Am 17.04.2012 05:29, schrieb Mike Zupan:
> We are looking to log all outbound emails in code.. not tailing a lot
> or anything.. is there an area of the code I can look at first to get
> an idea of where the final stop for emails through postfix go before
> they are sent out. We are looking to log
* Franck MAHE :
> [root@fsrv02 postfix]# tail /var/log/mail/errors.log
> Apr 17 01:59:09 fsrv02 postfix/smtpd[7889]: fatal: no SASL authentication
> mechanisms
>
> [root@fsrv02 postfix]# tail /var/log/mail/warnings.log
> Apr 17 01:59:09 fsrv02 postfix/smtpd[7889]: warning:
> xsasl_cyrus_server_get
On 4/16/2012 11:00 PM, Punit Jain wrote:
[please don't top post. Thanks.]
> Hi Noel,
>
> This will send the email to u...@sms.example.com. But my requirement is to
> send copy of email to SMS program
Yes, exactly. To deliver multiple copies, you need multiple
recipients. You specify in tran
On Apr 17, 2012, at 06:00, Punit Jain wrote:
> This will send the email to u...@sms.example.com. But my requirement is to
> send copy of email to SMS program which itself does some processing and finds
> the recipient and send the sms accordingly.
Read Noel's reply again, specifically the part
On Apr 16, 2012, at 14:20, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Dear Postfix Jedi,
I need your help to secure a new postfix server against the SPAM flooding.
Currently I have an old postfix based on an old debian server and since
some days, my server is subject to the SPAM fl
On Apr 17, 2012, at 05:29, Mike Zupan wrote:
> We are looking to log all outbound emails in code.. not tailing a lot
> or anything.. is there an area of the code I can look at first to get
> an idea of where the final stop for emails through postfix go before
> they are sent out. We are looking to
Hi Noel,
This will send the email to u...@sms.example.com. But my requirement is to send
copy of email to SMS program which itself does some processing and finds the
recipient and send the sms accordingly.
Thanks and Regards,
Punit
- Original Message -
From: "Noel Jones"
To: postfix
We are looking to log all outbound emails in code.. not tailing a lot
or anything.. is there an area of the code I can look at first to get
an idea of where the final stop for emails through postfix go before
they are sent out. We are looking to log all cc/bcc emails also. We
have a compliance regu
On Apr 16, 2012, at 8:10 PM, Franck MAHE wrote:
> All,
>
> I’m lost and I don’t understand why it is not working (I did the same
> configuration from another machine who is working).
>
> [root@fsrv02 postfix]# postconf -n
> broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
> command_directory = /usr/sbin
> con
All,
I'm lost and I don't understand why it is not working (I did the same
configuration from another machine who is working).
[root@fsrv02 postfix]# postconf -n
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/lib64/po
On 4/16/2012 12:46 PM, Punit Jain wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have a requirement where I need to send a copy of mail to pipe daemon for
> some processing, based on if recipient has an attribute set in ldap.
>
> At the same time mail is also delivered to recipient. The pipe daemon can
> pass the mail to
Hi ,
I have a requirement where I need to send a copy of mail to pipe daemon for
some processing, based on if recipient has an attribute set in ldap.
At the same time mail is also delivered to recipient. The pipe daemon can pass
the mail to SMS fateway for sms to be delivered.
Any clues how to
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 08:34 -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:58:31AM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
> > A bit of an extreme example, but i've often wondered, when
> > looking through my Postfix logs, why some senders do this:
> >
> > Received: from mx-out.facebook.com (outmail019.snc7
On 4/16/2012 9:31 AM, mail...@securitylabs.it wrote:
> Hello, just upgraded my Postfix from 2.8.x to 2.9.1 (Debian 6.0,
> Postfix coming from backports) to use postscreen and following this:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
>
> I've modified my master.cf as follow:
>
> #smtp
Hello, just upgraded my Postfix from 2.8.x to 2.9.1 (Debian 6.0, Postfix
coming from backports) to use postscreen and following this:
http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
I've modified my master.cf as follow:
#smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
smtpd pass n
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:48:16PM +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> On 16/04/12 21:57, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> > I would not bother with prettifying headers or SMTP transaction
> > output that is generally only seen by automated systems,
>
> It's mainly for "vanity" virtual hosting so our clients c
Zitat von Wietse Venema :
Mark Constable:
12.34.56.78:smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
-o myhostname=domain1.com
This change all SMTP server responses that depend on the
myhostname settings.
Any thoughts or suggestions on how to improve this strategy?
Use separate MTA instances.
By changing t
On 16/04/12 23:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> More importantly, with the -o myhostname=domain1.com they can
>> fully pass any hardfail SPF test
>
> this has nothing to do with the hostname
True from a fail/pass SPF inspection by the remote mailserver but
not from a support techie eyeball point of vie
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:58:31AM +0100, Sam Jones wrote:
> A bit of an extreme example, but i've often wondered, when
> looking through my Postfix logs, why some senders do this:
>
> Received: from mx-out.facebook.com (outmail019.snc7.facebook.com
> [69.171.232.153]) by .
>
> The connecting
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:37:00AM +0200, Rodolphe Quiédeville wrote:
> Le 13/04/2012 19:27, Kizito Thomas a écrit :
> > Thank you Ansgar, Does it mean I cannot use this method to block
> > un desirable mails this way? At first I tried using the method
> > explained on
> > http://www.cyberciti.b
Mark Constable:
> 12.34.56.78:smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o myhostname=domain1.com
This change all SMTP server responses that depend on the
myhostname settings.
> Any thoughts or suggestions on how to improve this strategy?
Use separate MTA instances.
By changing the MTA name in one SMTP clie
Am 16.04.2012 14:48, schrieb Mark Constable:
> On 16/04/12 21:57, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
>> I would not bother with prettifying headers or SMTP transaction
>> output that is generally only seen by automated systems,
>
> It's mainly for "vanity" virtual hosting so our clients can be
> assured the
On 16/04/12 21:57, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> I would not bother with prettifying headers or SMTP transaction
> output that is generally only seen by automated systems,
It's mainly for "vanity" virtual hosting so our clients can be
assured they have their own fully branded mail service.
More import
Zitat von Stéphane Wirtel :
Is there an efficient way to know if my server is blacklisted ? a reference ?
Enter the IP in question at http://multirbl.valli.org/ is one possibility
Regards
Andreas
Zitat von Stéphane Wirtel :
Hi Stan,
On 04/16/2012 01:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 4/16/2012 4:33 AM, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
Dear Postfix Jedi,
I need your help to secure a new postfix server against the SPAM flooding.
Currently I have an old postfix based on an old debian server and sin
Hi all,
I will push my config in a gist (github.com) asap.
Regards,
Stéphane
Hi Andreas,
On 04/16/2012 01:46 PM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>
> Zitat von Stephane Wirtel :
>
>> Dear Postfix Jedi,
>>
>> I need your help to secure a new postfix server against the SPAM flooding.
>>
>> Currently I have an old postfix based on an old debian server and since
>> some days, my s
On Apr 16, 2012, at 12:01, Mark Constable wrote:
> I managed to get multiple SSL certs working on multiple virtual
> IPs on the same server so vhost domains appeared to be completely
> independent from the base server. I'd like an opinion as to whether
> this is the right or best way to do this...
Hi Stan,
On 04/16/2012 01:27 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 4/16/2012 4:33 AM, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
>> Dear Postfix Jedi,
>>
>> I need your help to secure a new postfix server against the SPAM flooding.
>>
>> Currently I have an old postfix based on an old debian server and since
>> some days, my
Zitat von Stephane Wirtel :
Dear Postfix Jedi,
I need your help to secure a new postfix server against the SPAM flooding.
Currently I have an old postfix based on an old debian server and since
some days, my server is subject to the SPAM flooding (+- 50k mails/hours).
What do you mean by 50
On 4/16/2012 4:33 AM, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
> Dear Postfix Jedi,
>
> I need your help to secure a new postfix server against the SPAM flooding.
>
> Currently I have an old postfix based on an old debian server and since
> some days, my server is subject to the SPAM flooding (+- 50k mails/hours).
I'm was wrong. Postfix (on debian) default working in chroot.
In chroot environment no file "etc/resolv.conf", why he could not
resolve IP-address.
Thank. The problem is solved.
--
С уважением, Шарипов Руслан.
Руководитель отдела разработки и сопровождения программного
обеспечения ОАО "Уфанет".
I managed to get multiple SSL certs working on multiple virtual
IPs on the same server so vhost domains appeared to be completely
independent from the base server. I'd like an opinion as to whether
this is the right or best way to do this... domain1.com = 12.34.56.78
/etc/postfix/master.cf
12.34.
Dear Postfix Jedi,
I need your help to secure a new postfix server against the SPAM flooding.
Currently I have an old postfix based on an old debian server and since
some days, my server is subject to the SPAM flooding (+- 50k mails/hours).
So, I have decided to reconfigure a new server with an
Zitat von Руслан Шарипов :
Hello.
Postfix can not resolve the IP-address, but the nameserver is
configured correctly.
See, in mail.log:
root@mail2:/var/log# tail -3 mail.log
Apr 16 02:35:44 mail2 postfix/smtpd[1855]: connect from
unknown[209.85.215.53]
Apr 16 02:35:45 mail2 postfix/smtpd[1
2012/4/16 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Руслан Шарипов :
>> But in fact (execute in the console on the same server):
>> root@mail2:/var/log# host 209.85.215.53
>> 53.215.85.209.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com.
>> That is, PTR-record for the IP-address is correct.
>
> And wha
* Руслан Шарипов :
> But in fact (execute in the console on the same server):
> root@mail2:/var/log# host 209.85.215.53
> 53.215.85.209.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com.
> That is, PTR-record for the IP-address is correct.
And what about
host mail-lpp01m010-f53.goog
Hello.
Postfix can not resolve the IP-address, but the nameserver is
configured correctly.
See, in mail.log:
root@mail2:/var/log# tail -3 mail.log
Apr 16 02:35:44 mail2 postfix/smtpd[1855]: connect from unknown[209.85.215.53]
Apr 16 02:35:45 mail2 postfix/smtpd[1855]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
u
38 matches
Mail list logo
