On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:24:43PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> and really, you should only look at this once you analyzed the
> situation for more "neutral" approaches, such as: mail submission
> should require authentication. this does not solve all problems,
> but if your authnetication is compromis
On 10/18/2012 10:24 PM, mouss wrote:
you can try
http://countries.nerd.dk/more.html
you can also try GeoIP.
Also check out http://ipdeny.com/
Regards,
Patrick
Le 17/10/2012 22:41, Thomas E Lackey a écrit :
> I am looking into a system where one of the [virtual] mail accounts was
> compromised.
>
> Apparently the account, once compromised, was used to send spam from
> overseas hosts. Since the company has no overseas users, they asked if
> it were poss
* Simone Felici :
>
> Hello to all!
>
> I've a little issue with some queued mails. On a server a script is
> sending mails using perl and the '/bin/mail' command. This night I've
> registered a network outage and some mails are not sent.
> Of course the daemon running is postfix.
> After some se
Hello to all!
I've a little issue with some queued mails. On a server a script is sending mails using perl and the
'/bin/mail' command. This night I've registered a network outage and some mails are not sent.
Of course the daemon running is postfix.
After some search I've noticed the mails are
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:14:03AM +, Duane Hill wrote:
> On Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 11:03:06 UTC,
> s...@hardwarefreak.com confabulated:
>
> > On 10/18/2012 4:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> i am not soo familar with dnsmasq but have a good expierience
> >> with it to do tricks like "
On Oct 18, 2012, at 14:01, Nick Rosier wrote:
>>> I've got an SPF records as following:
>>>
>>> bunbun.be. 86400 IN SPF "v=spf1 a mx ptr
>>> ip6:::/64 -all"
>>>
>>> Haven't noticed any problems.
>>
>> You should not need to publish IPv6 specific SPF records,
On 18/10/2012 14:41, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/18/2012 5:04 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
DO NOT send debug log files unless specifically requested. Normal
log files are sufficient.
And a friendly reminder that splitting required troubleshooting info
up between multiple messages greatly reduces the
On 10/18/2012 5:04 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
> I had the debug included but the list admin bounced it due to max
> characters exceeded.
> I will resend it to the list
DO NOT send debug log files unless specifically requested. Normal
log files are sufficient.
And a friendly reminder that splittin
On Oct 18, 2012, at 00:56, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Right now, we can have up to 4 different processing filters in our
> configuration, based on what features are enabled.
>
> In general, we always have:
>
> 1) OpenDKIM for signing
>
> Then we almost always have
>
> 2) Amavis
>
> Then we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 07:21:26 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Renato:
> > Oct 17 15:15:26 localhost postfix/local[2248]: B3322200238:
> > to=, orig_to=, relay=local, delay=3.6,
> > delays=3.5/0/0/0.05, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure)
DTNX Postmaster wrote:
On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:20, Nick Rosier wrote:
David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone publish SPF records for IPV6 in DNS? The reason I ask is
my mail server has both an IPV4 and an IPV6 address and when
connecting to it via webmail that goes to localhost, it seems as
On Oct 18, 2012, at 11:20, Nick Rosier wrote:
> David Mehler wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anyone publish SPF records for IPV6 in DNS? The reason I ask is
>> my mail server has both an IPV4 and an IPV6 address and when
>> connecting to it via webmail that goes to localhost, it seems as if
>> the ou
Renato:
> Oct 17 15:15:26 localhost postfix/local[2248]: B3322200238:
> to=, orig_to=, relay=local, delay=3.6,
> delays=3.5/0/0/0.05, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure)
This means one of the following:
- procmail exited with status EX_TEMPFAIL
- Postfix had a fatal run-time error aft
On 18/10/2012 12:55, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:04:37 +0200
Tom Kinghorn articulated:
{While you are at it, could you lose the urge to send posts in HTML
format. "GMail" is perfectly capable of sending in plain text format.
Thank you!
Formatting changed.
Apologies.
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 11:03:06 UTC, s...@hardwarefreak.com
confabulated:
> On 10/18/2012 4:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i am not soo familar with dnsmasq but have a good expierience
>> with it to do tricks like "i need the content of /etc/hosts
>> via DNS for apache trafficserver wit
On 10/18/2012 4:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i am not soo familar with dnsmasq but have a good expierience
> with it to do tricks like "i need the content of /etc/hosts
> via DNS for apache trafficserver without breaking the normal
> dns-resolution of the host"
>
> maybe place the rbl-program on
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:04:37 +0200
Tom Kinghorn articulated:
{SNIP}
> I had the debug included but the list admin bounced it due to max
> characters exceeded.
> I will resend it to the list.
While you are at it, could you lose the urge to send posts in HTML
format. "GMail" is perfectly capable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:37:00 +0100
Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> Is your procmail in /usr/bin ? maybe it's in another part of the file
> system, such as /usr/local/bin ?
$ which procmail
/usr/bin/procmail
So I'm trying the .forward method; I commente
On 10/17/2012 3:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:33:38PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 10/16/2012 9:17 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>>> Here is my alias in /etc/aliases:
>>> # Forward mdcm messages to mail handler
>>> mdcm: |"/root/webapps/cbsweb/WEB-INF/bin/mdcm/mailHandler"
[ Noel Jones wrote on Wed 17.Oct'12 at 16:32:28 -0500 ]
> > I'm almost changing by cyrus.
>
> I doubt cyrus will be any easier to configure, but use whatever
> works for you.
Stick with Dovecot - cyrus is more tricky in my experience, especially
as you are having trouble with your current set-up
On 17/10/2012 15:18, Noel Jones wrote:
Show "postconf -n" and the postfix logs of your test. -- Noel Jones
Hi Noel.
I guess I should have done that at the start, my apologies.
Just an update.
when doing a test via the CLI, it seems to work.
So I am guessing a permit statement further down is
[ Renato wrote on Wed 17.Oct'12 at 16:06:40 +0200 ]
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, I'm new to postfix and MTAs in general; I'd like to set it up for
> local delivery only on my Archlinux box. I've followed the instructions
> on the archwiki [1] and my configuration file
David Mehler wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone publish SPF records for IPV6 in DNS? The reason I ask is
my mail server has both an IPV4 and an IPV6 address and when
connecting to it via webmail that goes to localhost, it seems as if
the outgoing connection is either IPV4 or IPV6 depending on whether
tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:44:16 -0400
staticsafe wrote:
> On 17/10/2012 10:06 AM, Renato wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi, I'm new to postfix and MTAs in general; I'd like to set it up
> > for local delivery only o
i am not soo familar with dnsmasq but have a good expierience
with it to do tricks like "i need the content of /etc/hosts
via DNS for apache trafficserver without breaking the normal
dns-resolution of the host"
maybe place the rbl-program on a virtual interface and
some tricks with dnsmasq can be
I feared that :-(
The RBL program doesn't allow to configure forwarders.
I have add (not replace) the "nameserver 127.0.0.1" to the resolv.conf file and
now it works more or less. Postfix asks all the queries to the RBL program, and
if they are not resolved, then the server asks queries to the
* Arantza Serrano :
> But I want that the postfix uses the external DNS servers for the relay
> queries, to check mailfrom domain, etc
> I would like the Postfix program to use the external DNS servers for all the
> queries EXCEPT for the RBL queries.
That's not possible. Configure the DNS o
But I want that the postfix uses the external DNS servers for the relay
queries, to check mailfrom domain, etc
I would like the Postfix program to use the external DNS servers for all the
queries EXCEPT for the RBL queries.
-Mensaje original-
De: Ralf Hildebrandt [mailto:ralf.hilde
* Arantza Serrano :
> [root@comfix1des postfix]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> search midominio
> nameserver XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
> nameserver YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY
use
nameserver 127.0.0.1
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Fran
Hello,
Does anyone publish SPF records for IPV6 in DNS? The reason I ask is
my mail server has both an IPV4 and an IPV6 address and when
connecting to it via webmail that goes to localhost, it seems as if
the outgoing connection is either IPV4 or IPV6 depending on whether
that localhost connection
[root@comfix1des postfix]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
search midominio
nameserver XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
nameserver YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY
[root@comfix1des postfix]# postfix check
[root@comfix1des postfix]#
-Mensaje original-
De: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] En
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tomas Macek:
The part of the log is here:
Oct 11 12:26:44 mail postfix/smtpd[4546]: < my.pc.host.name[x.x.x.x]: RSET
Oct 11 12:26:44 mail postfix/smtpd[4546]: > my.pc.host.name[x.x.x.]: 250 2.0.0
Ok
Oct 11 12:26:44 mail postfix/smtpd[4546]: > my.pc.ho
* Arantza Serrano :
> But obviously the Postfix program makes all its queries to the external
> DNS servers, so my RBL program isn't used from the Postfix. I would like
> the Postfix program to use the external DNS servers for all the queries
> except for the RBL queries. Is it posible to configur
Hello,
I have installed a RBL program in my postfix server. This RBL program
responds IP queries like that:
dig @localhost -p 53 213.176.163.216.std.rbl.servidor.midominio
; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6 <<>> @localhost -p 53
213.176.163.216.std.rbl. servidor.midominio
;
* Thomas E Lackey :
> I am looking into a system where one of the [virtual] mail accounts was
> compromised.
>
> Apparently the account, once compromised, was used to send spam from
> overseas hosts. Since the company has no overseas users, they asked if
> it were possible to block outbound/rela
36 matches
Mail list logo