Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-08 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 9.4.2012, at 6.06, /dev/rob0 wrote: >> - is there a particular reason why these headers are not already >> an option via lmtp (aside from nobody asking for or seeing the >> need previously). Is there an architectural or conceptual reason >> why these headers should not be added via an lmtp conn

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-08 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 06:11:53PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Whatever I did or said that got people upset - I apologize. > Please allow me to rephrase. I was not upset, hope you did not take it that way. Although now that you mention it, I could be a bit annoyed at the line wrapping in thi

Re: how to fix forwarding loop

2012-04-08 Thread Rich
I am still getting the loop. I am getting the message back at my mail.domain.com. could it be something to do with dns or my mx for my domain? On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: > On 2012-04-08 Rich wrote: > > My domain is domain.com > > my email server is mail.domain.com an

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-08 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/8/2012 8:11 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > I make use of the Delivered-To and X-Original-To headers that are set via the > pipe transport (and when I used it, the virtual transport). I'm using the > Dovecot lda via the pipe connection. Dovecot offers a lmtp delivery agent > that is (so I'm

Re: pipe flags vs lmtp

2012-04-08 Thread Daniel L. Miller
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 16:20:20 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema wrote: > Daniel L. Miller: > >> On 4/7/2012 4:30 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> >>> Daniel L. Miller: >>> With the pipe transport, there are flag settings that affect how the message is processed - particularly the ability to add t

Re: Tying it together: postfix, sasl, dovecot

2012-04-08 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 07:42:29PM -0400, Mike Jones! wrote: me: > > The common thing I'm seeing is a poor description of the problem > > and goal. :) Try to clarify, in non-technical terms, what you > > want. > > Thanks for the reply. Here goes for the non-technical description: > > For sendi

xclient logging

2012-04-08 Thread Daniel L. Miller
I have a proxy filter in front of Postfix. Postfix is listening on the localhost. The filter is sending EHLO and XCLIENT to Postfix. The reason I am trying xclient is to get more information in Postfix's logs. I'm now getting a significant quantity of brute-force and formerly hacked password

Re: Tying it together: postfix, sasl, dovecot

2012-04-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.04.2012 01:42, schrieb Mike Jones!: > I want any person with an email account on the > server to be able to send email to any email address on the internet; > but I do not want anybody else to be able to send email through my > server. it is the normal behavior of any public reachable mai

Re: Tying it together: postfix, sasl, dovecot

2012-04-08 Thread Mike Jones!
> The common thing I'm seeing is a poor description of the problem and > goal. :) Try to clarify, in non-technical terms, what you want. Thanks for the reply. Here goes for the non-technical description: For sending, I want to be able to send email through my server over an encrypted channel usi

Re: how to fix forwarding loop

2012-04-08 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2012-04-08 Rich wrote: > My domain is domain.com > my email server is mail.domain.com and the main.cf settings are: > mydomain is domain.com > myhostname is mail.domain.com > I have a sender_bcc file that says > > user u...@archive.domain.com > > the archive server is archive.domain.c

how to fix forwarding loop

2012-04-08 Thread Rich
I am trying to build an archive server for all email. Here is my setup. My domain is domain.com my email server is mail.domain.com and the main.cf settings are: mydomain is domain.com myhostname is mail.domain.com I have a sender_bcc file that says user u...@archive.domain.com the arc

Re: mail delivery system message

2012-04-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 08.04.2012 13:01, schrieb Jon Miller: > If u do not mind letting me know what I did wrong so I can fix it, I would > appreciate it. > Like to have the correct format in replying to this group. you could start with NOT write html messages and NOT top post like it was told you several times a

Re: mail delivery system message

2012-04-08 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 19:01:43 +0800 Jon Miller articulated: > If u do not mind letting me know what I did wrong so I can fix it, I > would appreciate it. Like to have the correct format in replying to > this group. Well, for starters, lose the HTML format crap. Plain ASCII is perfectly acceptable a

RE: mail delivery system message

2012-04-08 Thread Jon Miller
If u do not mind letting me know what I did wrong so I can fix it, I would appreciate it. Like to have the correct format in replying to this group. Thanks > Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 22:22:01 -0500 > From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: Re: mail delivery system me