If u do not mind letting me know what I did wrong so I can fix it, I would
appreciate it. Like to have the correct format in replying to this group.
Thanks
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 22:22:01 -0500
From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: mail delivery system
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 19:01:43 +0800
Jon Miller articulated:
If u do not mind letting me know what I did wrong so I can fix it, I
would appreciate it. Like to have the correct format in replying to
this group.
Well, for starters, lose the HTML format crap. Plain ASCII is perfectly
acceptable and
Am 08.04.2012 13:01, schrieb Jon Miller:
If u do not mind letting me know what I did wrong so I can fix it, I would
appreciate it.
Like to have the correct format in replying to this group.
you could start with NOT write html messages and NOT
top post like it was told you several times and
I am trying to build an archive server for all email. Here is my setup.
My domain is domain.com
my email server is mail.domain.com and the main.cf settings are:
mydomain is domain.com
myhostname is mail.domain.com
I have a sender_bcc file that says
user u...@archive.domain.com
the
On 2012-04-08 Rich wrote:
My domain is domain.com
my email server is mail.domain.com and the main.cf settings are:
mydomain is domain.com
myhostname is mail.domain.com
I have a sender_bcc file that says
user u...@archive.domain.com
the archive server is archive.domain.com the
The common thing I'm seeing is a poor description of the problem and
goal. :) Try to clarify, in non-technical terms, what you want.
Thanks for the reply. Here goes for the non-technical description:
For sending, I want to be able to send email through my server over an
encrypted channel
Am 09.04.2012 01:42, schrieb Mike Jones!:
I want any person with an email account on the
server to be able to send email to any email address on the internet;
but I do not want anybody else to be able to send email through my
server.
it is the normal behavior of any public reachable
I have a proxy filter in front of Postfix. Postfix is listening on
the localhost. The filter is sending EHLO and XCLIENT to Postfix. The
reason I am trying xclient is to get more information in Postfix's logs.
I'm now getting a significant quantity of brute-force and formerly
hacked password
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:42:29PM -0400, Mike Jones! wrote:
me:
The common thing I'm seeing is a poor description of the problem
and goal. :) Try to clarify, in non-technical terms, what you
want.
Thanks for the reply. Here goes for the non-technical description:
For sending, I
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 16:20:20 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel L. Miller:
On 4/7/2012 4:30 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel L. Miller:
With the pipe transport, there are
flag settings that affect how the message is processed - particularly
the ability to add the Delivered-To
On 4/8/2012 8:11 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I make use of the Delivered-To and X-Original-To headers that are set via the
pipe transport (and when I used it, the virtual transport). I'm using the
Dovecot lda via the pipe connection. Dovecot offers a lmtp delivery agent
that is (so I'm
I am still getting the loop. I am getting the message back at my
mail.domain.com. could it be something to do with dns or my mx for my
domain?
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Ansgar Wiechers li...@planetcobalt.netwrote:
On 2012-04-08 Rich wrote:
My domain is domain.com
my email server is
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 06:11:53PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Whatever I did or said that got people upset - I apologize.
Please allow me to rephrase.
I was not upset, hope you did not take it that way. Although now that
you mention it, I could be a bit annoyed at the line wrapping in this
On 9.4.2012, at 6.06, /dev/rob0 wrote:
- is there a particular reason why these headers are not already
an option via lmtp (aside from nobody asking for or seeing the
need previously). Is there an architectural or conceptual reason
why these headers should not be added via an lmtp connection?
14 matches
Mail list logo
