On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Barbara M. wrote:
I read the already suggested:
http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-
from-source/
My current situation is:
- Old server CentOS 4.x based (Postfix 2.2)
I want to migrate to a new CentOS 6.x (Postfix 2.6)
My plan is
Dear List,
Is there any performance related or other concerns if I try to send mail to
a group containing thousands of users (say 8000) using the alias map? In
case we want to use alias map for this, then which type of db we should use?
With regards,
Goutam
On 12/29/2011 7:12 PM, Helder Oliveira wrote:
> Ralf, those numbers are per hour ? Or Per day ?
It's pretty clear they are per day. Note the question asked "in a
single day". Then see Ralf's answer contains dates/days: 22nd - 28th
> On Dec 29, 2011, at 7:10 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> So
I am implementing SPF one some domains that were without.
Already looking at DKIM, making some tests and will implement soon…
And getting to the next steps…
Ralf, those numbers are per hour ? Or Per day ?
At this moment i can send around 2k emails to hotmail per hour with a score of
65 in retur
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Barbara M. wrote:
My plan is to update Postfix (and dovecot, procmail), in the old box to the
release in the new box and when tested, move user/data to the new box (new
box is 64 bit while old box is 32 bit, but hope this isn't a problem).
Copying the old /etc/postfix dir t
* DN Singh :
> So Ralf, with a score of 99 with ReturnPath, what is the maximum delivery
> that you have got to hotmail in a single day?
on mail.python.org for the last week:
2554 28th
3764 27th
3445 26th
3011 25th
2263 24th
3557 23rd
4279 22nd
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abtei
I read the already suggested:
http://stevejenkins.com/blog/2011/01/building-postfix-2-8-on-rhel5-centos-5-
from-source/
My current situation is:
- Old server CentOS 4.x based (Postfix 2.2)
I want to migrate to a new CentOS 6.x (Postfix 2.6)
My plan is to update Postfix (and dovecot, procmail)
On Thursday 29 December 2011 08:15:40 Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> I am using postfix, amavisd-new, spam assassin, clamav on a
> gateway system.
>
> A short question (I know it's a bit off-topic but I know that
> people here run similar systems):
>
> I've read how to release and/or forward quarantined
Ask, not all..
On Dec 29, 2011 9:28 AM, "Simon Brereton"
wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2011 9:15 AM, "Nikolaos Milas" wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using postfix, amavisd-new, spam assassin, clamav on a gateway
> system.
> >
> > A short question (I know it's a bit off-topic but I know that people
>
On Dec 29, 2011 9:15 AM, "Nikolaos Milas" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using postfix, amavisd-new, spam assassin, clamav on a gateway
system.
>
> A short question (I know it's a bit off-topic but I know that people here
run similar systems):
>
> I've read how to release and/or forward quarantined ma
On 12/29/11 3:15 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Hello,
I am using postfix, amavisd-new, spam assassin, clamav on a gateway
system.
A short question (I know it's a bit off-topic but I know that people
here run similar systems):
I've read how to release and/or forward quarantined mail. But can I
Mark Martinec:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > I do not believe Mark should have to jump through extra hoops, or that
> > you should revert the change. This is a FreeBSD port-specific problem
> > created by me that I will address as soon as I can.
>
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Considering the short
Hello,
I am using postfix, amavisd-new, spam assassin, clamav on a gateway system.
A short question (I know it's a bit off-topic but I know that people
here run similar systems):
I've read how to release and/or forward quarantined mail. But can I read
the quarantined mails in situ (i.e. in t
> But that does not explain why there was no delivery attempt made on
the
> low MX.
After disabling my transport rule for that domain and stopping/starting
postfix it now tries to deliver the mail to both MX.
Now only the guys at netnames.net need to fix their servers...
Regards,
Thomas
> look at your logs
I did that (before posting).
> it was first tried on low mx
There was no delivery attempt made on the low MX.
> then fallback to higher one
All attempts where made against the high MX.
> unless you havent configured another mailrouting
> by transport etc
Now I configured
On 12/29/2011 01:00 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 12/29/2011 5:23 AM, Thomas Bange wrote:
Hi,
I have a mail stuck in my mail queue. The Mail should be delivered to
some.u...@some-domain.de.
Looking up MX records for the domain gives me:
# host -t mx some-domain.de
some-domain.de mail is handled
On 12/29/2011 5:23 AM, Thomas Bange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a mail stuck in my mail queue. The Mail should be delivered to
> some.u...@some-domain.de.
>
> Looking up MX records for the domain gives me:
>
> # host -t mx some-domain.de
> some-domain.de mail is handled by 100 relay2.netnames.net.
>
Am 29.12.2011 12:23, schrieb Thomas Bange:
> Hi,
>
> I have a mail stuck in my mail queue. The Mail should be delivered to
> some.u...@some-domain.de.
>
> Looking up MX records for the domain gives me:
>
> # host -t mx some-domain.de
> some-domain.de mail is handled by 100 relay2.netnames.net.
>
Hi,
I have a mail stuck in my mail queue. The Mail should be delivered to
some.u...@some-domain.de.
Looking up MX records for the domain gives me:
# host -t mx some-domain.de
some-domain.de mail is handled by 100 relay2.netnames.net.
some-domain.de mail is handled by 10 relay1.netnames.net.
Pos
Sahil Tandon wrote:
> I do not believe Mark should have to jump through extra hoops, or that
> you should revert the change. This is a FreeBSD port-specific problem
> created by me that I will address as soon as I can.
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Considering the short time left before the next stable
20 matches
Mail list logo
