On 04/19/2013 12:07 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 4/18/2013 4:26 AM, Mikael Bak wrote:
Hi Josef,
On 04/18/2013 11:06 AM, Josef Karliak wrote:
Good morning,
our outgoing smtp server gets into a backscatter blacklist. When I
checked my logs, there were only one mailer daemon email to some
I have a requirement of 2 different users using the same sender email
address
I found a very old patch for doing this in postfix.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.devel/4
Is this patch still the only way of doing multiple owners
Thanks
Ram
Am 19.04.2013 10:44, schrieb Ram:
I have a requirement of 2 different users using the same sender email address
I found a very old patch for doing this in postfix.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.devel/4
Is this patch still the only way of doing multiple owners
why does
On 4/19/2013 1:28 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Last time I read ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README, I noticed that this isn't
true: you can route your probes to the final delivery machine while
leaving the current delivery mechanism intact:
Your description is too sketchy. Please choose appropriate domain
names under example.com, example.net, example.org, ... (if the real
domain names are sensitive) that make it clear what sender and
recipient addresses look like in each direction.
You should be able to the right thing with
Is there a way of testing for backscatter?
I do not believe that my setup up is a source of backscatter. However,
believing and knowing are different things.
When ever I make a change in my setup, I test for open relay.
But I wonder if there are other things that I should be testing for.
John
On 2013-04-19 6:57 AM, John Allen j...@klam.ca wrote:
Is there a way of testing for backscatter?
I do not believe that my setup up is a source of backscatter. However,
believing and knowing are different things.
As long as you reject messages destined for invalid recipients, and
don't
On 19/04/2013 7:03 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-04-19 6:57 AM, John Allen j...@klam.ca wrote:
Is there a way of testing for backscatter?
I do not believe that my setup up is a source of backscatter.
However, believing and knowing are different things.
As long as you reject messages
Zitat von Ram r...@netcore.co.in:
I have a requirement of 2 different users using the same sender
email address
I found a very old patch for doing this in postfix.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.devel/4
Is this patch still the only way of doing multiple owners
Not sure
Am 2013-04-19 12:28, schrieb nullnullachtfuenfz...@arcor.de:
The problem arises with mail originating from senders in
@B2.example.com to recipients in @A1.example.com.
Because the destination server in A also does a
smtpd_sender_restrictions=reject_unknown_sender_domain and
@B2.example.com is
On 2013-04-19 7:10 AM, John Allen j...@klam.ca wrote:
On 19/04/2013 7:03 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-04-19 6:57 AM, John Allen j...@klam.ca wrote:
Is there a way of testing for backscatter?
I do not believe that my setup up is a source of backscatter.
However, believing and knowing are
I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
cards are allowed but it appears they are not. If that is true then I
need to list each one individually. However, I am also using generic
mapping and again
Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
cards are allowed but it appears they are not
no and wildchars in case of mail are generally a bad idea
If
Reindl Harald:
Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
cards are allowed but it appears they are not
no and wildchars in case of mail are generally
On 18/04/2013 19:05, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dan Clovis:
Apr 18 15:44:06 companycoServer1 postfix/local[15179]: 5F6A214EE1B4: to=
d...@companycouk.com, orig_to=d...@ccpop.itco.co, relay=local, delay=0.35,
delays=0.29/0/0/0.06, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command:
procmail -a $EXTENSION)
On 4/19/2013 8:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.04.2013 14:25, schrieb awingnut:
I have a series of user names that need to be relayed through a server
other then the default. It is not clear from the documentation if wild
cards are allowed but it appears they are not
no and wildchars in
Am 2013-04-19 12:28, schrieb nullnullachtfuenfz...@arcor.de:
The problem arises with mail originating from senders in
@B2.example.com to recipients in @A1.example.com.
Because the destination server in A also does a
smtpd_sender_restrictions=reject_unknown_sender_domain and
Hi All,
I'm not sure if this is the correct group to ask so apologies if it's not.
I wanted to ask if anyone has a good way of sending emails that have ZIP
attachments that contain EXE files to QUARANTINE. I am using POSTFIX sending
to PROCMAIL and CLAMAV. I've looked into procmail recipies and
On 19 Apr 2013 18:47, Andreas Freyvogel afreyvo...@ecmarket.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm not sure if this is the correct group to ask so apologies if it's not.
I wanted to ask if anyone has a good way of sending emails that have ZIP
attachments that contain EXE files to QUARANTINE. I am using
Daniel Flaum:
/notifier@dev1\.example\.com/ notify-l...@groups.example.com
/.+@dev1\.example\.com/ a.per...@example.com
/.*@.*/ firehose@localhost
As documented in virtual(5), virtual_alias_maps is expanded recursively
(see WikiPedia for
On 4/19/2013 11:46 AM, Andreas Freyvogel wrote:
Hi All,
I'm not sure if this is the correct group to ask so apologies if it's not.
I wanted to ask if anyone has a good way of sending emails that have ZIP
attachments that contain EXE files to QUARANTINE. I am using POSTFIX sending
to
21 matches
Mail list logo
