>> No other people have systems for doing this?
>
> we are using http://dbmail.org/ behind postfix and a replication-slave
> if you have only one server you can setup a slave on a different port
> as 3306 on 127.0.0.1
>
> benefit of the slave is that you can stop it at any time, make a
> copy o
Does anyone have any low-end/low-budget backup
suggestions for user mail
spools? Consider hobby type scenarios or small businesses
with a cheap single
hard drive rented (dedicated/shared) server where there may
not be budget for
another server or paid ba
On 12/2/11 8:23 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On 12/2/11 2:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Philip Prindeville:
>>> Would it make sense to add a parameter of additional gid's that
>>> you want smtpd to retain?
>>
>> Perhaps you can use a class "inet" socket on 127.0.0.1. That
>> will have less impa
On 12/2/11 2:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Philip Prindeville:
>> Would it make sense to add a parameter of additional gid's that
>> you want smtpd to retain?
>
> Perhaps you can use a class "inet" socket on 127.0.0.1. That
> will have less impact on the Postfix security architecture.
> With 64k p
Le Fri 2/12/2011, Ken D'Ambrosio disait
> Hey, all. I've got a primary -- my actual destination/IMAP server -- and, for
> various reasons, a secondary SMTP server. My primary only rejects mail to
> invalid recipients (spam is dealt with internally). I'd like my secondary to
> reject invalid rec
Am 02.12.2011 23:02, schrieb Ken D'Ambrosio:
> Hey, all. I've got a primary -- my actual destination/IMAP server -- and, for
> various reasons, a secondary SMTP server. My primary only rejects mail to
> invalid recipients (spam is dealt with internally). I'd like my secondary to
> reject invalid
Hey, all. I've got a primary -- my actual destination/IMAP server -- and, for
various reasons, a secondary SMTP server. My primary only rejects mail to
invalid recipients (spam is dealt with internally). I'd like my secondary to
reject invalid recipients, also. I can bring over /etc/aliases and
Philip Prindeville:
> Would it make sense to add a parameter of additional gid's that
> you want smtpd to retain?
Perhaps you can use a class "inet" socket on 127.0.0.1. That
will have less impact on the Postfix security architecture.
With 64k ports, you won't run out of them quickly.
Wie
I tried to set up Postfix (2.6.6) on a Centos6 system (yes, I've filed a bug
for them to bump to something 2.8.x-ish)... as:
Dec 1 20:26:05 localhost postfix/smtpd[7743]: warning: connect to Milter
service unix:/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock: Permission denied
# ls -ld /var/spool/MIMEDe
Am 02.12.2011 21:15, schrieb Steve Fatula:
> *From:* Wietse Venema
> *To:* postfix-users@postfix.org
> *Sent:* Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM
> *Subject:* OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
> To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword trends) s
From: Wietse Venema
>To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>Sent: Friday, December 2, 2011 8:42 AM
>Subject: OT: Yahoo spam load (was: Dead Destination configuration)
>
>To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword trends) see
>http://visualize.yahoo.com/ and click the green buttons.
>
>
>I wish th
Mark Goodge:
> > I've seen no evidence that this interpretation is correct. On what
> > basis do you assert that this is Yahoo's policy?
>
> Experience, mostly. I've found that ceasing retry attempts for four
> hours, then restarting, typically results in the queue clearing as fast
> as you can
On 02/12/2011 14:35, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:23:53PM +, Mark Goodge wrote:
That makes no sense at all, surely nothing more productive will happen
when the spiggot is turned on 4 hours later with even more mail queued.
The point is that "following instructions" is
To get some idea of Yahoo spam load (and keyword trends) see
http://visualize.yahoo.com/ and click the green buttons.
Wietse
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:23:53PM +, Mark Goodge wrote:
> >That makes no sense at all, surely nothing more productive will happen
> >when the spiggot is turned on 4 hours later with even more mail queued.
>
> The point is that "following instructions" is a reasonable proxy for
> "being a leg
On 02/12/2011 14:15, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:24:29AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
There is no scenario in which a site that accepts your mail (i.e.
has not classified you as a spammer, correctly or not) will offer
better service if all your mail delayed by a few hours,
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:24:29AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > There is no scenario in which a site that accepts your mail (i.e.
> > has not classified you as a spammer, correctly or not) will offer
> > better service if all your mail delayed by a few hours, that just
> > time-warps the proble
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:37:02AM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
>
> > Yes, I am trying some workarounds, like rate delays, to address unusual
> > traffic, and also joined their FBL for complainants. But, am still facing
> > problems with some MTAs.
> > Also, this only for Yahoo, there
Okay. This means I was going in the wrong direction itself.
Thank you guys, for making this clear.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:37:02AM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
>
> > Yes, I am trying some workarounds, like rate delays, to address unusual
> >
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:37:02AM +0530, DN Singh wrote:
> Yes, I am trying some workarounds, like rate delays, to address unusual
> traffic, and also joined their FBL for complainants. But, am still facing
> problems with some MTAs.
> Also, this only for Yahoo, there are others like hotmail, red
DN Singh:
> I will get more clear with an example:
>
> yahoo.com has different rejection codes, common of which is TS01. They say,
> after TS01, you aren't supposed to attempt delivery for 4 hours. But, the
Wietse:
> According to "Yahoo! Postmaster Help Topics", TS01 means:
>
> * We are seeing unu
Am 02.12.2011 07:02, schrieb email builder:
> No other people have systems for doing this?
we are using http://dbmail.org/ behind postfix and a replication-slave
if you have only one server you can setup a slave on a different port
as 3306 on 127.0.0.1
benefit of the slave is that you can stop
22 matches
Mail list logo
