external policy service acting on sender and
recipient_count attributes. I'm not sure if any of the existing
/dev/rob0:
On Wednesday 05 October 2011 00:03:30 Janaka Wickramasinghe wrote:
Is there a way to limit the number of recipients per message
based on the sender email address ?
This would require an external policy service acting on sender and
recipient_count attributes. I'm not sure if
Hi Brian,
Am 05.10.2011 14:48, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
If you remove a content filter without draining the queue, you need to
re-queue all messages using 'postsuper -r ALL'
great thanks a lot, that is what I searched for.
Best regards,
Matthias
--
Programming today is a race
On 05/10/11 21:41, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I have no answer to this problem, I am afraid.
First, according to http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html, you could
add for such a domain (e.g. aliased.example.com) an LDAP entry with
mailacceptinggeneralid = aliased.example.com (no maildrop needed).
My Postfix delivers to an IMAP store using LMTP.
I intend to have known users only defined in IMAP server's LMTP config.
To check for valid users, and reject if not found, I use Postfix's
(http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html)
reject_sender_login_mismatch
For simple config, I add that to
Thanks for the quick replies. postfwd seems to be having the feature.
Great...
Cheers,
Janaka
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
/dev/rob0:
On Wednesday 05 October 2011 00:03:30 Janaka Wickramasinghe wrote:
Is there a way to limit the number of
We have been having some trouble with Temporary lookup failures from ldap
lookup timeouts and I have been trying to find ways to solve the problem.
One thing I would like to do is cut down on the volume of lookups by
skipping virtual alias lookups if the mail is being relayed from another of
our
On 10/5/2011 5:00 AM, Aleksandar Vukovic wrote:
Hi everybody,
Is it possible to somehow limit smtpd_sender_restrictions only to
outgoing mail?
I want to use check_sender_access on my outgoing mail so that in MAIL
FROM only addresses from my list of emails are allowed. I guess that
one
On 10/5/2011 2:20 PM, John Baker wrote:
We have been having some trouble with Temporary lookup failures from
ldap lookup timeouts and I have been trying to find ways to solve
the problem. One thing I would like to do is cut down on the volume
of lookups by skipping virtual alias lookups if the
Our postfix server acts as a spam server for a number of domains and is
designed to forward email to the final destination; it has not been setup as a
local mail server.
Every once in a while, it will attempt to send an email to
root@NT-SPAM01.adetor-lan.InternalDomain.local and will be
On 10/5/2011 3:03 PM, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
Our postfix server acts as a spam server for a number of domains and is
designed to forward email to the final destination; it has not been setup as
a local mail server.
Every once in a while, it will attempt to send an email to
On 5/10/2011 10:20 μμ, John Baker wrote:
We have been having some trouble with Temporary lookup failures from
ldap lookup timeouts and I have been trying to find ways to solve the
problem. One thing I would like to do is cut down on the volume of
lookups by skipping virtual alias lookups if
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:00:40PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
mephistophe...@operamail.com:
smtpd_tls_ciphers = RSA
As documented, smtpd_tls_ciphers specifies a cipher GRADE
not a cipher NAME.
TLS_README suggests that the grades are export and high.
Well the full list of grades is:
Well the full list of grades is:
Thanks. I finally found the GRADE's (default), editable cipherlists on
lmtp(8):
tls_high_cipherlist (ALL:!EXPORT:!LOW:!MEDIUM:+RC4:@STRENGTH)
tls_medium_cipherlist (ALL:!EXPORT:!LOW:+RC4:@STRENGTH)
tls_low_cipherlist(ALL:!EXPORT:+RC4:@STRENGTH)
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:28:40PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
Running Postfix 2.8.2
When I telnet smtp0.lightlink.com 25, and type 'help',
it says unknown command.
Thanks in advance for pointers to RTFM.
Homer Smith
Lightlink Internet
For help with SMTP
I am getting the following message/errors
Oct 5 00:00:10 myhost postfix/qmgr[18862]: 125BC2400A7:
from=john@xyz.tld, size=2760, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Oct 5 00:00:10 myhost postfix/smtp[28713]: 125BC2400A7: enabling PIX
workarounds: disable_esmtp delay_dotcrlf for
On 10/5/2011 6:23 PM, John Allen wrote:
I am getting the following message/errors
Oct 5 00:00:10 myhost postfix/qmgr[18862]: 125BC2400A7:
from=john@xyz.tld, size=2760, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Oct 5 00:00:10 myhost postfix/smtp[28713]: 125BC2400A7: enabling
PIX workarounds:
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:28:40PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
Running Postfix 2.8.2
When I telnet smtp0.lightlink.com 25, and type 'help',
it says unknown command.
Thanks in advance for pointers to RTFM.
Homer Smith
Lightlink Internet
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:06:41 AM Miles Fidelman wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:28:40PM -0400, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
Running Postfix 2.8.2
When I telnet smtp0.lightlink.com 25, and type 'help',
it says unknown command.
On 06/10/2011 05:06, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Last time I looked (just now), RFC5321 stated:
SMTP servers SHOULD support HELP without arguments and MAY support it
with arguments.
Not implemented, yes, and Postfix properly responds with a 502 response
code. Arguably not all that useful when
35 matches
Mail list logo
