Hi,
I'm having an issue I can't quite understand at the moment.
We are part of a larger PKI infrastructure run by the german NREN, which
is in the end rooted at the Deutsche Telekom.
- Deutsche Telekom Root CA 2
- DFN-Verein PCA Global - G01
- LRZ-CA - G01 -- this is ours
-
Hello,
Recently we start sending lots of emails to hotmail accounts and lots of them
are in the active queue waiting for delivery for long time...
Some of our clients have hotmail accounts for testing and are complaining
about delivery times.
Our server has a good reputation but that is not
Il 19/12/2011 17.41, Wietse Venema ha scritto:
Claudio Prono:
cat 1324286018.V811I1ea270M489235.mail | strace /usr/bin/vacation -t1
testmedia
But no way, no results at all
This will only send a reply if the message has testmedia
in the To: or Cc: header.
Wietse
In fact, this
* Claudio Prono claudio.pr...@atpss.net:
In fact, this is the header of the mail:
Return-Path: clau...@mediaservice.net
X-Original-To: testme...@domain.it
Delivered-To: testme...@domain.it
No To: or CC: header...
I have also tried to specify the alias, like
/usr/bin/vacation -a
Am 20.12.2011 10:24, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Hello,
Any idea how to allow all certificates issued by specific Sub-CAs,
without trusting everyone?
As far as i understand you have to list the complete chain but only your
sub-CA to get it working. So create a smtpd_tls_CAfile with the
hello list
hello geek
hello guru
hello Fu
I have done tests on my smtp server used to dspam.
after problems of housing road I realized that dspam removes Return-Path
header
my emails are then intercepted as spam.
I have not found a solution to my problem
please help me
i use a latest stable
Zitat von Bernhard Schmidt be...@birkenwald.de:
Am 20.12.2011 10:24, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Hello,
Any idea how to allow all certificates issued by specific Sub-CAs,
without trusting everyone?
As far as i understand you have to list the complete chain but only your
sub-CA to get it
Hello Andrew,
thanks for the answer
On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 09:22 +, Helder Oliveira wrote:
Hello,
Recently we start sending lots of emails to hotmail accounts and lots of
them are in the active queue waiting for delivery for long
On the older box, every day I see a message stating that
hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients has changed -- restarting.
This happens when an smtpd(8) notices a table change after processing
a request and just before accepting another. A sufficiently idle
system will not have any mail
Hi,
I'm trying to create a /dev/null mailbox, but didn't get much success
following the recipe at
http://www.serverwatch.com/columns/article.php/3844371/Forwarding-a-Postfix-Virtual-Alias-to-devnull.htm
What I did was following:
- Add a blackhole alias in /etc/aliases (blackhole: /dev/null),
* Roberto Greiner robe...@nead.unesp.br:
I'm trying to create a /dev/null mailbox, but didn't get much
success following the recipe at
http://www.serverwatch.com/columns/article.php/3844371/Forwarding-a-Postfix-Virtual-Alias-to-devnull.htm
What I did was following:
- Add a blackhole alias
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 12:35:40 Roberto Greiner wrote:
I'm trying to create a /dev/null mailbox, but didn't get much
success following the recipe at
http://www.serverwatch.com/columns/article.php/3844371/Forwarding-a
-Postfix-Virtual-Alias-to-devnull.htm
What I did was following:
-
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, /dev/rob0 wrote:
Why do you want to do that? What would be wrong with
rejecting that address?
/dev/null is just the proper repository to recycle bits. We don't want to
run out. =^_^=
In all seriousness, I guess it depends on who you ask. For the original
poster's
On 21/12/11 10:11, Dennis Carr wrote:
In all seriousness, I guess it depends on who you ask. For the original
poster's case, it's going to a noreply address, and I've seen cases
where nore...@foo.bar is simply eaten, more often than not, rather than
rejected. Besides, as far as I'm concerned,
Am 21.12.2011 00:47, schrieb Peter:
On 21/12/11 10:11, Dennis Carr wrote:
In all seriousness, I guess it depends on who you ask. For the original
poster's case, it's going to a noreply address, and I've seen cases
where nore...@foo.bar is simply eaten, more often than not, rather than
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the same as drop the messages, the only difference is on the storage
I am not excusing the sender's actions, I am
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:24:04AM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
As far as I understand you have to list the complete chain but only
your sub-CA to get it working.
This is not the case:
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#server_access
Allow the remote SMTP client request
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:26:39 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
In the scache client, the file descriptor sending operation is
always preceeded and followed by a data read. For this reason we
can't be triggering the same bug that postscreen triggered, but
maybe there is another bug in FreeBSD file
Am 21.12.2011 01:29, schrieb Peter:
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the same as drop the messages, the only difference is on the storage
I am
On 12/20/2011 6:29 PM, Peter wrote:
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the same as drop the messages, the only difference is on the storage
I am not
On 21/12/11 16:01, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
The act of delivery to a mailbox does not guarantee the message will be
read by a human, nor replied to, ever. Thus there is zero practical
difference, from the sender's POV, in this case, between delivering to
/dev/null and to a mailbox whose contents
On 21/12/11 15:19, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.12.2011 01:29, schrieb Peter:
On 21/12/11 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote:
so why does he not use the reply-button and what is he thinking does
nore...@mail.tld mean? if you do not read the noreply-address it
is the same as drop the messages, the
Hi
Is there a way to restrict the From field for messages sent with the
command line tool mail?
For messages sent with SMTP we can simply do this:
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_sasl_authz_envelope
and it works fine, but users can execute:
mail t...@test.test -a 'From:
23 matches
Mail list logo
