Re: memcache adress verify cleanup

2012-11-17 Thread Daniel Luttermann
On 11/18/2012 Wietse Venema wrote: > Daniel Luttermann: >>/etc/postfix/verify-memcache.cf: >> >>memcache = inet:127.0.0.1:11211 >>backup = proxy:btree:/var/lib/postfix/verify_cache_map >> >>/etc/postfix/memcache-postscreen.cf: >> >>memcache = inet:127.0.0.1:11211 >>backup = proxy:btree:/var/l

Re: memcache adress verify cleanup

2012-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Daniel Luttermann: >/etc/postfix/verify-memcache.cf: > >memcache = inet:127.0.0.1:11211 >backup = proxy:btree:/var/lib/postfix/verify_cache_map > >/etc/postfix/memcache-postscreen.cf: > >memcache = inet:127.0.0.1:11211 >backup = proxy:btree:/var/lib/postfix/postscreen_cache_map Well there is

Re: memcache adress verify cleanup

2012-11-17 Thread Daniel Luttermann
On 11/17/2012 Wietse Venema wrote: > Daniel Luttermann: >> > The cache cleanup will still run unless you've turned it off. >> > # postconf | grep cleanup_interval >> >> root@mail:~# postconf | grep cleanup_interval >> address_verify_cache_cleanup_interval = 12h >> postscreen_cache_cleanup_interva

Re: memcache adress verify cleanup

2012-11-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Daniel Luttermann: > > The cache cleanup will still run unless you've turned it off. > > # postconf | grep cleanup_interval > > root@mail:~# postconf | grep cleanup_interval > address_verify_cache_cleanup_interval = 12h > postscreen_cache_cleanup_interval = 12h And both postscreen and verify use

Re: memcache adress verify cleanup

2012-11-17 Thread Daniel Luttermann
On 11/17/2012 Noel Jones wrote: > On 11/17/2012 3:07 PM, Daniel Luttermann wrote: >> Hi, >> I've changed my config to use memcache for postscreen and verify. >> Now, I assume that the cache cleanup for the verify db doesn't run >> anymore. >> For postscreen, there are entries like this in /var/log

Re: memcache adress verify cleanup

2012-11-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 11/17/2012 3:07 PM, Daniel Luttermann wrote: > Hi, > I've changed my config to use memcache for postscreen and verify. > Now, I assume that the cache cleanup for the verify db doesn't run > anymore. > For postscreen, there are entries like this in /var/log/mail.info: > Nov 17 16:43:25 mail postf

memcache adress verify cleanup

2012-11-17 Thread Daniel Luttermann
Hi, I've changed my config to use memcache for postscreen and verify. Now, I assume that the cache cleanup for the verify db doesn't run anymore. For postscreen, there are entries like this in /var/log/mail.info: Nov 17 16:43:25 mail postfix/postscreen[863]: cache memcache:/etc/postfix/memcache

Re: OpenSSL: TXT_DB error number 2

2012-11-17 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 02:07:17PM -0500, thorso...@lavabit.com wrote: > > No, you don't need a dedicated root CA to sign a you server > > certificate, your server certificate can just be self-signed, this > > was covered quite a few messages ago, when you first started asking > > about TLS. > >

Re: OpenSSL: TXT_DB error number 2

2012-11-17 Thread thorsopia
Hello, > No, you don't need a dedicated root CA to sign a you server > certificate, your server certificate can just be self-signed, this > was covered quite a few messages ago, when you first started asking > about TLS. > openssl req -new -x509 ... > generates a self-signed certificate,

Re: Client can't access through submission protocol

2012-11-17 Thread Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD
On 13/11/12 19:08, Noel Jones wrote: > On 11/13/2012 1:30 AM, Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> The submission port is setup like this >> submission inet n - n - - smtpd >> -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt >> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes

Re: "Simplest" approach to full-adress aliases?

2012-11-17 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 03:24:33PM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 11/17/2012 02:22 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: > >On 2012-11-17 Jan Johansson wrote: > >>Having mostly used Exim I am trying to sort out a few things with > >>a postfix (2.8.5-2~build0.11.04 on Ubuntu) install. > >> > >>Basically,

Re: "Simplest" approach to full-adress aliases?

2012-11-17 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 11/17/2012 02:22 PM, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2012-11-17 Jan Johansson wrote: Having mostly used Exim I am trying to sort out a few things with a postfix (2.8.5-2~build0.11.04 on Ubuntu) install. Basically, I want a forwarding mechanism that can map us...@domainalpha.com

Re: Delivering only specific mails locally

2012-11-17 Thread /dev/rob0
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 07:05:28AM +0100, Gerald Vogt wrote: > The only exception now is mails addressed specifically to > @localhost, e.g. account2@localhost are also delivered locally. > > I guess I could live with that and see if anything accumulates > in mailboxes except account. Or is there

Re: "Simplest" approach to full-adress aliases?

2012-11-17 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2012-11-17 Jan Johansson wrote: > Having mostly used Exim I am trying to sort out a few things with a > postfix (2.8.5-2~build0.11.04 on Ubuntu) install. > > Basically, I want a forwarding mechanism that can map > us...@domainalpha.com to > anotheru...@anotherdom

"Simplest" approach to full-adress aliases?

2012-11-17 Thread Jan Johansson
Hello! Having mostly used Exim I am trying to sort out a few things with a postfix (2.8.5-2~build0.11.04 on Ubuntu) install. Basically, I want a forwarding mechanism that can map us...@domainalpha.com to anotheru...@anotherdomain.com